Sebastian Johannes Müller, Eya Khadhraoui, Roland Schwab, Elie Diamandis, Daniel Behme
{"title":"轮廓神经血管系统治疗颅内动脉瘤的系统综述。","authors":"Sebastian Johannes Müller, Eya Khadhraoui, Roland Schwab, Elie Diamandis, Daniel Behme","doi":"10.1177/19714009251336321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThis systematic review aims to reflect the current state of the literature on use and efficacy of the Contour Neurovascular System (CNS), an endovascular implant specifically developed for the treatment of intracranial wide-neck aneurysms.MethodsWe included manuscripts from a PubMed search with the terms \"contour AND aneurysm.\" Manuscripts that did not refer to the CNS were excluded via screening.The number of interventions from included studies was calculated and, where possible, occlusion rates of aneurysms, used CNS sizes, and complications were recorded.ResultsWe found a total number of 23 studies with 625 patients and 661 aneurysms treated with CNS (122 ruptured). The number of studies with low bias and sufficient randomization is very small. Only two prospective studies with 43 patients could be identified. The mean aneurysm size was 6.4 mm (height), 5.5 mm (dome size), and 3.9 mm (neck size). Most used CNS sizes were \"7\" and \"9.\" A complete occlusion result was achieved in 61% of patients in the long-term controls; in 28%, an adequate occlusion with a small neck rest was reported.ConclusionsThe preliminary results of the CNS are promising. However, these findings need to be proven in larger, prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009251336321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the Contour Neurovascular System for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Johannes Müller, Eya Khadhraoui, Roland Schwab, Elie Diamandis, Daniel Behme\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19714009251336321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThis systematic review aims to reflect the current state of the literature on use and efficacy of the Contour Neurovascular System (CNS), an endovascular implant specifically developed for the treatment of intracranial wide-neck aneurysms.MethodsWe included manuscripts from a PubMed search with the terms \\\"contour AND aneurysm.\\\" Manuscripts that did not refer to the CNS were excluded via screening.The number of interventions from included studies was calculated and, where possible, occlusion rates of aneurysms, used CNS sizes, and complications were recorded.ResultsWe found a total number of 23 studies with 625 patients and 661 aneurysms treated with CNS (122 ruptured). The number of studies with low bias and sufficient randomization is very small. Only two prospective studies with 43 patients could be identified. The mean aneurysm size was 6.4 mm (height), 5.5 mm (dome size), and 3.9 mm (neck size). Most used CNS sizes were \\\"7\\\" and \\\"9.\\\" A complete occlusion result was achieved in 61% of patients in the long-term controls; in 28%, an adequate occlusion with a small neck rest was reported.ConclusionsThe preliminary results of the CNS are promising. However, these findings need to be proven in larger, prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19714009251336321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014585/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251336321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251336321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic review of the Contour Neurovascular System for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.
BackgroundThis systematic review aims to reflect the current state of the literature on use and efficacy of the Contour Neurovascular System (CNS), an endovascular implant specifically developed for the treatment of intracranial wide-neck aneurysms.MethodsWe included manuscripts from a PubMed search with the terms "contour AND aneurysm." Manuscripts that did not refer to the CNS were excluded via screening.The number of interventions from included studies was calculated and, where possible, occlusion rates of aneurysms, used CNS sizes, and complications were recorded.ResultsWe found a total number of 23 studies with 625 patients and 661 aneurysms treated with CNS (122 ruptured). The number of studies with low bias and sufficient randomization is very small. Only two prospective studies with 43 patients could be identified. The mean aneurysm size was 6.4 mm (height), 5.5 mm (dome size), and 3.9 mm (neck size). Most used CNS sizes were "7" and "9." A complete occlusion result was achieved in 61% of patients in the long-term controls; in 28%, an adequate occlusion with a small neck rest was reported.ConclusionsThe preliminary results of the CNS are promising. However, these findings need to be proven in larger, prospective studies.
期刊介绍:
NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.