COPD-PH和ILD-PH的血流动力学和运动后恢复反应:评估。

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung India Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_213_24
Sayoni Sengupta, Parthasarathi Bhattacharyya, Aniruddha De, Sayanti Karmakar, Wrick Chakraborty, Dipanjan Saha
{"title":"COPD-PH和ILD-PH的血流动力学和运动后恢复反应:评估。","authors":"Sayoni Sengupta, Parthasarathi Bhattacharyya, Aniruddha De, Sayanti Karmakar, Wrick Chakraborty, Dipanjan Saha","doi":"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_213_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic lung disease (CLD) from either airway obstruction or parenchymal affections can lead to secondary pulmonary hypertension. It may be interesting to compare the two types of CLD-PH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects of CLD were first evaluated for the primary category of disease with chest X-ray, HRCT chest, spirometry, and DLCO (diffusion capacity) and then for the presence of PH through exercise of the institutional clinic-radio-echocardiographic algorithm. Those qualifying as either unmixed restrictive (ILD) or COPD (chronic obstructive airway disease) with PH underwent two-chair test for assessment of post-exercise recovery response. The two groups were compared on available parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients with COPD-PH were significantly older with similar FVC and DLCO compared to ILD-PH. In two-chair test, the maximum pulse rate and the desat-max were significantly worse (108.68 ± 1 5.46 vs 101.33 ± 12.62, P = 0.002, and - 5.68 ± 4.78 vs - 3.71 ± 2.73, P = 0.006) for the ILD-PH patients. The ILD-PH sufferers also demonstrated a lower TAPSE (21.16 ± 3.11 vs 22.59 ± 2.71; P-0.001) and a higher calculated mean pulmonary artery pressure (32.00 ± 7.54 vs 30.64 ± 4.22 vs, P = 0.05) compared to the subjects with COPD-PH. The other right ventricular systolic functional parameters [systolic excursion velocity (S-prime), right ventricular free wall global longitudinal strain, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity] supported the trend.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ILD-PH patients show relatively higher PH with lower right ventricular systolic function than COPD-PH.</p>","PeriodicalId":47462,"journal":{"name":"Lung India","volume":"42 3","pages":"225-230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Haemodynamics and post-exercise recovery response in COPD-PH and ILD-PH: An appraisal.\",\"authors\":\"Sayoni Sengupta, Parthasarathi Bhattacharyya, Aniruddha De, Sayanti Karmakar, Wrick Chakraborty, Dipanjan Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_213_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic lung disease (CLD) from either airway obstruction or parenchymal affections can lead to secondary pulmonary hypertension. It may be interesting to compare the two types of CLD-PH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects of CLD were first evaluated for the primary category of disease with chest X-ray, HRCT chest, spirometry, and DLCO (diffusion capacity) and then for the presence of PH through exercise of the institutional clinic-radio-echocardiographic algorithm. Those qualifying as either unmixed restrictive (ILD) or COPD (chronic obstructive airway disease) with PH underwent two-chair test for assessment of post-exercise recovery response. The two groups were compared on available parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients with COPD-PH were significantly older with similar FVC and DLCO compared to ILD-PH. In two-chair test, the maximum pulse rate and the desat-max were significantly worse (108.68 ± 1 5.46 vs 101.33 ± 12.62, P = 0.002, and - 5.68 ± 4.78 vs - 3.71 ± 2.73, P = 0.006) for the ILD-PH patients. The ILD-PH sufferers also demonstrated a lower TAPSE (21.16 ± 3.11 vs 22.59 ± 2.71; P-0.001) and a higher calculated mean pulmonary artery pressure (32.00 ± 7.54 vs 30.64 ± 4.22 vs, P = 0.05) compared to the subjects with COPD-PH. The other right ventricular systolic functional parameters [systolic excursion velocity (S-prime), right ventricular free wall global longitudinal strain, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity] supported the trend.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ILD-PH patients show relatively higher PH with lower right ventricular systolic function than COPD-PH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung India\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"225-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_213_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_213_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由气道阻塞或实质病变引起的慢性肺部疾病(CLD)可导致继发性肺动脉高压。比较两种类型的CLD-PH可能会很有趣。方法:首先通过胸部x线、HRCT胸部、肺活量测定和DLCO(扩散能力)评估CLD患者的主要疾病类型,然后通过临床-超声心动图算法评估PH的存在。患有非混合性限制性(ILD)或慢性阻塞性气道疾病(COPD)的患者接受双椅试验,以评估运动后恢复反应。比较两组可用参数。结果:COPD-PH患者年龄明显大于ILD-PH患者,FVC和DLCO相似。在双椅试验中,ILD-PH患者的最大脉搏率和最大脉搏值(desat-max)明显差(108.68±1.546 vs 101.33±12.62,P = 0.002, - 5.68±4.78 vs - 3.71±2.73,P = 0.006)。ILD-PH患者也表现出较低的TAPSE(21.16±3.11 vs 22.59±2.71;P = 0.001),与COPD-PH患者相比,计算的平均肺动脉压更高(32.00±7.54 vs 30.64±4.22 vs, P = 0.05)。其他右心室收缩功能参数[收缩偏移速度(S-prime),右心室自由壁整体纵向应变,收缩期肺动脉压,三尖瓣反流射流速度]支持这一趋势。结论:与COPD-PH相比,ILD-PH患者PH值较高,右心室收缩功能较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Haemodynamics and post-exercise recovery response in COPD-PH and ILD-PH: An appraisal.

Background: Chronic lung disease (CLD) from either airway obstruction or parenchymal affections can lead to secondary pulmonary hypertension. It may be interesting to compare the two types of CLD-PH.

Methods: Subjects of CLD were first evaluated for the primary category of disease with chest X-ray, HRCT chest, spirometry, and DLCO (diffusion capacity) and then for the presence of PH through exercise of the institutional clinic-radio-echocardiographic algorithm. Those qualifying as either unmixed restrictive (ILD) or COPD (chronic obstructive airway disease) with PH underwent two-chair test for assessment of post-exercise recovery response. The two groups were compared on available parameters.

Results: The patients with COPD-PH were significantly older with similar FVC and DLCO compared to ILD-PH. In two-chair test, the maximum pulse rate and the desat-max were significantly worse (108.68 ± 1 5.46 vs 101.33 ± 12.62, P = 0.002, and - 5.68 ± 4.78 vs - 3.71 ± 2.73, P = 0.006) for the ILD-PH patients. The ILD-PH sufferers also demonstrated a lower TAPSE (21.16 ± 3.11 vs 22.59 ± 2.71; P-0.001) and a higher calculated mean pulmonary artery pressure (32.00 ± 7.54 vs 30.64 ± 4.22 vs, P = 0.05) compared to the subjects with COPD-PH. The other right ventricular systolic functional parameters [systolic excursion velocity (S-prime), right ventricular free wall global longitudinal strain, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity] supported the trend.

Conclusion: The ILD-PH patients show relatively higher PH with lower right ventricular systolic function than COPD-PH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lung India
Lung India RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信