用户参与的人种学:导航一个模糊的研究位置。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Malene Lue Kessing, Sine Kirkegaard
{"title":"用户参与的人种学:导航一个模糊的研究位置。","authors":"Malene Lue Kessing, Sine Kirkegaard","doi":"10.1177/10497323251328538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores the methodological dilemmas that arise when conducting ethnography of user involvement in mental healthcare settings. Public health systems commonly integrate the experiences and insights of service users to enhance service quality and \"empower\" participants. In health research, there is a growing interest in coproducing research with participants, leading to an expanding body of literature on collaborative research methodologies. However, little attention has been given to how the concept of user involvement changes standards and expectations for how we conduct ethnographic research. Drawing on two Danish studies on user involvement initiatives, we demonstrate how the increased political and organizational focus on user involvement both encourages and contests a blurred research position that cuts across well-established participant categories such as \"service user\" and \"service provider.\" This blurred position intensifies dilemmas related to the researcher's positionality, personal biography, emotional reflexivity, and representation of knowledge. By critically engaging with our fieldwork experiences, we identify methodological dilemmas that may inspire researchers in the field of qualitative health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251328538"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnography of User Involvement: Navigating a Blurred Research Position.\",\"authors\":\"Malene Lue Kessing, Sine Kirkegaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10497323251328538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article explores the methodological dilemmas that arise when conducting ethnography of user involvement in mental healthcare settings. Public health systems commonly integrate the experiences and insights of service users to enhance service quality and \\\"empower\\\" participants. In health research, there is a growing interest in coproducing research with participants, leading to an expanding body of literature on collaborative research methodologies. However, little attention has been given to how the concept of user involvement changes standards and expectations for how we conduct ethnographic research. Drawing on two Danish studies on user involvement initiatives, we demonstrate how the increased political and organizational focus on user involvement both encourages and contests a blurred research position that cuts across well-established participant categories such as \\\"service user\\\" and \\\"service provider.\\\" This blurred position intensifies dilemmas related to the researcher's positionality, personal biography, emotional reflexivity, and representation of knowledge. By critically engaging with our fieldwork experiences, we identify methodological dilemmas that may inspire researchers in the field of qualitative health research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Health Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10497323251328538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251328538\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251328538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了在精神卫生保健环境中进行用户参与的人种志时出现的方法论困境。公共卫生系统通常整合服务用户的经验和见解,以提高服务质量并“赋予”参与者权力。在卫生研究方面,人们对与参与者共同进行研究的兴趣越来越大,导致有关合作研究方法的文献越来越多。然而,很少有人关注用户参与的概念如何改变我们如何进行民族志研究的标准和期望。根据丹麦两项关于用户参与倡议的研究,我们展示了对用户参与的政治和组织关注的增加如何鼓励和挑战一个模糊的研究立场,该研究立场跨越了“服务用户”和“服务提供者”等既定的参与者类别。这种模糊的立场加剧了与研究者的立场、个人传记、情感反射和知识表现有关的困境。通过批判性地参与我们的实地工作经验,我们确定了可能激励定性健康研究领域的研究人员的方法论困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethnography of User Involvement: Navigating a Blurred Research Position.

This article explores the methodological dilemmas that arise when conducting ethnography of user involvement in mental healthcare settings. Public health systems commonly integrate the experiences and insights of service users to enhance service quality and "empower" participants. In health research, there is a growing interest in coproducing research with participants, leading to an expanding body of literature on collaborative research methodologies. However, little attention has been given to how the concept of user involvement changes standards and expectations for how we conduct ethnographic research. Drawing on two Danish studies on user involvement initiatives, we demonstrate how the increased political and organizational focus on user involvement both encourages and contests a blurred research position that cuts across well-established participant categories such as "service user" and "service provider." This blurred position intensifies dilemmas related to the researcher's positionality, personal biography, emotional reflexivity, and representation of knowledge. By critically engaging with our fieldwork experiences, we identify methodological dilemmas that may inspire researchers in the field of qualitative health research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信