海报会议:使用瞳孔测量法和SSVEP测量色度和亮度对比度适应。

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Alex A Carter, Abbie J Lawton, Daniel H Baker, Antony B Morland, Lauren E Welbourne, Alex R Wade
{"title":"海报会议:使用瞳孔测量法和SSVEP测量色度和亮度对比度适应。","authors":"Alex A Carter, Abbie J Lawton, Daniel H Baker, Antony B Morland, Lauren E Welbourne, Alex R Wade","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.5.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous evidence suggests both chromatic and luminance contrast adaptation reduces contrast sensitivity in the post-adaptation period. This effect is chromatically-tuned: adaptation is greatest when the adaptor and probe lie on the same chromatic axis. Previous fMRI data from our lab also suggests S-cone adaptation results in a paradoxical increase in post-stimulus BOLD signal. Here, we use SSVEP and pupillometry to ask whether we can measure physiological correlates of this adaptation. SSVEPs were recorded from V1 using a canonical EEG template (Poncet & Ales, 2023) and pupil diameter was measured using an EyeLink1000 for 21 participants. Stimuli were contrast-reversing chromatic or luminance disks (5Hz, 20° visual angle) presented during a 7s preprobe, 30s adaptation, and 7s probe period. The preprobe and probe were always the same chromaticity at 50% of the adapting contrast. Stimuli were L+M or S-cone isolating with four conditions overall (S/L+M) * (adapt/probe). Both pupils and V1 show an increase in size and response respectively after adaptation, contradicting the idea that adaptation reduces contrast sensitivity. Pupil data showed L+M adaptation increases pupil diameter more for L+M than S probe, with S adaptation having little effect. V1 showed an overall effect of adaptation, but no differences across conditions suggesting that the pupils are more sensitive to chromaticity in adaptation, while cortex shows adaptation independent of chromaticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 5","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poster Session: Chromatic and luminance contrast adaptation measured using pupillometry and SSVEP.\",\"authors\":\"Alex A Carter, Abbie J Lawton, Daniel H Baker, Antony B Morland, Lauren E Welbourne, Alex R Wade\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/jov.25.5.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous evidence suggests both chromatic and luminance contrast adaptation reduces contrast sensitivity in the post-adaptation period. This effect is chromatically-tuned: adaptation is greatest when the adaptor and probe lie on the same chromatic axis. Previous fMRI data from our lab also suggests S-cone adaptation results in a paradoxical increase in post-stimulus BOLD signal. Here, we use SSVEP and pupillometry to ask whether we can measure physiological correlates of this adaptation. SSVEPs were recorded from V1 using a canonical EEG template (Poncet & Ales, 2023) and pupil diameter was measured using an EyeLink1000 for 21 participants. Stimuli were contrast-reversing chromatic or luminance disks (5Hz, 20° visual angle) presented during a 7s preprobe, 30s adaptation, and 7s probe period. The preprobe and probe were always the same chromaticity at 50% of the adapting contrast. Stimuli were L+M or S-cone isolating with four conditions overall (S/L+M) * (adapt/probe). Both pupils and V1 show an increase in size and response respectively after adaptation, contradicting the idea that adaptation reduces contrast sensitivity. Pupil data showed L+M adaptation increases pupil diameter more for L+M than S probe, with S adaptation having little effect. V1 showed an overall effect of adaptation, but no differences across conditions suggesting that the pupils are more sensitive to chromaticity in adaptation, while cortex shows adaptation independent of chromaticity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"volume\":\"25 5\",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.5.21\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.5.21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的证据表明,色度和亮度对比度适应都会降低适应后的对比敏感性。这种效果是色度调谐的:当适配器和探针位于同一色度轴上时,适应性最强。我们实验室之前的fMRI数据也表明,s锥适应导致刺激后BOLD信号的矛盾增加。在这里,我们使用SSVEP和瞳孔测量来询问我们是否可以测量这种适应的生理相关性。使用标准EEG模板(Poncet & Ales, 2023)从V1开始记录ssvep,并使用EyeLink1000测量21名参与者的瞳孔直径。刺激是对比反转色度或亮度盘(5Hz, 20°视角),分别在7s预探测、30s适应和7s探测期间呈现。预探针和探针在适应对比度的50%时总是相同的色度。刺激是L+M或S-锥隔离,总共有四种条件(S/L+M) *(适应/探针)。瞳孔和V1在适应后分别表现出尺寸和反应的增加,这与适应降低对比敏感度的观点相矛盾。瞳孔数据显示,L+M探针对瞳孔直径的影响大于S探针,S探针对瞳孔直径的影响较小。V1表现出适应的整体效应,但在不同条件下没有差异,这表明瞳孔在适应中对色度更敏感,而皮层则表现出独立于色度的适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poster Session: Chromatic and luminance contrast adaptation measured using pupillometry and SSVEP.

Previous evidence suggests both chromatic and luminance contrast adaptation reduces contrast sensitivity in the post-adaptation period. This effect is chromatically-tuned: adaptation is greatest when the adaptor and probe lie on the same chromatic axis. Previous fMRI data from our lab also suggests S-cone adaptation results in a paradoxical increase in post-stimulus BOLD signal. Here, we use SSVEP and pupillometry to ask whether we can measure physiological correlates of this adaptation. SSVEPs were recorded from V1 using a canonical EEG template (Poncet & Ales, 2023) and pupil diameter was measured using an EyeLink1000 for 21 participants. Stimuli were contrast-reversing chromatic or luminance disks (5Hz, 20° visual angle) presented during a 7s preprobe, 30s adaptation, and 7s probe period. The preprobe and probe were always the same chromaticity at 50% of the adapting contrast. Stimuli were L+M or S-cone isolating with four conditions overall (S/L+M) * (adapt/probe). Both pupils and V1 show an increase in size and response respectively after adaptation, contradicting the idea that adaptation reduces contrast sensitivity. Pupil data showed L+M adaptation increases pupil diameter more for L+M than S probe, with S adaptation having little effect. V1 showed an overall effect of adaptation, but no differences across conditions suggesting that the pupils are more sensitive to chromaticity in adaptation, while cortex shows adaptation independent of chromaticity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信