在COVID-19大流行期间,使用机器学习预测对在线自我引导压力干预的吸收。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Gavin N Rackoff, Michelle G Newman
{"title":"在COVID-19大流行期间,使用机器学习预测对在线自我引导压力干预的吸收。","authors":"Gavin N Rackoff, Michelle G Newman","doi":"10.1002/smi.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Online self-guided interventions appear efficacious for alleviating some mental health concerns. However, among persons who are offered online interventions, only a fraction access them (i.e., achieve uptake). Machine learning methods may be useful to predict who will achieve uptake, which could inform improvements to interventions and their methods of delivery. We used secondary data from participants given access to a self-guided online stress intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in a randomised trial (N = 301, among whom 158 achieved uptake). This study built and evaluated several models for predicting uptake. Putative predictors included demographic characteristics, mental health service utilization and interest, and mental health symptoms assessed before participants were provided access to the intervention. The best-performing model, a linear support vector machine model, had 70% accuracy and 0.70 area under the receiver operating characteristics curve in a held-out dataset, though these metrics were not significantly better than competitor models. Model inspection revealed that participants who reported interest in mental health treatment and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other sexual minority participants were more likely to achieve uptake. Additionally, male participants were less likely to achieve uptake. The best-performing machine learning model achieved an acceptable level of performance in predicting uptake. Self-reported treatment interest was especially predictive of uptake. Future research should attempt to understand gender and sexual orientation differences in self-guided online mental health intervention uptake. Additionally, research should evaluate the utility of machine learning to inform targeted motivational enhancement of those less likely to achieve uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":51175,"journal":{"name":"Stress and Health","volume":"41 2","pages":"e70032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Machine Learning to Predict Uptake to an Online Self-Guided Intervention for Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Gavin N Rackoff, Michelle G Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/smi.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Online self-guided interventions appear efficacious for alleviating some mental health concerns. However, among persons who are offered online interventions, only a fraction access them (i.e., achieve uptake). Machine learning methods may be useful to predict who will achieve uptake, which could inform improvements to interventions and their methods of delivery. We used secondary data from participants given access to a self-guided online stress intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in a randomised trial (N = 301, among whom 158 achieved uptake). This study built and evaluated several models for predicting uptake. Putative predictors included demographic characteristics, mental health service utilization and interest, and mental health symptoms assessed before participants were provided access to the intervention. The best-performing model, a linear support vector machine model, had 70% accuracy and 0.70 area under the receiver operating characteristics curve in a held-out dataset, though these metrics were not significantly better than competitor models. Model inspection revealed that participants who reported interest in mental health treatment and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other sexual minority participants were more likely to achieve uptake. Additionally, male participants were less likely to achieve uptake. The best-performing machine learning model achieved an acceptable level of performance in predicting uptake. Self-reported treatment interest was especially predictive of uptake. Future research should attempt to understand gender and sexual orientation differences in self-guided online mental health intervention uptake. Additionally, research should evaluate the utility of machine learning to inform targeted motivational enhancement of those less likely to achieve uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stress and Health\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"e70032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013697/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stress and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70032\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线自我指导干预似乎对缓解一些心理健康问题有效。然而,在获得在线干预措施的人群中,只有一小部分人获得了这些干预措施(即实现了吸收)。机器学习方法可能有助于预测谁将实现吸收,这可以为干预措施及其交付方法的改进提供信息。我们在一项随机试验中使用了来自参与者的辅助数据,这些参与者在COVID-19大流行期间获得了自我指导的在线压力干预(N = 301,其中158人获得了接受)。本研究建立并评估了几种预测摄取的模型。假定的预测因素包括人口统计学特征、心理健康服务的利用和兴趣,以及在参与者获得干预之前评估的心理健康症状。表现最好的模型是线性支持向量机模型,在hold - hold数据集中,准确率为70%,接收器操作特征曲线下面积为0.70,尽管这些指标并没有明显优于竞争对手的模型。模型检验显示,报告对心理健康治疗感兴趣的参与者和女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和其他性少数群体参与者更有可能接受治疗。此外,男性参与者不太可能获得吸收。表现最好的机器学习模型在预测摄取方面达到了可接受的性能水平。自我报告的治疗兴趣尤其能预测接受治疗的可能性。未来的研究应该尝试理解性别和性取向在自我引导的在线心理健康干预的吸收上的差异。此外,研究应该评估机器学习的效用,为那些不太可能实现的动机增强提供有针对性的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Machine Learning to Predict Uptake to an Online Self-Guided Intervention for Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Online self-guided interventions appear efficacious for alleviating some mental health concerns. However, among persons who are offered online interventions, only a fraction access them (i.e., achieve uptake). Machine learning methods may be useful to predict who will achieve uptake, which could inform improvements to interventions and their methods of delivery. We used secondary data from participants given access to a self-guided online stress intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic in a randomised trial (N = 301, among whom 158 achieved uptake). This study built and evaluated several models for predicting uptake. Putative predictors included demographic characteristics, mental health service utilization and interest, and mental health symptoms assessed before participants were provided access to the intervention. The best-performing model, a linear support vector machine model, had 70% accuracy and 0.70 area under the receiver operating characteristics curve in a held-out dataset, though these metrics were not significantly better than competitor models. Model inspection revealed that participants who reported interest in mental health treatment and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and other sexual minority participants were more likely to achieve uptake. Additionally, male participants were less likely to achieve uptake. The best-performing machine learning model achieved an acceptable level of performance in predicting uptake. Self-reported treatment interest was especially predictive of uptake. Future research should attempt to understand gender and sexual orientation differences in self-guided online mental health intervention uptake. Additionally, research should evaluate the utility of machine learning to inform targeted motivational enhancement of those less likely to achieve uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stress and Health
Stress and Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Stress is a normal component of life and a number of mechanisms exist to cope with its effects. The stresses that challenge man"s existence in our modern society may result in failure of these coping mechanisms, with resultant stress-induced illness. The aim of the journal therefore is to provide a forum for discussion of all aspects of stress which affect the individual in both health and disease. The Journal explores the subject from as many aspects as possible, so that when stress becomes a consideration, health information can be presented as to the best ways by which to minimise its effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信