拉丁美洲大流行病防范和应对优先事项:区域德尔菲共识。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
César Arturo Méndez Lizárraga, Ruben Armas-González, Steev Loyola, Alfredo Bruno, Victoria Pando-Robles, Julián Alfredo Fernández-Niño, Reynaldo Flores Muñoz, Josefina Coloma, Andrés G Lescano, Enrique Bravo-García, Patricia J García, Juan Garza, Esbeydy Pardo, Susie Welty, Michael J A Reid, Jaime Sepúlveda
{"title":"拉丁美洲大流行病防范和应对优先事项:区域德尔菲共识。","authors":"César Arturo Méndez Lizárraga, Ruben Armas-González, Steev Loyola, Alfredo Bruno, Victoria Pando-Robles, Julián Alfredo Fernández-Niño, Reynaldo Flores Muñoz, Josefina Coloma, Andrés G Lescano, Enrique Bravo-García, Patricia J García, Juan Garza, Esbeydy Pardo, Susie Welty, Michael J A Reid, Jaime Sepúlveda","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response issued a series of recommendations for future pandemic preparedness and response. Latin America's COVID-19-related deaths represented 25 % of the global demises, despite harboring less than 8 % of the world's population. As little data exists to support whether the Panel's recommendations reflect public health professionals' priorities in the region the study aimed to define these priorities utilizing a Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A consensus-building modified Delphi technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the first two rounds, participants were asked to rank a list of topics across seven domains on a 4-point Likert scale. Topics voted by at least 75 % of participants in either round as very important were included in the final round. Participants ranked the topics from each of the seven domains in numeric order to define top priorities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 115 responses were obtained across three rounds. Most respondents were involved in direct efforts against COVID-19 (75·0-86·%) and a considerable proportion had more than 16 years of public health experience (37·3-50·0 %). The top priority issues were zoonotic disease-pathogen surveillance systems (27·4 points), robust infection and prevention control programs (22·8 points), and indicator and event-based monitoring and reporting systems (22·1 points).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Establishing priorities for future pandemics is critical to ensure better health outcomes. The region should strengthen collaboration and enhance its capacities while conducting country-level analysis and defining priorities for future arrangements.</p>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"105602"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pandemic preparedness and response priorities in Latin America: A regional Delphi consensus.\",\"authors\":\"César Arturo Méndez Lizárraga, Ruben Armas-González, Steev Loyola, Alfredo Bruno, Victoria Pando-Robles, Julián Alfredo Fernández-Niño, Reynaldo Flores Muñoz, Josefina Coloma, Andrés G Lescano, Enrique Bravo-García, Patricia J García, Juan Garza, Esbeydy Pardo, Susie Welty, Michael J A Reid, Jaime Sepúlveda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response issued a series of recommendations for future pandemic preparedness and response. Latin America's COVID-19-related deaths represented 25 % of the global demises, despite harboring less than 8 % of the world's population. As little data exists to support whether the Panel's recommendations reflect public health professionals' priorities in the region the study aimed to define these priorities utilizing a Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A consensus-building modified Delphi technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the first two rounds, participants were asked to rank a list of topics across seven domains on a 4-point Likert scale. Topics voted by at least 75 % of participants in either round as very important were included in the final round. Participants ranked the topics from each of the seven domains in numeric order to define top priorities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 115 responses were obtained across three rounds. Most respondents were involved in direct efforts against COVID-19 (75·0-86·%) and a considerable proportion had more than 16 years of public health experience (37·3-50·0 %). The top priority issues were zoonotic disease-pathogen surveillance systems (27·4 points), robust infection and prevention control programs (22·8 points), and indicator and event-based monitoring and reporting systems (22·1 points).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Establishing priorities for future pandemics is critical to ensure better health outcomes. The region should strengthen collaboration and enhance its capacities while conducting country-level analysis and defining priorities for future arrangements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:大流行防范和应对独立小组发布了一系列关于未来大流行防范和应对的建议。拉丁美洲的人口不到世界人口的8%,但与covid -19相关的死亡人数占全球死亡人数的25%。由于几乎没有数据支持小组的建议是否反映了该区域公共卫生专业人员的优先事项,因此研究旨在利用德尔菲研究确定这些优先事项。研究设计:建立共识的改进德尔菲法。方法:在前两轮,参与者被要求在4分李克特量表上对七个领域的主题列表进行排名。在每一轮中至少有75%的参与者投票认为非常重要的话题被纳入最后一轮。参与者将七个领域中的主题按数字顺序排列,以确定优先级。结果:三轮共获得115个应答。大多数受访者直接参与了抗击COVID-19的工作(75.0% ~ 86.0%),相当大比例的受访者拥有16年以上的公共卫生经验(37.3% ~ 50.0%)。最重要的问题是人畜共患疾病-病原体监测系统(27.4分),健全的感染和预防控制程序(22.8分),以及基于指标和事件的监测和报告系统(22.1分)。结论:确定未来大流行的优先事项对于确保更好的健康结果至关重要。本区域应加强协作和提高能力,同时进行国家一级的分析和确定未来安排的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pandemic preparedness and response priorities in Latin America: A regional Delphi consensus.

Objective: The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response issued a series of recommendations for future pandemic preparedness and response. Latin America's COVID-19-related deaths represented 25 % of the global demises, despite harboring less than 8 % of the world's population. As little data exists to support whether the Panel's recommendations reflect public health professionals' priorities in the region the study aimed to define these priorities utilizing a Delphi study.

Study design: A consensus-building modified Delphi technique.

Methods: For the first two rounds, participants were asked to rank a list of topics across seven domains on a 4-point Likert scale. Topics voted by at least 75 % of participants in either round as very important were included in the final round. Participants ranked the topics from each of the seven domains in numeric order to define top priorities.

Results: A total of 115 responses were obtained across three rounds. Most respondents were involved in direct efforts against COVID-19 (75·0-86·%) and a considerable proportion had more than 16 years of public health experience (37·3-50·0 %). The top priority issues were zoonotic disease-pathogen surveillance systems (27·4 points), robust infection and prevention control programs (22·8 points), and indicator and event-based monitoring and reporting systems (22·1 points).

Conclusions: Establishing priorities for future pandemics is critical to ensure better health outcomes. The region should strengthen collaboration and enhance its capacities while conducting country-level analysis and defining priorities for future arrangements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信