偏心循环对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者摄氧量和血流动力学的影响——一项随机对照交叉试验

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respiration Pub Date : 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1159/000545787
Aldo Kammerlander, Simon Raphael Schneider, Michael Furian, Esther Irene Schwarz, Mona Lichtblau, Silvia Ulrich, Julian Müller
{"title":"偏心循环对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者摄氧量和血流动力学的影响——一项随机对照交叉试验","authors":"Aldo Kammerlander, Simon Raphael Schneider, Michael Furian, Esther Irene Schwarz, Mona Lichtblau, Silvia Ulrich, Julian Müller","doi":"10.1159/000545787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and contributes significantly to reduced quality of life due to symptoms such as dyspnea and exercise intolerance. Eccentric cycling exercise (ECC) has shown potential as an alternative to conventional concentric cycling exercise (CON) in cardiopulmonary disease, including COPD, as it has a lower metabolic demand and potentially allows for higher exercise intensity with less perceived exertion. We aimed to compare ventilatory and circulatory responses of COPD patients between ECC and CON at identical submaximal workloads.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized-controlled crossover trial, 17 COPD patients (6 female, mean ± SD age 67 ± 7 years) completed identical submaximal stepwise incremental cycling tests using ECC and CON, each step increasing by 10 W. The main outcome was oxygen uptake (<inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m1\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Additional outcomes were breath-by-breath ergospirometric measurements including minute ventilation (<inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m2\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and hemodynamics by echocardiography at each step.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a mean end-exercise intensity of 41.3 ± 3.5 W, ECC lowered <inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m3\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by -122 mL/min (-25%, 95% CI: -213 to -47, p = 0.005) and <inline-formula><mml:math id=\"m4\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by -5.7 L/min (-29%, 95% CI: -10.0 to -1.6, p = 0.012) compared to CON. Perceived dyspnea and leg fatigue did not differ. A trend toward reduced strain on the right ventricle was observed in ECC (37 ± 13 mm Hg ECC vs. 48 ± 7 mm Hg CON), but this was not significant (p = 0.063). No adverse events occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECC allowed COPD patients to exercise at the same workload but with a lower metabolic and ventilatory demand compared to CON, suggesting it has the potential to further improve exercise capacity in pulmonary rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Eccentric Cycling on Oxygen Uptake and Hemodynamics in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Aldo Kammerlander, Simon Raphael Schneider, Michael Furian, Esther Irene Schwarz, Mona Lichtblau, Silvia Ulrich, Julian Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and contributes significantly to reduced quality of life due to symptoms such as dyspnea and exercise intolerance. Eccentric cycling exercise (ECC) has shown potential as an alternative to conventional concentric cycling exercise (CON) in cardiopulmonary disease, including COPD, as it has a lower metabolic demand and potentially allows for higher exercise intensity with less perceived exertion. We aimed to compare ventilatory and circulatory responses of COPD patients between ECC and CON at identical submaximal workloads.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized-controlled crossover trial, 17 COPD patients (6 female, mean ± SD age 67 ± 7 years) completed identical submaximal stepwise incremental cycling tests using ECC and CON, each step increasing by 10 W. The main outcome was oxygen uptake (<inline-formula><mml:math id=\\\"m1\\\" xmlns:mml=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\\\"true\\\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Additional outcomes were breath-by-breath ergospirometric measurements including minute ventilation (<inline-formula><mml:math id=\\\"m2\\\" xmlns:mml=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\\\"true\\\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and hemodynamics by echocardiography at each step.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a mean end-exercise intensity of 41.3 ± 3.5 W, ECC lowered <inline-formula><mml:math id=\\\"m3\\\" xmlns:mml=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\\\"true\\\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by -122 mL/min (-25%, 95% CI: -213 to -47, p = 0.005) and <inline-formula><mml:math id=\\\"m4\\\" xmlns:mml=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\\\"true\\\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by -5.7 L/min (-29%, 95% CI: -10.0 to -1.6, p = 0.012) compared to CON. Perceived dyspnea and leg fatigue did not differ. A trend toward reduced strain on the right ventricle was observed in ECC (37 ± 13 mm Hg ECC vs. 48 ± 7 mm Hg CON), but this was not significant (p = 0.063). No adverse events occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECC allowed COPD patients to exercise at the same workload but with a lower metabolic and ventilatory demand compared to CON, suggesting it has the potential to further improve exercise capacity in pulmonary rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiration\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101805/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545787\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是世界范围内发病率和死亡率的主要原因,并且由于呼吸困难和运动不耐受等症状导致生活质量下降。偏心自行车运动(ECC)已显示出作为传统同心自行车运动(CON)在包括慢性阻塞性肺病在内的心肺疾病中的替代方案的潜力,因为它具有较低的代谢需求,并且可能在较少的运动强度下实现更高的运动强度。研究问题:在相同的次最大负荷下,ECC和CON对COPD患者的通气和循环反应有何不同?方法:在一项随机对照交叉试验中,17例COPD患者(6例女性,平均±SD年龄67±7岁)使用ECC和CON完成相同的亚最大值逐步增量循环试验,每步增加10W。主要观察指标为摄氧量(vo2)。其他结果是每一步通过超声心动图进行的呼吸量肺测量,包括分钟通气(V (E))和血流动力学。结果:在平均运动结束强度为41.3±3.5W时,与对照组相比,ECC降低了-122mL/min (-25%, 95%CI -213 ~ -47, P=0.005)和-5.7L/min (-29%, 95%CI -10.0 ~ -1.6, P=0.012),感知到的呼吸困难和腿部疲劳没有差异。ECC组右心室应变有减小的趋势(ECC组37±13mmHg, CON组48±7mmHg),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.063)。无不良事件发生。结论:与CON相比,ECC可使COPD患者在相同负荷下进行运动,但代谢和通气需求较低,这表明ECC具有进一步提高肺康复运动能力的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Eccentric Cycling on Oxygen Uptake and Hemodynamics in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and contributes significantly to reduced quality of life due to symptoms such as dyspnea and exercise intolerance. Eccentric cycling exercise (ECC) has shown potential as an alternative to conventional concentric cycling exercise (CON) in cardiopulmonary disease, including COPD, as it has a lower metabolic demand and potentially allows for higher exercise intensity with less perceived exertion. We aimed to compare ventilatory and circulatory responses of COPD patients between ECC and CON at identical submaximal workloads.

Methods: In a randomized-controlled crossover trial, 17 COPD patients (6 female, mean ± SD age 67 ± 7 years) completed identical submaximal stepwise incremental cycling tests using ECC and CON, each step increasing by 10 W. The main outcome was oxygen uptake (V˙O2). Additional outcomes were breath-by-breath ergospirometric measurements including minute ventilation (V˙E) and hemodynamics by echocardiography at each step.

Results: At a mean end-exercise intensity of 41.3 ± 3.5 W, ECC lowered V˙O2 by -122 mL/min (-25%, 95% CI: -213 to -47, p = 0.005) and V˙E by -5.7 L/min (-29%, 95% CI: -10.0 to -1.6, p = 0.012) compared to CON. Perceived dyspnea and leg fatigue did not differ. A trend toward reduced strain on the right ventricle was observed in ECC (37 ± 13 mm Hg ECC vs. 48 ± 7 mm Hg CON), but this was not significant (p = 0.063). No adverse events occurred.

Conclusion: ECC allowed COPD patients to exercise at the same workload but with a lower metabolic and ventilatory demand compared to CON, suggesting it has the potential to further improve exercise capacity in pulmonary rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信