无稳定剂的漏斗胸微创修复不会导致椎棒移位增加或其他术后并发症。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Cory Nonnemacher, Meredith Elman, Seth Saylors, Ismael Elhalaby, Pablo Aguayo
{"title":"无稳定剂的漏斗胸微创修复不会导致椎棒移位增加或其他术后并发症。","authors":"Cory Nonnemacher, Meredith Elman, Seth Saylors, Ismael Elhalaby, Pablo Aguayo","doi":"10.1089/lap.2025.0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Bar dislocation is one of the most dreaded complications following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (PE). Practice patterns vary regarding bar securement, with some providers using unilateral or bilateral titanium stabilizers. Foreign bodies can be associated with increased morbidity including infection rate and complications during bar removal. We assess patients without the use of stabilizers compared to those with stabilizers. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis of patients treated for PE from November 2020 until June 2024 at a tertiary children's hospital. A comparison of those patients who used stabilizers to those without stabilizers was performed. Rates of bar displacement and bar-related complications were compared. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Ninety-seven total patients were analyzed with 63 receiving stabilizers and 34 with no stabilizers. There was no statistically significant difference in length of stay, readmission, complications, or bar displacements. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Nuss bar placement without stabilizers can be a safe means of correcting PE without increased risk of bar displacement. Minimizing the amount of foreign material has the potential to mitigate postoperative infection, irritation, and pain from surgery. <b><i>Level of Evidence:</i></b> Level 2, retrospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"570-573"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum Without Stabilizers Does Not Result in Increased Bar Displacement or Other Postoperative Complications.\",\"authors\":\"Cory Nonnemacher, Meredith Elman, Seth Saylors, Ismael Elhalaby, Pablo Aguayo\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lap.2025.0070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Bar dislocation is one of the most dreaded complications following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (PE). Practice patterns vary regarding bar securement, with some providers using unilateral or bilateral titanium stabilizers. Foreign bodies can be associated with increased morbidity including infection rate and complications during bar removal. We assess patients without the use of stabilizers compared to those with stabilizers. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis of patients treated for PE from November 2020 until June 2024 at a tertiary children's hospital. A comparison of those patients who used stabilizers to those without stabilizers was performed. Rates of bar displacement and bar-related complications were compared. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Ninety-seven total patients were analyzed with 63 receiving stabilizers and 34 with no stabilizers. There was no statistically significant difference in length of stay, readmission, complications, or bar displacements. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Nuss bar placement without stabilizers can be a safe means of correcting PE without increased risk of bar displacement. Minimizing the amount of foreign material has the potential to mitigate postoperative infection, irritation, and pain from surgery. <b><i>Level of Evidence:</i></b> Level 2, retrospective study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"570-573\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:骨棒脱位是微创漏斗胸修复术后最可怕的并发症之一。在钢条固定方面,实践模式各不相同,一些供应商使用单边或双边钛稳定剂。异物可增加发病率,包括感染率和拔棒过程中的并发症。我们将未使用稳定剂的患者与使用稳定剂的患者进行比较。方法:回顾性分析2020年11月至2024年6月在某三级儿童医院接受PE治疗的患者。对使用稳定剂和不使用稳定剂的患者进行比较。比较骨棒移位和骨棒相关并发症的发生率。结果:共分析97例患者,其中63例使用稳定剂,34例未使用稳定剂。在住院时间、再入院、并发症或支架移位方面没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:不使用稳定剂的Nuss棒放置是一种安全的矫正PE的方法,不会增加棒移位的风险。尽量减少异物的数量有可能减轻术后感染、刺激和手术疼痛。证据等级:2级,回顾性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum Without Stabilizers Does Not Result in Increased Bar Displacement or Other Postoperative Complications.

Introduction: Bar dislocation is one of the most dreaded complications following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (PE). Practice patterns vary regarding bar securement, with some providers using unilateral or bilateral titanium stabilizers. Foreign bodies can be associated with increased morbidity including infection rate and complications during bar removal. We assess patients without the use of stabilizers compared to those with stabilizers. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients treated for PE from November 2020 until June 2024 at a tertiary children's hospital. A comparison of those patients who used stabilizers to those without stabilizers was performed. Rates of bar displacement and bar-related complications were compared. Results: Ninety-seven total patients were analyzed with 63 receiving stabilizers and 34 with no stabilizers. There was no statistically significant difference in length of stay, readmission, complications, or bar displacements. Conclusion: Nuss bar placement without stabilizers can be a safe means of correcting PE without increased risk of bar displacement. Minimizing the amount of foreign material has the potential to mitigate postoperative infection, irritation, and pain from surgery. Level of Evidence: Level 2, retrospective study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信