国家共病调查-复现(NCS-R)中人格解体/现实感丧失及其与情绪和焦虑障碍的关系

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Daphne Simeon, Dan J Stein
{"title":"国家共病调查-复现(NCS-R)中人格解体/现实感丧失及其与情绪和焦虑障碍的关系","authors":"Daphne Simeon, Dan J Stein","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02915-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depersonalization/derealization (dpdr) is known to occur across mood and anxiety disorders (MAD) and has been proposed as a marker of worse illness. However, despite the well-known clinical association, there are no epidemiological data on the relationship between dpdr and MAD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this NCS-R analysis clinically significant dpdr (DPDR-C) was defined as \"sometimes\" or \"often\" past-month endorsement of depersonalization and/or derealization in the absence of other pathological dissociation. Six past-month MAD diagnoses were examined: DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social phobia, major depression, bipolar I, and bipolar II.  RESULTS: National DPDR-C one-month prevalence was 0.9%. After excluding all cases with past-month posttraumatic stress disorder or non-dpdr pathological dissociation, 21.2% of DPDR-C cases were accounted for by MAD while 3.0% of MAD cases endorsed DPDR-C, ranging from 0% (generalized anxiety disorder) to 11.8% (comorbid mood and anxiety disorder). DPDR-C was not uniquely related to any MAD disorder, and was not associated with MAD age of onset, chronicity, or impairment. Rather, DPDR-C was significantly associated with number of comorbid MAD disorders and with mood/anxiety comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At the epidemiologic level DPDR-C was uncommon in MAD but was more likely to occur in the presence of combined mood and anxiety disturbance, which may cause greater disruption to the usual sense of self and thus trigger unreality experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depersonalization/derealization and its relationship to mood and anxiety disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication (NCS-R).\",\"authors\":\"Daphne Simeon, Dan J Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00127-025-02915-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depersonalization/derealization (dpdr) is known to occur across mood and anxiety disorders (MAD) and has been proposed as a marker of worse illness. However, despite the well-known clinical association, there are no epidemiological data on the relationship between dpdr and MAD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this NCS-R analysis clinically significant dpdr (DPDR-C) was defined as \\\"sometimes\\\" or \\\"often\\\" past-month endorsement of depersonalization and/or derealization in the absence of other pathological dissociation. Six past-month MAD diagnoses were examined: DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social phobia, major depression, bipolar I, and bipolar II.  RESULTS: National DPDR-C one-month prevalence was 0.9%. After excluding all cases with past-month posttraumatic stress disorder or non-dpdr pathological dissociation, 21.2% of DPDR-C cases were accounted for by MAD while 3.0% of MAD cases endorsed DPDR-C, ranging from 0% (generalized anxiety disorder) to 11.8% (comorbid mood and anxiety disorder). DPDR-C was not uniquely related to any MAD disorder, and was not associated with MAD age of onset, chronicity, or impairment. Rather, DPDR-C was significantly associated with number of comorbid MAD disorders and with mood/anxiety comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At the epidemiologic level DPDR-C was uncommon in MAD but was more likely to occur in the presence of combined mood and anxiety disturbance, which may cause greater disruption to the usual sense of self and thus trigger unreality experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02915-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02915-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人格解体/现实感丧失(dpdr)已知发生在情绪和焦虑障碍(MAD)中,并被认为是疾病恶化的标志。然而,尽管众所周知的临床关联,没有关于dpdr和MAD之间关系的流行病学数据。方法:在这项NCS-R分析中,临床上显著的dpdr (ddr - c)被定义为在没有其他病理性分离的情况下,“有时”或“经常”在过去一个月出现人格解体和/或现实感丧失。过去六个月的MAD诊断被检查:DSM-IV广泛性焦虑症、恐慌症、社交恐惧症、重度抑郁症、双相情感障碍I和双相情感障碍II。结果:全国ddr - c一个月患病率为0.9%。在排除所有过去一个月的创伤后应激障碍或非dpdr病理性分离的病例后,21.2%的DPDR-C病例为MAD,而3.0%的MAD病例支持DPDR-C,范围从0%(广泛性焦虑障碍)到11.8%(共病情绪和焦虑障碍)。ddr - c与任何MAD疾病无关,也与MAD发病年龄、慢性或损害无关。相反,ddr - c与MAD共病的数量和情绪/焦虑共病显著相关。结论:在流行病学水平上,ddr - c在MAD中并不常见,但在合并情绪和焦虑障碍的情况下更容易发生,这可能对通常的自我意识造成更大的破坏,从而引发不现实体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Depersonalization/derealization and its relationship to mood and anxiety disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication (NCS-R).

Background: Depersonalization/derealization (dpdr) is known to occur across mood and anxiety disorders (MAD) and has been proposed as a marker of worse illness. However, despite the well-known clinical association, there are no epidemiological data on the relationship between dpdr and MAD.

Method: In this NCS-R analysis clinically significant dpdr (DPDR-C) was defined as "sometimes" or "often" past-month endorsement of depersonalization and/or derealization in the absence of other pathological dissociation. Six past-month MAD diagnoses were examined: DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social phobia, major depression, bipolar I, and bipolar II.  RESULTS: National DPDR-C one-month prevalence was 0.9%. After excluding all cases with past-month posttraumatic stress disorder or non-dpdr pathological dissociation, 21.2% of DPDR-C cases were accounted for by MAD while 3.0% of MAD cases endorsed DPDR-C, ranging from 0% (generalized anxiety disorder) to 11.8% (comorbid mood and anxiety disorder). DPDR-C was not uniquely related to any MAD disorder, and was not associated with MAD age of onset, chronicity, or impairment. Rather, DPDR-C was significantly associated with number of comorbid MAD disorders and with mood/anxiety comorbidity.

Conclusion: At the epidemiologic level DPDR-C was uncommon in MAD but was more likely to occur in the presence of combined mood and anxiety disturbance, which may cause greater disruption to the usual sense of self and thus trigger unreality experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信