美国学术医疗机构的教师任期:对争议和辩论的批判性回顾。

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S508439
Anish Bhardwaj
{"title":"美国学术医疗机构的教师任期:对争议和辩论的批判性回顾。","authors":"Anish Bhardwaj","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S508439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For over a century, tenure has been a foundational tenet in American academic institutions, being synonymous with the concept of academic freedom. This concept has been extrapolated to US Academic Medical Institutions (AMIs) in multiple domains including teaching and research, sharing opinions as private citizens and on matters of institutional governance as well as providing clinicians, educators, scientists, and scholars opportunities for secure employment. In recent decades, however, there has been a steady erosion of the tenure system in US AMIs, and constituents suggest that this archaic construct would benefit from reform or even its complete abolition. The present treatise offers a historical perspective on the tenure system in AMIs, reviews the enthusiastic debate and controversies including the concomitant advantages, disadvantages, challenges, and the underlying reasons for its decline over the last few decades, and expounds on the ramifications of such trends. This exposition also discusses alternatives and reform to the tenure system which, if implemented, would still guarantee freedom in academic medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"569-576"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faculty Tenure in US Academic Medical Institutions: A Critical Review of Controversy and Debate.\",\"authors\":\"Anish Bhardwaj\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S508439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For over a century, tenure has been a foundational tenet in American academic institutions, being synonymous with the concept of academic freedom. This concept has been extrapolated to US Academic Medical Institutions (AMIs) in multiple domains including teaching and research, sharing opinions as private citizens and on matters of institutional governance as well as providing clinicians, educators, scientists, and scholars opportunities for secure employment. In recent decades, however, there has been a steady erosion of the tenure system in US AMIs, and constituents suggest that this archaic construct would benefit from reform or even its complete abolition. The present treatise offers a historical perspective on the tenure system in AMIs, reviews the enthusiastic debate and controversies including the concomitant advantages, disadvantages, challenges, and the underlying reasons for its decline over the last few decades, and expounds on the ramifications of such trends. This exposition also discusses alternatives and reform to the tenure system which, if implemented, would still guarantee freedom in academic medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"569-576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980933/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S508439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S508439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个多世纪以来,终身教职一直是美国学术机构的基本原则,是学术自由概念的代名词。这一概念已被外推到美国学术医疗机构(AMIs)的多个领域,包括教学和研究,作为私人公民分享意见和机构治理问题,以及为临床医生、教育工作者、科学家和学者提供安全就业的机会。然而,近几十年来,美国高等院校的终身教职制度一直在不断受到侵蚀,选民们认为,这种陈旧的结构将从改革甚至完全废除中受益。本论文提供了一个历史的角度对大学的终身教职制度,回顾了热烈的辩论和争议,包括伴随的优势,劣势,挑战,并在过去的几十年里其衰落的根本原因,并阐述了这种趋势的后果。本文还讨论了终身教职制度的替代方案和改革,如果实施终身教职制度,仍将保证医学学术自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Faculty Tenure in US Academic Medical Institutions: A Critical Review of Controversy and Debate.

For over a century, tenure has been a foundational tenet in American academic institutions, being synonymous with the concept of academic freedom. This concept has been extrapolated to US Academic Medical Institutions (AMIs) in multiple domains including teaching and research, sharing opinions as private citizens and on matters of institutional governance as well as providing clinicians, educators, scientists, and scholars opportunities for secure employment. In recent decades, however, there has been a steady erosion of the tenure system in US AMIs, and constituents suggest that this archaic construct would benefit from reform or even its complete abolition. The present treatise offers a historical perspective on the tenure system in AMIs, reviews the enthusiastic debate and controversies including the concomitant advantages, disadvantages, challenges, and the underlying reasons for its decline over the last few decades, and expounds on the ramifications of such trends. This exposition also discusses alternatives and reform to the tenure system which, if implemented, would still guarantee freedom in academic medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信