后封闭时代的异性恋者:逃避差异在管理优势身份和使不平等合法化中的作用。

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Enzo Cáceres Quezada, Bertjan Doosje, Paula Fernández Sabatés, Michael Boiger, Judit Kende
{"title":"后封闭时代的异性恋者:逃避差异在管理优势身份和使不平等合法化中的作用。","authors":"Enzo Cáceres Quezada, Bertjan Doosje, Paula Fernández Sabatés, Michael Boiger, Judit Kende","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2485145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do cisheterosexual people navigate inequality against LGBTQ people in contexts where discrimination is often considered a matter of the past? We argue that some do so by evading difference based on sexual orientation and gender identity. While emphasizing individuals and their fundamental sameness may convey an egalitarian standpoint, evading difference might obscure markers of intergroup inequality, blur the advantaged status of cisheterosexual people, and thereby legitimize structural inequality. Using mixed-methods-in-depth interviews (<i>N</i> = 20) and online surveys (<i>N</i> = 531)-we characterized distinct profiles of cisheterosexual people in the Netherlands, combining low-to-high difference evasion (\"People who focus a lot on sexual orientation and gender identity forget that we are all just people\") with low-to-high inequality evasion (\"Compared to cisgender and heterosexual people, LGBTQ people have equal opportunities\"). In turn, these profiles distinguished how cisheterosexual people manage their advantaged identity and their ideological outlook on inequality. Specifically, those evading difference were more likely to evade inequality than those acknowledging difference. Furthermore, those acknowledging difference were most likely to recognize privilege and exhibit a substantive egalitarian outlook. We conclude by discussing how cisheterosexual people can either perpetuate or challenge inequality by managing difference and the implications of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cisheterosexual People in Post-Closeted Times: The Role of Evading Difference in Managing an Advantaged Identity and Legitimizing of Inequalities.\",\"authors\":\"Enzo Cáceres Quezada, Bertjan Doosje, Paula Fernández Sabatés, Michael Boiger, Judit Kende\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2025.2485145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>How do cisheterosexual people navigate inequality against LGBTQ people in contexts where discrimination is often considered a matter of the past? We argue that some do so by evading difference based on sexual orientation and gender identity. While emphasizing individuals and their fundamental sameness may convey an egalitarian standpoint, evading difference might obscure markers of intergroup inequality, blur the advantaged status of cisheterosexual people, and thereby legitimize structural inequality. Using mixed-methods-in-depth interviews (<i>N</i> = 20) and online surveys (<i>N</i> = 531)-we characterized distinct profiles of cisheterosexual people in the Netherlands, combining low-to-high difference evasion (\\\"People who focus a lot on sexual orientation and gender identity forget that we are all just people\\\") with low-to-high inequality evasion (\\\"Compared to cisgender and heterosexual people, LGBTQ people have equal opportunities\\\"). In turn, these profiles distinguished how cisheterosexual people manage their advantaged identity and their ideological outlook on inequality. Specifically, those evading difference were more likely to evade inequality than those acknowledging difference. Furthermore, those acknowledging difference were most likely to recognize privilege and exhibit a substantive egalitarian outlook. We conclude by discussing how cisheterosexual people can either perpetuate or challenge inequality by managing difference and the implications of these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2485145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2485145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在歧视通常被视为过去的背景下,异性恋者如何应对针对LGBTQ人群的不平等?我们认为,有些人通过回避基于性取向和性别认同的差异来做到这一点。虽然强调个体及其基本的同一性可能会传达一种平等主义的立场,但回避差异可能会模糊群体间不平等的标志,模糊异性恋者的优势地位,从而使结构性不平等合法化。采用深度访谈(N = 20)和在线调查(N = 531)的混合方法,我们对荷兰的异性恋者进行了不同的描述,结合了低到高的差异逃避(“那些非常关注性取向和性别认同的人忘记了我们都只是人”)和低到高的不平等逃避(“与顺性和异性恋者相比,LGBTQ人有平等的机会”)。反过来,这些档案区分了异性恋者如何管理他们的优势身份和他们对不平等的意识形态看法。具体来说,那些回避差异的人比承认差异的人更有可能回避不平等。此外,那些承认差异的人最有可能承认特权,并表现出实质性的平等主义观点。最后,我们讨论了异性恋者如何通过管理差异来延续或挑战不平等,以及这些发现的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cisheterosexual People in Post-Closeted Times: The Role of Evading Difference in Managing an Advantaged Identity and Legitimizing of Inequalities.

How do cisheterosexual people navigate inequality against LGBTQ people in contexts where discrimination is often considered a matter of the past? We argue that some do so by evading difference based on sexual orientation and gender identity. While emphasizing individuals and their fundamental sameness may convey an egalitarian standpoint, evading difference might obscure markers of intergroup inequality, blur the advantaged status of cisheterosexual people, and thereby legitimize structural inequality. Using mixed-methods-in-depth interviews (N = 20) and online surveys (N = 531)-we characterized distinct profiles of cisheterosexual people in the Netherlands, combining low-to-high difference evasion ("People who focus a lot on sexual orientation and gender identity forget that we are all just people") with low-to-high inequality evasion ("Compared to cisgender and heterosexual people, LGBTQ people have equal opportunities"). In turn, these profiles distinguished how cisheterosexual people manage their advantaged identity and their ideological outlook on inequality. Specifically, those evading difference were more likely to evade inequality than those acknowledging difference. Furthermore, those acknowledging difference were most likely to recognize privilege and exhibit a substantive egalitarian outlook. We conclude by discussing how cisheterosexual people can either perpetuate or challenge inequality by managing difference and the implications of these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信