基于人工智能的深度学习算法检测毛玻璃不透明结节:综述。

Narra J Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.52225/narra.v5i1.1361
Henil P Shah, Agha Sah Naqvi, Parth Rajput, Hanan Ambra, Harrini Venkatesh, Junaid Saleem, Sudarshan Saravanan, Mayur Wanjari, Gaurav Mittal
{"title":"基于人工智能的深度学习算法检测毛玻璃不透明结节:综述。","authors":"Henil P Shah, Agha Sah Naqvi, Parth Rajput, Hanan Ambra, Harrini Venkatesh, Junaid Saleem, Sudarshan Saravanan, Mayur Wanjari, Gaurav Mittal","doi":"10.52225/narra.v5i1.1361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) are hazy opacities on chest computed tomography (CT) scans that can indicate various lung diseases, including early COVID-19, pneumonia, and lung cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising tool for analyzing medical images, such as chest CT scans. The aim of this study was to evaluate AI models' performance in detecting GGO nodules using metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC) and precision. We designed a search strategy to include reports focusing on deep learning algorithms applied to high-resolution CT scans. The search was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ScienceDirect to identify studies published between 2016 and 2024. Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool, assessing the risk of bias and applicability concerns across four domains. Two reviewers independently screened studies reporting the diagnostic ability of AI-assisted CT scans in early GGO detection, where the review results were synthesized qualitatively. Out of 5,247 initially identified records, we found 18 studies matching the inclusion criteria of this study. Among evaluated models, DenseNet achieved the highest accuracy of 99.48%, though its sensitivity and specificity were not reported. WOANet showed an accuracy of 98.78%, with a sensitivity of 98.37% and high specificity of 99.19%, excelling particularly in specificity without compromising sensitivity. In conclusion, AI models can potentially detect GGO on chest CT scans. Future research should focus on developing hybrid models that integrate various AI approaches to improve clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":517416,"journal":{"name":"Narra J","volume":"5 1","pages":"e1361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-based deep learning algorithms for ground-glass opacity nodule detection: A review.\",\"authors\":\"Henil P Shah, Agha Sah Naqvi, Parth Rajput, Hanan Ambra, Harrini Venkatesh, Junaid Saleem, Sudarshan Saravanan, Mayur Wanjari, Gaurav Mittal\",\"doi\":\"10.52225/narra.v5i1.1361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) are hazy opacities on chest computed tomography (CT) scans that can indicate various lung diseases, including early COVID-19, pneumonia, and lung cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising tool for analyzing medical images, such as chest CT scans. The aim of this study was to evaluate AI models' performance in detecting GGO nodules using metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC) and precision. We designed a search strategy to include reports focusing on deep learning algorithms applied to high-resolution CT scans. The search was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ScienceDirect to identify studies published between 2016 and 2024. Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool, assessing the risk of bias and applicability concerns across four domains. Two reviewers independently screened studies reporting the diagnostic ability of AI-assisted CT scans in early GGO detection, where the review results were synthesized qualitatively. Out of 5,247 initially identified records, we found 18 studies matching the inclusion criteria of this study. Among evaluated models, DenseNet achieved the highest accuracy of 99.48%, though its sensitivity and specificity were not reported. WOANet showed an accuracy of 98.78%, with a sensitivity of 98.37% and high specificity of 99.19%, excelling particularly in specificity without compromising sensitivity. In conclusion, AI models can potentially detect GGO on chest CT scans. Future research should focus on developing hybrid models that integrate various AI approaches to improve clinical applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":517416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Narra J\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"e1361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059966/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Narra J\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v5i1.1361\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narra J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v5i1.1361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

毛玻璃混浊(GGOs)是胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)上的朦胧混浊,可以提示各种肺部疾病,包括早期COVID-19、肺炎和肺癌。人工智能(AI)是一种很有前途的医学图像分析工具,比如胸部CT扫描。本研究的目的是通过准确性、敏感性、特异性、F1评分、曲线下面积(AUC)和精度等指标来评估人工智能模型在检测GGO结节方面的性能。我们设计了一个搜索策略,包括专注于应用于高分辨率CT扫描的深度学习算法的报告。检索在PubMed、b谷歌Scholar、Scopus和ScienceDirect上进行,以确定2016年至2024年之间发表的研究。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2 (QUADAS-2)工具对纳入的研究进行质量评估,评估四个领域的偏倚风险和适用性问题。两位审稿人独立筛选了报告人工智能辅助CT扫描在早期GGO检测中的诊断能力的研究,并对审评结果进行了定性综合。在最初确定的5247份记录中,我们发现18项研究符合本研究的纳入标准。在评估的模型中,DenseNet的准确率最高,为99.48%,但其敏感性和特异性未见报道。WOANet的准确率为98.78%,灵敏度为98.37%,特异性为99.19%,在不影响灵敏度的情况下,特异性尤为突出。总之,人工智能模型可以在胸部CT扫描中检测到GGO。未来的研究应侧重于开发综合各种人工智能方法的混合模型,以提高临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Artificial intelligence-based deep learning algorithms for ground-glass opacity nodule detection: A review.

Artificial intelligence-based deep learning algorithms for ground-glass opacity nodule detection: A review.

Artificial intelligence-based deep learning algorithms for ground-glass opacity nodule detection: A review.

Artificial intelligence-based deep learning algorithms for ground-glass opacity nodule detection: A review.

Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) are hazy opacities on chest computed tomography (CT) scans that can indicate various lung diseases, including early COVID-19, pneumonia, and lung cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising tool for analyzing medical images, such as chest CT scans. The aim of this study was to evaluate AI models' performance in detecting GGO nodules using metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC) and precision. We designed a search strategy to include reports focusing on deep learning algorithms applied to high-resolution CT scans. The search was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ScienceDirect to identify studies published between 2016 and 2024. Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool, assessing the risk of bias and applicability concerns across four domains. Two reviewers independently screened studies reporting the diagnostic ability of AI-assisted CT scans in early GGO detection, where the review results were synthesized qualitatively. Out of 5,247 initially identified records, we found 18 studies matching the inclusion criteria of this study. Among evaluated models, DenseNet achieved the highest accuracy of 99.48%, though its sensitivity and specificity were not reported. WOANet showed an accuracy of 98.78%, with a sensitivity of 98.37% and high specificity of 99.19%, excelling particularly in specificity without compromising sensitivity. In conclusion, AI models can potentially detect GGO on chest CT scans. Future research should focus on developing hybrid models that integrate various AI approaches to improve clinical applicability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信