创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的生态瞬时评估测量的心理测量特性。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Rebecca C Cox, Kelly A Knowles, Sarah C Jessup, Bunmi O Olatunji
{"title":"创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的生态瞬时评估测量的心理测量特性。","authors":"Rebecca C Cox, Kelly A Knowles, Sarah C Jessup, Bunmi O Olatunji","doi":"10.1037/tra0001939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Daily variation in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms is obscured by traditional retrospective measures. The availability of a psychometrically valid ecological momentary assessment measure can facilitate understanding of how PTSD symptoms vary in real time and in naturalistic settings, increasing the possibility of just-in-time interventions. Accordingly, the present study examined the psychometric properties of a daily PTSD symptom measure (d-PCL).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adults with a history of sexual assault with (PTSD+ <i>n</i> = 22) and without PTSD (PTSD- <i>n</i> = 21) completed the d-PCL in the morning, afternoon, and evening for 1 week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The d-PCL total score distinguished the PTSD+ group from the PTSD- group (<i>p</i> < .05) and demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability in both groups. The d-PCL total score demonstrated good convergent validity with measures of depression and anxiety (<i>p</i>'s < .05). Examination of subscales revealed mixed findings for internal consistency, with only the reexperiencing subscale demonstrating adequate internal consistency at both the within- and between-participant levels in both groups. Evidence for test-retest reliability was likewise mixed, with only the hypervigilance subscale demonstrating acceptable test-retest reliability in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings offer initial psychometric support for the use of the d-PCL total score in ecological momentary assessment research examining daily fluctuations in PTSD symptoms. However, additional research is needed to clarify the parameters of ecological momentary assessment that may increase the psychometric validity of the d-PCL subscales. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of an ecological momentary assessment measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca C Cox, Kelly A Knowles, Sarah C Jessup, Bunmi O Olatunji\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Daily variation in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms is obscured by traditional retrospective measures. The availability of a psychometrically valid ecological momentary assessment measure can facilitate understanding of how PTSD symptoms vary in real time and in naturalistic settings, increasing the possibility of just-in-time interventions. Accordingly, the present study examined the psychometric properties of a daily PTSD symptom measure (d-PCL).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adults with a history of sexual assault with (PTSD+ <i>n</i> = 22) and without PTSD (PTSD- <i>n</i> = 21) completed the d-PCL in the morning, afternoon, and evening for 1 week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The d-PCL total score distinguished the PTSD+ group from the PTSD- group (<i>p</i> < .05) and demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability in both groups. The d-PCL total score demonstrated good convergent validity with measures of depression and anxiety (<i>p</i>'s < .05). Examination of subscales revealed mixed findings for internal consistency, with only the reexperiencing subscale demonstrating adequate internal consistency at both the within- and between-participant levels in both groups. Evidence for test-retest reliability was likewise mixed, with only the hypervigilance subscale demonstrating acceptable test-retest reliability in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings offer initial psychometric support for the use of the d-PCL total score in ecological momentary assessment research examining daily fluctuations in PTSD symptoms. However, additional research is needed to clarify the parameters of ecological momentary assessment that may increase the psychometric validity of the d-PCL subscales. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001939\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的日常变化被传统的回顾性测量所掩盖。一种心理测量学上有效的生态瞬间评估方法的可用性可以促进对PTSD症状在实时和自然环境中如何变化的理解,增加了及时干预的可能性。因此,本研究检查了每日PTSD症状测量(d-PCL)的心理测量特性。方法:有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD+ n = 22)和无创伤后应激障碍(PTSD- n = 21)的成人分别于1周的上午、下午和晚上完成d-PCL。结果:d-PCL总分将PTSD+组与PTSD-组区分开来(p < 0.05),两组均表现出可接受的内部一致性和重测信度。d-PCL总分与抑郁和焦虑量表具有良好的收敛效度(p < 0.05)。对子量表的检查揭示了内部一致性的混合结果,在两组中,只有再体验子量表在参与者内部和参与者之间的水平上显示出足够的内部一致性。重测信度的证据同样是混杂的,只有高警惕性分量表在两组中显示出可接受的重测信度。结论:这些发现为d-PCL总分在生态瞬时评估研究中检测PTSD症状的每日波动提供了初步的心理测量学支持。然而,需要进一步的研究来澄清生态瞬间评估的参数,这些参数可能会增加d-PCL子量表的心理测量效度。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric properties of an ecological momentary assessment measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms.

Objective: Daily variation in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms is obscured by traditional retrospective measures. The availability of a psychometrically valid ecological momentary assessment measure can facilitate understanding of how PTSD symptoms vary in real time and in naturalistic settings, increasing the possibility of just-in-time interventions. Accordingly, the present study examined the psychometric properties of a daily PTSD symptom measure (d-PCL).

Method: Adults with a history of sexual assault with (PTSD+ n = 22) and without PTSD (PTSD- n = 21) completed the d-PCL in the morning, afternoon, and evening for 1 week.

Results: The d-PCL total score distinguished the PTSD+ group from the PTSD- group (p < .05) and demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability in both groups. The d-PCL total score demonstrated good convergent validity with measures of depression and anxiety (p's < .05). Examination of subscales revealed mixed findings for internal consistency, with only the reexperiencing subscale demonstrating adequate internal consistency at both the within- and between-participant levels in both groups. Evidence for test-retest reliability was likewise mixed, with only the hypervigilance subscale demonstrating acceptable test-retest reliability in both groups.

Conclusions: These findings offer initial psychometric support for the use of the d-PCL total score in ecological momentary assessment research examining daily fluctuations in PTSD symptoms. However, additional research is needed to clarify the parameters of ecological momentary assessment that may increase the psychometric validity of the d-PCL subscales. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信