Amal Ben Dhia, Maria-Pia Bucci, Chokri Naffeti, Helmi Ben Saad, Omar Hammouda, Tarak Driss
{"title":"认知和运动联合训练提高阅读障碍儿童的阅读、写作和运动协调能力。","authors":"Amal Ben Dhia, Maria-Pia Bucci, Chokri Naffeti, Helmi Ben Saad, Omar Hammouda, Tarak Driss","doi":"10.3390/pediatric17020046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Different strategies were proposed to enhance dyslexic children's performance. This study aimed to investigate the effect of combined cognitive and motor training on reading, writing, and motor coordination in dyslexic children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four children with dyslexia (9.33 ± 0.48 years) were randomly allocated to either a Control (CG, 9.25 ± 0.45 years, n = 12) or a Trained Group (TG, 9.42 ± 0.51 years, n = 12). The intervention lasted eight weeks with a pre/post measurement (Δ) design in each group. It consisted of a combined cognitive and motor program composed of two 45 min sessions per week in TG. Reading and writing capabilities were measured using the word reading task based on the French battery (BALE) and the word dictation task, inspired by the ODÉDYS-2 French battery, respectively. The visuospatial orientation and the upper limb coordination parameters were evaluated using the Judgment of Line Orientation Test and Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency, second edition, short form test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures showed no significant difference between CG and TG in pre-intervention in all tests. Reading (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 1.19, Δ% = 15.07) and writing (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 1.13, Δ% = 19.69) scores increased significantly at post-compared to preintervention in the TG group. Comparable results were obtained in the visuospatial orientation (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 0.97, Δ% = 63.50) and the upper limb coordination (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 0.69, Δ% = 110.42) scores. No significant change was observed in CG comparing pre/post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A combined cognitive and motor training program could allow better cerebellar integration, leading to the improvement in reading, writing, and motor abilities in children with dyslexia. Further studies on a larger number of dyslexic children will be necessary to explore such issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":45251,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Reports","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12030611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined Cognitive and Motor Training Improves Reading, Writing and Motor Coordination in Dyslexic Children.\",\"authors\":\"Amal Ben Dhia, Maria-Pia Bucci, Chokri Naffeti, Helmi Ben Saad, Omar Hammouda, Tarak Driss\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pediatric17020046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Different strategies were proposed to enhance dyslexic children's performance. This study aimed to investigate the effect of combined cognitive and motor training on reading, writing, and motor coordination in dyslexic children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four children with dyslexia (9.33 ± 0.48 years) were randomly allocated to either a Control (CG, 9.25 ± 0.45 years, n = 12) or a Trained Group (TG, 9.42 ± 0.51 years, n = 12). The intervention lasted eight weeks with a pre/post measurement (Δ) design in each group. It consisted of a combined cognitive and motor program composed of two 45 min sessions per week in TG. Reading and writing capabilities were measured using the word reading task based on the French battery (BALE) and the word dictation task, inspired by the ODÉDYS-2 French battery, respectively. The visuospatial orientation and the upper limb coordination parameters were evaluated using the Judgment of Line Orientation Test and Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency, second edition, short form test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures showed no significant difference between CG and TG in pre-intervention in all tests. Reading (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 1.19, Δ% = 15.07) and writing (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 1.13, Δ% = 19.69) scores increased significantly at post-compared to preintervention in the TG group. Comparable results were obtained in the visuospatial orientation (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 0.97, Δ% = 63.50) and the upper limb coordination (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 0.69, Δ% = 110.42) scores. No significant change was observed in CG comparing pre/post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A combined cognitive and motor training program could allow better cerebellar integration, leading to the improvement in reading, writing, and motor abilities in children with dyslexia. Further studies on a larger number of dyslexic children will be necessary to explore such issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Reports\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12030611/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric17020046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric17020046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:提出了不同的策略来提高阅读困难儿童的表现。本研究旨在探讨认知与运动联合训练对失读症儿童阅读、写作和运动协调能力的影响。方法:24例阅读障碍儿童(9.33±0.48岁)随机分为对照组(CG, 9.25±0.45岁,n = 12)和训练组(TG, 9.42±0.51岁,n = 12)。干预持续8周,每组采用前后测量(Δ)设计。它包括一个结合认知和运动的项目,包括每周两次45分钟的TG训练。阅读和写作能力分别通过基于法语电池(BALE)的单词阅读任务和受ODÉDYS-2法语电池启发的单词听写任务来衡量。视觉空间取向和上肢协调参数分别采用判断线取向测验和Bruininks-Oseretsky运动熟练程度测验(第二版)短形式测验进行评价。结果:重复测量的双向方差分析显示,在所有测试中,CG和TG在干预前无显著差异。与干预前相比,TG组的阅读(p < 0.001, d = 1.19, Δ% = 15.07)和写作(p < 0.001, d = 1.13, Δ% = 19.69)得分在干预后显著提高。在视觉空间定向(p < 0.001, d = 0.97, Δ% = 63.50)和上肢协调性(p < 0.001, d = 0.69, Δ% = 110.42)评分方面获得了类似的结果。与干预前后相比,CG未见显著变化。结论:认知和运动相结合的训练方案可以使小脑更好地整合,从而改善阅读障碍儿童的阅读、写作和运动能力。进一步研究更多的阅读困难儿童将是探索这些问题的必要条件。
Combined Cognitive and Motor Training Improves Reading, Writing and Motor Coordination in Dyslexic Children.
Background/objectives: Different strategies were proposed to enhance dyslexic children's performance. This study aimed to investigate the effect of combined cognitive and motor training on reading, writing, and motor coordination in dyslexic children.
Methods: Twenty-four children with dyslexia (9.33 ± 0.48 years) were randomly allocated to either a Control (CG, 9.25 ± 0.45 years, n = 12) or a Trained Group (TG, 9.42 ± 0.51 years, n = 12). The intervention lasted eight weeks with a pre/post measurement (Δ) design in each group. It consisted of a combined cognitive and motor program composed of two 45 min sessions per week in TG. Reading and writing capabilities were measured using the word reading task based on the French battery (BALE) and the word dictation task, inspired by the ODÉDYS-2 French battery, respectively. The visuospatial orientation and the upper limb coordination parameters were evaluated using the Judgment of Line Orientation Test and Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency, second edition, short form test, respectively.
Results: Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures showed no significant difference between CG and TG in pre-intervention in all tests. Reading (p < 0.001, d = 1.19, Δ% = 15.07) and writing (p < 0.001, d = 1.13, Δ% = 19.69) scores increased significantly at post-compared to preintervention in the TG group. Comparable results were obtained in the visuospatial orientation (p < 0.001, d = 0.97, Δ% = 63.50) and the upper limb coordination (p < 0.001, d = 0.69, Δ% = 110.42) scores. No significant change was observed in CG comparing pre/post-intervention.
Conclusions: A combined cognitive and motor training program could allow better cerebellar integration, leading to the improvement in reading, writing, and motor abilities in children with dyslexia. Further studies on a larger number of dyslexic children will be necessary to explore such issues.