慢性阻塞性肺病频繁加重的生物标志物(NLR, PLR, SII):一项回顾性研究的诊断和临床管理意义

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yufen Fu, Yuxin Wang, Yujiao Wang, Ting Mou, Xiang He, Junyi Wang, Anying Xiong, Bomiao Qing, Dehong Wu, Guoping Li
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病频繁加重的生物标志物(NLR, PLR, SII):一项回顾性研究的诊断和临床管理意义","authors":"Yufen Fu, Yuxin Wang, Yujiao Wang, Ting Mou, Xiang He, Junyi Wang, Anying Xiong, Bomiao Qing, Dehong Wu, Guoping Li","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S510118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic and predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) for frequent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), and to develop a risk stratification scoring system to optimize clinical management in resource-limited healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study enrolled 16,849 AECOPD patients, categorized into frequent exacerbators (≥2 exacerbations/year, n=3,488) and non-frequent exacerbators (<2 exacerbations/year, n=13,361). Comparative analyses of clinical characteristics and inflammatory biomarkers (NLR, PLR, SII, CRP, PCT) were conducted. Spearman correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and binary logistic regression were employed to assess biomarker performance. A risk scoring system was developed using odds ratios (OR) and regression coefficients (β) of NLR and PLR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequent exacerbators group exhibited significantly higher median NLR (6.71 vs 5.10, P < 0.001), mean PLR (239 ± 204 vs 218 ± 195, P < 0.001), and median SII (1,137.48 vs 847.54, P < 0.001). NLR, PLR and SII showed strong positive correlations with CRP and PCT (P < 0.001). ROC analysis identified NLR (specificity = 84.1%) and PLR (sensitivity = 55%) as optimal diagnostic indicators. Regression analysis confirmed NLR and PLR as independent risk factors for frequent exacerbations. The risk stratification system categorized patients into low-risk (<290 points; annual exacerbation rate 17%), intermediate-risk (290-768 points; 19.1%), and high-risk (>768 points; 23.4%) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLR and PLR serve as cost-effective biomarkers for identifying high-risk frequent exacerbators patients with COPD in primary care settings. The percentile-based scoring system enables management strategies to address clinical needs in resource-constrained healthcare environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"987-998"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomarkers (NLR, PLR, SII) for Frequent COPD Exacerbations: Diagnostic and Clinical Management Implications in a Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yufen Fu, Yuxin Wang, Yujiao Wang, Ting Mou, Xiang He, Junyi Wang, Anying Xiong, Bomiao Qing, Dehong Wu, Guoping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/COPD.S510118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic and predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) for frequent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), and to develop a risk stratification scoring system to optimize clinical management in resource-limited healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study enrolled 16,849 AECOPD patients, categorized into frequent exacerbators (≥2 exacerbations/year, n=3,488) and non-frequent exacerbators (<2 exacerbations/year, n=13,361). Comparative analyses of clinical characteristics and inflammatory biomarkers (NLR, PLR, SII, CRP, PCT) were conducted. Spearman correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and binary logistic regression were employed to assess biomarker performance. A risk scoring system was developed using odds ratios (OR) and regression coefficients (β) of NLR and PLR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequent exacerbators group exhibited significantly higher median NLR (6.71 vs 5.10, P < 0.001), mean PLR (239 ± 204 vs 218 ± 195, P < 0.001), and median SII (1,137.48 vs 847.54, P < 0.001). NLR, PLR and SII showed strong positive correlations with CRP and PCT (P < 0.001). ROC analysis identified NLR (specificity = 84.1%) and PLR (sensitivity = 55%) as optimal diagnostic indicators. Regression analysis confirmed NLR and PLR as independent risk factors for frequent exacerbations. The risk stratification system categorized patients into low-risk (<290 points; annual exacerbation rate 17%), intermediate-risk (290-768 points; 19.1%), and high-risk (>768 points; 23.4%) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLR and PLR serve as cost-effective biomarkers for identifying high-risk frequent exacerbators patients with COPD in primary care settings. The percentile-based scoring system enables management strategies to address clinical needs in resource-constrained healthcare environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"987-998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980941/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S510118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S510118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)频繁加重的诊断和预测价值,并建立风险分层评分系统,以优化资源有限的医疗机构的临床管理。患者和方法:本回顾性观察性研究纳入16849例AECOPD患者,分为频繁加重组(≥2次/年,n= 3488)和非频繁加重组(结果:频繁加重组的中位NLR (6.71 vs 5.10, P < 0.001)、平均PLR(239±204 vs 218±195,P < 0.001)和中位SII (1137.48 vs 847.54, P < 0.001)显著高于急性加重组。NLR、PLR、SII与CRP、PCT呈显著正相关(P < 0.001)。ROC分析确定NLR(特异性= 84.1%)和PLR(敏感性= 55%)为最佳诊断指标。回归分析证实NLR和PLR是频繁加重的独立危险因素。风险分层系统将患者分为低危(768分;23.4%)组。结论:NLR和PLR可作为一种具有成本效益的生物标志物,用于在初级保健机构中识别高风险、频繁加重的COPD患者。基于百分位数的评分系统使管理策略能够在资源有限的医疗保健环境中满足临床需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomarkers (NLR, PLR, SII) for Frequent COPD Exacerbations: Diagnostic and Clinical Management Implications in a Retrospective Study.

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic and predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) for frequent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), and to develop a risk stratification scoring system to optimize clinical management in resource-limited healthcare settings.

Patients and methods: This retrospective observational study enrolled 16,849 AECOPD patients, categorized into frequent exacerbators (≥2 exacerbations/year, n=3,488) and non-frequent exacerbators (<2 exacerbations/year, n=13,361). Comparative analyses of clinical characteristics and inflammatory biomarkers (NLR, PLR, SII, CRP, PCT) were conducted. Spearman correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and binary logistic regression were employed to assess biomarker performance. A risk scoring system was developed using odds ratios (OR) and regression coefficients (β) of NLR and PLR.

Results: The frequent exacerbators group exhibited significantly higher median NLR (6.71 vs 5.10, P < 0.001), mean PLR (239 ± 204 vs 218 ± 195, P < 0.001), and median SII (1,137.48 vs 847.54, P < 0.001). NLR, PLR and SII showed strong positive correlations with CRP and PCT (P < 0.001). ROC analysis identified NLR (specificity = 84.1%) and PLR (sensitivity = 55%) as optimal diagnostic indicators. Regression analysis confirmed NLR and PLR as independent risk factors for frequent exacerbations. The risk stratification system categorized patients into low-risk (<290 points; annual exacerbation rate 17%), intermediate-risk (290-768 points; 19.1%), and high-risk (>768 points; 23.4%) groups.

Conclusion: NLR and PLR serve as cost-effective biomarkers for identifying high-risk frequent exacerbators patients with COPD in primary care settings. The percentile-based scoring system enables management strategies to address clinical needs in resource-constrained healthcare environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信