机器人辅助干预(ROBERT®)增强脊髓损伤后髋屈肌的肌肉力量:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Susanne Lillelund Sørensen, Anette Bach Jønsson, Lisa Anne Harvey, Fin Biering-Sørensen, Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen
{"title":"机器人辅助干预(ROBERT®)增强脊髓损伤后髋屈肌的肌肉力量:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Susanne Lillelund Sørensen, Anette Bach Jønsson, Lisa Anne Harvey, Fin Biering-Sørensen, Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2488573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether a robotic-assisted intervention increases hip flexor muscle strength in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) and marked neurological weakness. The robotic-device (ROBERT®) supports the weight of the leg and guides it through assisted active or resisted active hip flexion movements.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pilot within-person randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Specialized SCI center in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve people with incomplete SCI <12 months, aged ≥18 and grade 1-3/5 strength on a Manual Muscle Test in the right and left hip flexor muscles were recruited. One leg of each person was randomised to receive additional ROBERT® treatment. All other care remained the same for both legs. Randomization was stratified based on hip flexor muscle strength. Treatment of the experimental leg consisted of 60 assisted active or resisted active hip flexion movements with the robotic device three times a week for eight weeks. The primary outcome was maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Secondary outcomes were root mean square of a surface electromyography signal, muscle thickness, the number of hip flexion movements per day, and self-reported perception of function and strength. Participants were assessed at baseline and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven out of 12 participants completed the study. There were no statistically significant between-group differences for MVIC (mean and 95% CI was -2.7 Nm, -8.1 to 2.7) or any of the secondary outcomes (except the number of hip flexion movements per day).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The robotic-assisted intervention did not increase hip flexor strength in people with incomplete SCI and marked neurological weakness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A robotic-assisted intervention (ROBERT®) to enhance muscle strength in the hip flexor muscles following spinal cord injury: A pilot within-person randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Lillelund Sørensen, Anette Bach Jønsson, Lisa Anne Harvey, Fin Biering-Sørensen, Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2025.2488573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether a robotic-assisted intervention increases hip flexor muscle strength in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) and marked neurological weakness. The robotic-device (ROBERT®) supports the weight of the leg and guides it through assisted active or resisted active hip flexion movements.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pilot within-person randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Specialized SCI center in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve people with incomplete SCI <12 months, aged ≥18 and grade 1-3/5 strength on a Manual Muscle Test in the right and left hip flexor muscles were recruited. One leg of each person was randomised to receive additional ROBERT® treatment. All other care remained the same for both legs. Randomization was stratified based on hip flexor muscle strength. Treatment of the experimental leg consisted of 60 assisted active or resisted active hip flexion movements with the robotic device three times a week for eight weeks. The primary outcome was maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Secondary outcomes were root mean square of a surface electromyography signal, muscle thickness, the number of hip flexion movements per day, and self-reported perception of function and strength. Participants were assessed at baseline and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven out of 12 participants completed the study. There were no statistically significant between-group differences for MVIC (mean and 95% CI was -2.7 Nm, -8.1 to 2.7) or any of the secondary outcomes (except the number of hip flexion movements per day).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The robotic-assisted intervention did not increase hip flexor strength in people with incomplete SCI and marked neurological weakness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2488573\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2488573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定机器人辅助干预是否能增加脊髓损伤(SCI)和明显神经衰弱患者的髋屈肌力量。机器人装置(ROBERT®)支持腿的重量,并引导它通过辅助主动或抵抗主动髋屈曲运动。研究设计:随机对照试验。环境:丹麦专门的SCI中心。方法:12例不完全性脊髓损伤患者结果:12名参与者中有11人完成了研究。MVIC(平均和95% CI为-2.7 Nm, -8.1至2.7 Nm)或任何次要结局(每天髋关节屈曲活动次数除外)组间差异无统计学意义。结论:机器人辅助干预不能增加不完全性脊髓损伤患者的髋屈肌力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A robotic-assisted intervention (ROBERT®) to enhance muscle strength in the hip flexor muscles following spinal cord injury: A pilot within-person randomized controlled trial.

Objective: To determine whether a robotic-assisted intervention increases hip flexor muscle strength in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) and marked neurological weakness. The robotic-device (ROBERT®) supports the weight of the leg and guides it through assisted active or resisted active hip flexion movements.

Study design: Pilot within-person randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Specialized SCI center in Denmark.

Methods: Twelve people with incomplete SCI <12 months, aged ≥18 and grade 1-3/5 strength on a Manual Muscle Test in the right and left hip flexor muscles were recruited. One leg of each person was randomised to receive additional ROBERT® treatment. All other care remained the same for both legs. Randomization was stratified based on hip flexor muscle strength. Treatment of the experimental leg consisted of 60 assisted active or resisted active hip flexion movements with the robotic device three times a week for eight weeks. The primary outcome was maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Secondary outcomes were root mean square of a surface electromyography signal, muscle thickness, the number of hip flexion movements per day, and self-reported perception of function and strength. Participants were assessed at baseline and post-intervention.

Results: Eleven out of 12 participants completed the study. There were no statistically significant between-group differences for MVIC (mean and 95% CI was -2.7 Nm, -8.1 to 2.7) or any of the secondary outcomes (except the number of hip flexion movements per day).

Conclusion: The robotic-assisted intervention did not increase hip flexor strength in people with incomplete SCI and marked neurological weakness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信