{"title":"双任务数字设备SDT-001治疗儿童和青少年注意力缺陷/多动障碍症状的有效性和安全性:一项随机、标准治疗对照的3期研究","authors":"Katsunaka Mikami, Tasuku Miyajima, Ryo Nishino, Naohiro Kawazoe, Yousuke Kinoshita, Takashi Okada, Hiroki Fukuju","doi":"10.1111/pcn.13833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This phase 3, multicenter, open-label study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SDT-001, a dual-task digital device, compared to standard treatment (environmental and/or psychosocial treatment: treatment as usual; TAU) in the comparison part and to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and long-term efficacy of SDT-001 in the repetition part in Japanese children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the comparison part, participants on standard treatment were randomized (2:1) to SDT-001 (n = 109; 25 min/day for 6 weeks, with a 4-week follow-up) or TAU (n = 55) groups. Participants (n = 126) from the comparison part transitioned to a single-arm repetition part with SDT-001 (6 weeks and followed for 12 weeks). Primary endpoint in the comparison part was changed from baseline to 6 weeks in ADHD rating scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) inattention scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the comparison part, SDT-001 demonstrated superiority to TAU, with significantly greater improvements from baseline to week 6 in ADHD-RS-IV inattention (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval], -2.97 [-4.38, -1.56]; P < 0.0001), total (-4.56 [-6.75, -2.38]; P < 0.0001), and hyperactivity-impulsivity (-1.55 [-2.64, -0.46]; P = 0.0056) scores. Additionally, other secondary endpoints showed improvements in symptoms in the SDT-001 group. In the repetition part, SDT-001 showed sustained reductions in ADHD-RS-IV scores till 12 weeks after completion of the 6-week treatment. No new severe adverse events or safety concerns were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SDT-001 demonstrated superior efficacy at week 6 in ADHD-RS-IV compared to TAU, and reductions in scores were maintained up to the following 12 weeks, indicating its potential as a novel digital therapeutic option for ADHD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20938,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of SDT-001, a dual-task digital device, in managing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children and adolescents: a phase 3, randomized, standard treatment-controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Katsunaka Mikami, Tasuku Miyajima, Ryo Nishino, Naohiro Kawazoe, Yousuke Kinoshita, Takashi Okada, Hiroki Fukuju\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pcn.13833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This phase 3, multicenter, open-label study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SDT-001, a dual-task digital device, compared to standard treatment (environmental and/or psychosocial treatment: treatment as usual; TAU) in the comparison part and to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and long-term efficacy of SDT-001 in the repetition part in Japanese children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the comparison part, participants on standard treatment were randomized (2:1) to SDT-001 (n = 109; 25 min/day for 6 weeks, with a 4-week follow-up) or TAU (n = 55) groups. Participants (n = 126) from the comparison part transitioned to a single-arm repetition part with SDT-001 (6 weeks and followed for 12 weeks). Primary endpoint in the comparison part was changed from baseline to 6 weeks in ADHD rating scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) inattention scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the comparison part, SDT-001 demonstrated superiority to TAU, with significantly greater improvements from baseline to week 6 in ADHD-RS-IV inattention (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval], -2.97 [-4.38, -1.56]; P < 0.0001), total (-4.56 [-6.75, -2.38]; P < 0.0001), and hyperactivity-impulsivity (-1.55 [-2.64, -0.46]; P = 0.0056) scores. Additionally, other secondary endpoints showed improvements in symptoms in the SDT-001 group. In the repetition part, SDT-001 showed sustained reductions in ADHD-RS-IV scores till 12 weeks after completion of the 6-week treatment. No new severe adverse events or safety concerns were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SDT-001 demonstrated superior efficacy at week 6 in ADHD-RS-IV compared to TAU, and reductions in scores were maintained up to the following 12 weeks, indicating its potential as a novel digital therapeutic option for ADHD management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of SDT-001, a dual-task digital device, in managing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children and adolescents: a phase 3, randomized, standard treatment-controlled study.
Aim: This phase 3, multicenter, open-label study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SDT-001, a dual-task digital device, compared to standard treatment (environmental and/or psychosocial treatment: treatment as usual; TAU) in the comparison part and to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and long-term efficacy of SDT-001 in the repetition part in Japanese children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Methods: In the comparison part, participants on standard treatment were randomized (2:1) to SDT-001 (n = 109; 25 min/day for 6 weeks, with a 4-week follow-up) or TAU (n = 55) groups. Participants (n = 126) from the comparison part transitioned to a single-arm repetition part with SDT-001 (6 weeks and followed for 12 weeks). Primary endpoint in the comparison part was changed from baseline to 6 weeks in ADHD rating scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) inattention scores.
Results: In the comparison part, SDT-001 demonstrated superiority to TAU, with significantly greater improvements from baseline to week 6 in ADHD-RS-IV inattention (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval], -2.97 [-4.38, -1.56]; P < 0.0001), total (-4.56 [-6.75, -2.38]; P < 0.0001), and hyperactivity-impulsivity (-1.55 [-2.64, -0.46]; P = 0.0056) scores. Additionally, other secondary endpoints showed improvements in symptoms in the SDT-001 group. In the repetition part, SDT-001 showed sustained reductions in ADHD-RS-IV scores till 12 weeks after completion of the 6-week treatment. No new severe adverse events or safety concerns were reported.
Conclusion: SDT-001 demonstrated superior efficacy at week 6 in ADHD-RS-IV compared to TAU, and reductions in scores were maintained up to the following 12 weeks, indicating its potential as a novel digital therapeutic option for ADHD management.
期刊介绍:
PCN (Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences)
Publication Frequency:
Published 12 online issues a year by JSPN
Content Categories:
Review Articles
Regular Articles
Letters to the Editor
Peer Review Process:
All manuscripts undergo peer review by anonymous reviewers, an Editorial Board Member, and the Editor
Publication Criteria:
Manuscripts are accepted based on quality, originality, and significance to the readership
Authors must confirm that the manuscript has not been published or submitted elsewhere and has been approved by each author