{"title":"植体植入截骨钻设计的热、力学和密度分析:对代表IV型骨的泡沫块的分析。","authors":"Ayşegül Öztürk, Volkan Arısan, Godoberto Guevara Rojas","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b6184384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the effects of three osteotomy drill designs (conventional, reverse helix, and densification) and running directions on heat generation, primary implant stability, block-to-implant contact, peri-implant block volume, and resistance to unscrewing forces in a low-density alveolar bone model.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Eighty-eight dental implants were placed in artificial bone blocks using manual and computer-controlled osteotomies. Temperature changes, insertion torque value, resonance frequency analyses (implant stability quotient [ISQ]), block-to-implant contact, and peri-implant block volume were measured. Statistical analyses used ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Densification drill designs produced the lowest temperature change (17.52 ± 2.57°C and 28.06 ± 4.35°C for the second and third drills), while conventional drills had the highest (27.53 ± 5.17°C and 38.03 ± 8.08°C). Counter-clockwise (CCW) conventional drilling significantly reduced the temperature change compared to clockwise (CW). Densification drill designs achieved the highest primary implant stability (38.01 ± 1.87 N/cm, 65.00 ± 4.69 ISQ) and removal torque (25.40 ± 5.08 N/cm), while conventional CW drills had the lowest (33.23 ± 2.91 N/cm, 61.83 ± 4.28 ISQ). Densification drill designs showed the highest peri-implant block volume (87.71 ± 4.23 mm3) but the lowest block-to-implant contact (49.12 ± 2.93%). CCW conventional drilling improved insertion torque value over CW (36.21 ± 3.63 vs 33.23 ± 2.91 N/cm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Densification drill designs demonstrated better performance in heat reduction, primary implant stability, and peri-implant block volume, but had lower block-to-implant contact. CCW running of conventional drills showed improvements over CW in several parameters. While densification drilling excelled in most aspects, its lower block-to-implant contact and the positive outcomes of CCW conventional drilling warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"482-499"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermal, mechanical, and densification analysis of osteotomy drill designs for implant placement: an analysis on foam blocks representing type IV bone.\",\"authors\":\"Ayşegül Öztürk, Volkan Arısan, Godoberto Guevara Rojas\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.qi.b6184384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the effects of three osteotomy drill designs (conventional, reverse helix, and densification) and running directions on heat generation, primary implant stability, block-to-implant contact, peri-implant block volume, and resistance to unscrewing forces in a low-density alveolar bone model.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Eighty-eight dental implants were placed in artificial bone blocks using manual and computer-controlled osteotomies. Temperature changes, insertion torque value, resonance frequency analyses (implant stability quotient [ISQ]), block-to-implant contact, and peri-implant block volume were measured. Statistical analyses used ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Densification drill designs produced the lowest temperature change (17.52 ± 2.57°C and 28.06 ± 4.35°C for the second and third drills), while conventional drills had the highest (27.53 ± 5.17°C and 38.03 ± 8.08°C). Counter-clockwise (CCW) conventional drilling significantly reduced the temperature change compared to clockwise (CW). Densification drill designs achieved the highest primary implant stability (38.01 ± 1.87 N/cm, 65.00 ± 4.69 ISQ) and removal torque (25.40 ± 5.08 N/cm), while conventional CW drills had the lowest (33.23 ± 2.91 N/cm, 61.83 ± 4.28 ISQ). Densification drill designs showed the highest peri-implant block volume (87.71 ± 4.23 mm3) but the lowest block-to-implant contact (49.12 ± 2.93%). CCW conventional drilling improved insertion torque value over CW (36.21 ± 3.63 vs 33.23 ± 2.91 N/cm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Densification drill designs demonstrated better performance in heat reduction, primary implant stability, and peri-implant block volume, but had lower block-to-implant contact. CCW running of conventional drills showed improvements over CW in several parameters. While densification drilling excelled in most aspects, its lower block-to-implant contact and the positive outcomes of CCW conventional drilling warrant further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quintessence international\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"482-499\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quintessence international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6184384\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6184384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:分析常规[CON]、反螺旋[REX]和致密化[DEN]三种截骨钻头设计及运行方向对低密度牙槽骨模型产热、初级种植体稳定性(PS)、块体与种植体接触(BIC)%、种植体周围块体体积(BV)和抗旋脱力的影响。方法与材料:采用人工截骨术和电脑截骨术将88颗种植体植入人工骨块中。测量温度变化(Δ°C)、插入扭矩值(ITV)、共振频率分析(ISQ)、BIC%和BV。统计分析采用方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验(结果:DEN钻孔产生的最低Δ°C(第2次和第3次钻孔分别为17.52±2.57°C和28.06±4.35°C), CON最高(27.53±5.17°C和38.03±8.08°C)。与顺时针钻井(CW)相比,逆时针钻井(CCW)可显著降低Δ°C。DEN的最大扭矩(38.01±1.87 N/cm, 65±4.69 ISQ)和最大扭矩(25.4±5.08 N/cm), CON CW的最小扭矩(33.23±2.91 N/cm, 61.83±4.28 ISQ)。DEN的BV最高(87.71±4.23 mm³),BIC最低(49.12%±2.93%)。与CW相比,CCW CON钻井提高了ITV(36.21±3.63 N/cm vs 33.23±2.91 N/cm)。结论:DEN钻孔在热还原、PS和BV方面具有较好的性能,但BIC%较低。CON钻头的CCW下入在几个参数上都优于CW。虽然DEN在大多数方面都表现出色,但其较低的BIC%和CCW CON钻井的积极成果值得进一步研究。
Thermal, mechanical, and densification analysis of osteotomy drill designs for implant placement: an analysis on foam blocks representing type IV bone.
Objectives: To analyze the effects of three osteotomy drill designs (conventional, reverse helix, and densification) and running directions on heat generation, primary implant stability, block-to-implant contact, peri-implant block volume, and resistance to unscrewing forces in a low-density alveolar bone model.
Method and materials: Eighty-eight dental implants were placed in artificial bone blocks using manual and computer-controlled osteotomies. Temperature changes, insertion torque value, resonance frequency analyses (implant stability quotient [ISQ]), block-to-implant contact, and peri-implant block volume were measured. Statistical analyses used ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (P < .05).
Results: Densification drill designs produced the lowest temperature change (17.52 ± 2.57°C and 28.06 ± 4.35°C for the second and third drills), while conventional drills had the highest (27.53 ± 5.17°C and 38.03 ± 8.08°C). Counter-clockwise (CCW) conventional drilling significantly reduced the temperature change compared to clockwise (CW). Densification drill designs achieved the highest primary implant stability (38.01 ± 1.87 N/cm, 65.00 ± 4.69 ISQ) and removal torque (25.40 ± 5.08 N/cm), while conventional CW drills had the lowest (33.23 ± 2.91 N/cm, 61.83 ± 4.28 ISQ). Densification drill designs showed the highest peri-implant block volume (87.71 ± 4.23 mm3) but the lowest block-to-implant contact (49.12 ± 2.93%). CCW conventional drilling improved insertion torque value over CW (36.21 ± 3.63 vs 33.23 ± 2.91 N/cm).
Conclusion: Densification drill designs demonstrated better performance in heat reduction, primary implant stability, and peri-implant block volume, but had lower block-to-implant contact. CCW running of conventional drills showed improvements over CW in several parameters. While densification drilling excelled in most aspects, its lower block-to-implant contact and the positive outcomes of CCW conventional drilling warrant further investigation.
期刊介绍:
QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.