局部晚期直肠癌在老年和非老年患者中的根治性治疗结果。

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5603/rpor.104387
Abrahams Ocanto, Ramón Cantero, Rosa Morera, Raquel Ramírez, Isabel Rodríguez, Katherine Castillo, Pilar Samper, Felipe Couñago
{"title":"局部晚期直肠癌在老年和非老年患者中的根治性治疗结果。","authors":"Abrahams Ocanto, Ramón Cantero, Rosa Morera, Raquel Ramírez, Isabel Rodríguez, Katherine Castillo, Pilar Samper, Felipe Couñago","doi":"10.5603/rpor.104387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is estimated that 60% of new rectal cancer cases will be diagnosed in patients ≥ 65 years old. The geriatric patient is heterogeneous and underrepresented in clinical trials, and oncologic therapies are often tailored with little evidence. We describe a cohort of patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer in geriatric and non-geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective and descriptive analysis of 137 patients, 44 (32.1%) ≥ 75 years old and 93 (67.9%) ≤ 75 years old, with diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 79.5 for ≥ 75 years and 62.7 for ≤ 75 years, tumor location was: upper rectum (16.1% and 11.3%), middle rectum (60.2% and 47.7%) and lower rectum (23.7% and 41%), using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0: 74.1% and 81.8%, ECOG 1: 25.9% and 18.2%. Pathological complete response was 21.5% and 22.7%, partial response, 57% and 59% and no response, 21.5% and 18.3%, respectively. Tumor shrinkage in both groups after neoadjuvant treatment was 34.5% and 35.46%. Local recurrence was 2.2% and 3.2% and distance recurrence, 11.3% and 8.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study shows similar outcomes in both groups following radical treatment, with similar rates of pathological complete response. However, it has notable limitations, including a small sample size and the absence of a comprehensive geriatric assessment. To enhance these findings, future research should involve larger patient cohorts with comparative analysis and clinical trials specifically focused on the geriatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47283,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","volume":"30 1","pages":"54-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of radical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in geriatric and non-geriatric patients.\",\"authors\":\"Abrahams Ocanto, Ramón Cantero, Rosa Morera, Raquel Ramírez, Isabel Rodríguez, Katherine Castillo, Pilar Samper, Felipe Couñago\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/rpor.104387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is estimated that 60% of new rectal cancer cases will be diagnosed in patients ≥ 65 years old. The geriatric patient is heterogeneous and underrepresented in clinical trials, and oncologic therapies are often tailored with little evidence. We describe a cohort of patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer in geriatric and non-geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective and descriptive analysis of 137 patients, 44 (32.1%) ≥ 75 years old and 93 (67.9%) ≤ 75 years old, with diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 79.5 for ≥ 75 years and 62.7 for ≤ 75 years, tumor location was: upper rectum (16.1% and 11.3%), middle rectum (60.2% and 47.7%) and lower rectum (23.7% and 41%), using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0: 74.1% and 81.8%, ECOG 1: 25.9% and 18.2%. Pathological complete response was 21.5% and 22.7%, partial response, 57% and 59% and no response, 21.5% and 18.3%, respectively. Tumor shrinkage in both groups after neoadjuvant treatment was 34.5% and 35.46%. Local recurrence was 2.2% and 3.2% and distance recurrence, 11.3% and 8.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study shows similar outcomes in both groups following radical treatment, with similar rates of pathological complete response. However, it has notable limitations, including a small sample size and the absence of a comprehensive geriatric assessment. To enhance these findings, future research should involve larger patient cohorts with comparative analysis and clinical trials specifically focused on the geriatric population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"54-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999012/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.104387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.104387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据估计,60%的新发直肠癌病例将在≥65岁的患者中被诊断出来。老年患者是异质性的,在临床试验中代表性不足,肿瘤治疗往往是在缺乏证据的情况下量身定制的。我们描述了一组被诊断为局部晚期直肠癌的老年和非老年患者。材料与方法:回顾性和描述性分析137例诊断为局部晚期直肠癌的患者,年龄≥75岁44例(32.1%),≤75岁93例(67.9%)。所有患者均接受新辅助放化疗(nCRT),然后进行全肠系膜切除术(TME)和辅助化疗。结果:≥75岁的平均年龄为79.5岁,≤75岁的平均年龄为62.7岁,肿瘤部位为:上直肠(16.1%和11.3%)、中直肠(60.2%和47.7%)和下直肠(23.7%和41%),采用东部肿瘤合作组(ECOG) 0: 74.1%和81.8%,ECOG 1: 25.9%和18.2%。病理完全缓解分别为21.5%和22.7%,部分缓解分别为57%和59%,无缓解分别为21.5%和18.3%。两组经新辅助治疗后肿瘤收缩率分别为34.5%和35.46%。局部复发率分别为2.2%和3.2%,远处复发率分别为11.3%和8.6%。结论:研究显示两组在根治后的结果相似,病理完全缓解率相似。然而,它有明显的局限性,包括样本量小和缺乏全面的老年评估。为了加强这些发现,未来的研究应该涉及更大的患者队列,进行比较分析和临床试验,特别是针对老年人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Results of radical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in geriatric and non-geriatric patients.

Background: It is estimated that 60% of new rectal cancer cases will be diagnosed in patients ≥ 65 years old. The geriatric patient is heterogeneous and underrepresented in clinical trials, and oncologic therapies are often tailored with little evidence. We describe a cohort of patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer in geriatric and non-geriatric patients.

Materials and methods: Retrospective and descriptive analysis of 137 patients, 44 (32.1%) ≥ 75 years old and 93 (67.9%) ≤ 75 years old, with diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results: Mean age was 79.5 for ≥ 75 years and 62.7 for ≤ 75 years, tumor location was: upper rectum (16.1% and 11.3%), middle rectum (60.2% and 47.7%) and lower rectum (23.7% and 41%), using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0: 74.1% and 81.8%, ECOG 1: 25.9% and 18.2%. Pathological complete response was 21.5% and 22.7%, partial response, 57% and 59% and no response, 21.5% and 18.3%, respectively. Tumor shrinkage in both groups after neoadjuvant treatment was 34.5% and 35.46%. Local recurrence was 2.2% and 3.2% and distance recurrence, 11.3% and 8.6%, respectively.

Conclusion: The study shows similar outcomes in both groups following radical treatment, with similar rates of pathological complete response. However, it has notable limitations, including a small sample size and the absence of a comprehensive geriatric assessment. To enhance these findings, future research should involve larger patient cohorts with comparative analysis and clinical trials specifically focused on the geriatric population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is an interdisciplinary bimonthly journal, publishing original contributions in clinical oncology and radiotherapy, as well as in radiotherapy physics, techniques and radiotherapy equipment. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is a journal of the Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, the Czech Society of Radiation Oncology, the Hungarian Society for Radiation Oncology, the Slovenian Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Polish Study Group of Head and Neck Cancer, the Guild of Bulgarian Radiotherapists and the Greater Poland Cancer Centre, affiliated with the Spanish Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and the Portuguese Society of Radiotherapy - Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信