胸膜厚度对ct引导胸膜穿刺活检诊断不明原因渗出性胸腔积液敏感性的影响。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Rui Xu, Ling Zuo, Chiyong Yang, Li Jiang, Ying Liu, Ping Fan, Kaige Wang, Dan Liu
{"title":"胸膜厚度对ct引导胸膜穿刺活检诊断不明原因渗出性胸腔积液敏感性的影响。","authors":"Rui Xu, Ling Zuo, Chiyong Yang, Li Jiang, Ying Liu, Ping Fan, Kaige Wang, Dan Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12931-025-03229-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In most cases, patients with pleural effusion require a pleural biopsy to confirm the diagnosis, due to the low diagnostic sensitivity of thoracentesis. Among the different biopsy modalities, real time computed tomography scan-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy (CT-CNPB) ensures high sensitivity and accessibility. However, there is no study investigating the difference in the diagnostic sensitivity of CT-CNPB for lesions with variable pleural thickness in effusions of different types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of the 303 patients who underwent CT-CNPB, 218 met the eligibility criteria and were retrospectively analyzed from November 2021 to June 2024. Patients were divided into malignant pleural effusion (MPE), tuberculosis pleural effusion (TPE), and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion (BPE) groups according to the diagnosis with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Pleural thickness was defined as the length of the portion of the puncture needle that passes through the thickened parietal pleura or the pleural lesion (nodule/mass). In further analysis, we compare the differences in sensitivity between subgroups with different pleural thicknesses in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall diagnostic sensitivity is 74.3%. The sensitivity in MPE, TPE, and BPE is 75.7%, 78.6%, and 67.8%, respectively. There was a significant difference in sensitivity between the < 5 mm and ≥ 5 mm groups in MPE and BPE groups but was not observed in the TPE group. In the further analysis, there was a significant difference in sensitivity between < 3 mm and 3-5 mm groups in TPE (p = 0.046) and a significant difference in sensitivity between 3 and 5 mm and 5-10 mm groups in MPE (p = 0.017), but a significant difference was not observed in BPE group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT-CNPB may serve as a preferred diagnostic approach in suspected TPE with pleural thickening ≥ 3 mm and suspected MPE with thickening ≥ 5 mm on chest CT. Where MT is unavailable, CT-CNPB is a viable alternative for suspected MPE or TPE patients with pleural thickening, nodularity, or mass lesions observed on CT. However, in suspected BPE, CT-CNPB alone is often insufficient; integrated clinical, laboratory, and imaging evaluation remains essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":49131,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"153"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of pleural thickness on the sensitivity of computed tomography scan-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy in diagnosing unexplained exudative pleural effusion.\",\"authors\":\"Rui Xu, Ling Zuo, Chiyong Yang, Li Jiang, Ying Liu, Ping Fan, Kaige Wang, Dan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12931-025-03229-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In most cases, patients with pleural effusion require a pleural biopsy to confirm the diagnosis, due to the low diagnostic sensitivity of thoracentesis. Among the different biopsy modalities, real time computed tomography scan-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy (CT-CNPB) ensures high sensitivity and accessibility. However, there is no study investigating the difference in the diagnostic sensitivity of CT-CNPB for lesions with variable pleural thickness in effusions of different types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of the 303 patients who underwent CT-CNPB, 218 met the eligibility criteria and were retrospectively analyzed from November 2021 to June 2024. Patients were divided into malignant pleural effusion (MPE), tuberculosis pleural effusion (TPE), and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion (BPE) groups according to the diagnosis with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Pleural thickness was defined as the length of the portion of the puncture needle that passes through the thickened parietal pleura or the pleural lesion (nodule/mass). In further analysis, we compare the differences in sensitivity between subgroups with different pleural thicknesses in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall diagnostic sensitivity is 74.3%. The sensitivity in MPE, TPE, and BPE is 75.7%, 78.6%, and 67.8%, respectively. There was a significant difference in sensitivity between the < 5 mm and ≥ 5 mm groups in MPE and BPE groups but was not observed in the TPE group. In the further analysis, there was a significant difference in sensitivity between < 3 mm and 3-5 mm groups in TPE (p = 0.046) and a significant difference in sensitivity between 3 and 5 mm and 5-10 mm groups in MPE (p = 0.017), but a significant difference was not observed in BPE group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT-CNPB may serve as a preferred diagnostic approach in suspected TPE with pleural thickening ≥ 3 mm and suspected MPE with thickening ≥ 5 mm on chest CT. Where MT is unavailable, CT-CNPB is a viable alternative for suspected MPE or TPE patients with pleural thickening, nodularity, or mass lesions observed on CT. However, in suspected BPE, CT-CNPB alone is often insufficient; integrated clinical, laboratory, and imaging evaluation remains essential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008875/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03229-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-025-03229-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在大多数病例中,由于胸腔穿刺的诊断敏感性较低,胸腔积液患者需要胸膜活检来确诊。在不同的活检方式中,实时计算机断层扫描引导下的胸膜穿刺活检(CT-CNPB)具有较高的灵敏度和可及性。然而,目前还没有研究探讨CT-CNPB对不同类型积液中不同胸膜厚度病变的诊断敏感性差异。方法:在303例接受CT-CNPB的患者中,218例符合资格标准,回顾性分析2021年11月至2024年6月。根据诊断将患者分为恶性胸腔积液(MPE)组、结核性胸腔积液(TPE)组和非结核性良性胸腔积液(BPE)组,最低随访时间为6个月。胸膜厚度定义为穿刺针穿过增厚的胸膜壁层或胸膜病变(结节/肿块)部分的长度。在进一步的分析中,我们比较了各组不同胸膜厚度亚组之间的敏感性差异。结果:总诊断敏感性为74.3%。MPE、TPE和BPE的敏感性分别为75.7%、78.6%和67.8%。结论:CT- cnpb可作为胸膜增厚≥3mm的疑似TPE和胸膜增厚≥5mm的疑似MPE的首选诊断方法。对于CT上有胸膜增厚、结节性或团块病变的疑似MPE或TPE患者,CT- cnpb是可行的替代方法。然而,对于疑似BPE,仅CT-CNPB往往是不够的;综合临床、实验室和影像学评估仍然是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of pleural thickness on the sensitivity of computed tomography scan-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy in diagnosing unexplained exudative pleural effusion.

Background: In most cases, patients with pleural effusion require a pleural biopsy to confirm the diagnosis, due to the low diagnostic sensitivity of thoracentesis. Among the different biopsy modalities, real time computed tomography scan-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy (CT-CNPB) ensures high sensitivity and accessibility. However, there is no study investigating the difference in the diagnostic sensitivity of CT-CNPB for lesions with variable pleural thickness in effusions of different types.

Methods: Of the 303 patients who underwent CT-CNPB, 218 met the eligibility criteria and were retrospectively analyzed from November 2021 to June 2024. Patients were divided into malignant pleural effusion (MPE), tuberculosis pleural effusion (TPE), and non-tuberculous benign pleural effusion (BPE) groups according to the diagnosis with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Pleural thickness was defined as the length of the portion of the puncture needle that passes through the thickened parietal pleura or the pleural lesion (nodule/mass). In further analysis, we compare the differences in sensitivity between subgroups with different pleural thicknesses in each group.

Results: The overall diagnostic sensitivity is 74.3%. The sensitivity in MPE, TPE, and BPE is 75.7%, 78.6%, and 67.8%, respectively. There was a significant difference in sensitivity between the < 5 mm and ≥ 5 mm groups in MPE and BPE groups but was not observed in the TPE group. In the further analysis, there was a significant difference in sensitivity between < 3 mm and 3-5 mm groups in TPE (p = 0.046) and a significant difference in sensitivity between 3 and 5 mm and 5-10 mm groups in MPE (p = 0.017), but a significant difference was not observed in BPE group.

Conclusion: CT-CNPB may serve as a preferred diagnostic approach in suspected TPE with pleural thickening ≥ 3 mm and suspected MPE with thickening ≥ 5 mm on chest CT. Where MT is unavailable, CT-CNPB is a viable alternative for suspected MPE or TPE patients with pleural thickening, nodularity, or mass lesions observed on CT. However, in suspected BPE, CT-CNPB alone is often insufficient; integrated clinical, laboratory, and imaging evaluation remains essential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory Research
Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
1.70%
发文量
314
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Respiratory Research publishes high-quality clinical and basic research, review and commentary articles on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related diseases. As the leading fully open access journal in the field, Respiratory Research provides an essential resource for pulmonologists, allergists, immunologists and other physicians, researchers, healthcare workers and medical students with worldwide dissemination of articles resulting in high visibility and generating international discussion. Topics of specific interest include asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, genetics, infectious diseases, interstitial lung diseases, lung development, lung tumors, occupational and environmental factors, pulmonary circulation, pulmonary pharmacology and therapeutics, respiratory immunology, respiratory physiology, and sleep-related respiratory problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信