隐源性卒中的恶性肿瘤检查:加拿大卒中和血栓专家调查。

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200477
Laurence Poirier, Deborah M Siegal, Dominick Bossé, Jamie Brehaut, Brian Dewar, Ronda Lun, Michel Christopher Frank Shamy, Dar Dowlatshahi
{"title":"隐源性卒中的恶性肿瘤检查:加拿大卒中和血栓专家调查。","authors":"Laurence Poirier, Deborah M Siegal, Dominick Bossé, Jamie Brehaut, Brian Dewar, Ronda Lun, Michel Christopher Frank Shamy, Dar Dowlatshahi","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The diagnostic workup for patients with cryptogenic stroke includes investigating for occult cancer, which is known to increase the risk of stroke. Current guidelines do not provide specific recommendations regarding the optimal approach for occult cancer screening after cryptogenic stroke. We surveyed Canadian stroke and thrombosis physicians to determine current workup preferences for detecting occult cancer after cryptogenic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed and distributed an anonymous online survey targeting physicians who manage patients with cryptogenic stroke through professional memberships of the Canadian Stroke Consortium and Thrombosis Canada. Using 4 clinical scenarios representative of patients with cryptogenic stroke with different ages (younger or older than 50 years) and from both sexes, we asked respondents which tests they routinely recommend when investigating for occult cancer among a list of laboratory investigations, imaging, and procedures. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 138 responses to 5 survey questions. The most commonly recommended investigations were complete blood count (79%), creatinine (63%), and coagulation tests (56%), and the most frequently recommended imaging test was CT of the abdomen and pelvis (39%). A minority of respondents indicated they would order guideline-directed age-appropriate cancer screening. Approximately half of surveyed specialists deferred the workup of cancer to a primary care physician, and 12% did not suggest any cancer workup at all.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This survey of stroke and thrombosis experts found heterogeneity in testing for cancer screening in patients with cryptogenic stroke, with the majority either not screening at all or deferring tests to primary care providers. Our survey highlights the need for better evidence and evidence-based recommendations to guide the approach to cancer screening in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 3","pages":"e200477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malignancy Workup in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Survey of Canadian Stroke and Thrombosis Experts.\",\"authors\":\"Laurence Poirier, Deborah M Siegal, Dominick Bossé, Jamie Brehaut, Brian Dewar, Ronda Lun, Michel Christopher Frank Shamy, Dar Dowlatshahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The diagnostic workup for patients with cryptogenic stroke includes investigating for occult cancer, which is known to increase the risk of stroke. Current guidelines do not provide specific recommendations regarding the optimal approach for occult cancer screening after cryptogenic stroke. We surveyed Canadian stroke and thrombosis physicians to determine current workup preferences for detecting occult cancer after cryptogenic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed and distributed an anonymous online survey targeting physicians who manage patients with cryptogenic stroke through professional memberships of the Canadian Stroke Consortium and Thrombosis Canada. Using 4 clinical scenarios representative of patients with cryptogenic stroke with different ages (younger or older than 50 years) and from both sexes, we asked respondents which tests they routinely recommend when investigating for occult cancer among a list of laboratory investigations, imaging, and procedures. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 138 responses to 5 survey questions. The most commonly recommended investigations were complete blood count (79%), creatinine (63%), and coagulation tests (56%), and the most frequently recommended imaging test was CT of the abdomen and pelvis (39%). A minority of respondents indicated they would order guideline-directed age-appropriate cancer screening. Approximately half of surveyed specialists deferred the workup of cancer to a primary care physician, and 12% did not suggest any cancer workup at all.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This survey of stroke and thrombosis experts found heterogeneity in testing for cancer screening in patients with cryptogenic stroke, with the majority either not screening at all or deferring tests to primary care providers. Our survey highlights the need for better evidence and evidence-based recommendations to guide the approach to cancer screening in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"e200477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051394/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:隐源性卒中患者的诊断检查包括调查隐匿性癌症,这是已知的增加卒中风险的因素。目前的指南没有提供关于隐源性卒中后隐匿性癌症筛查的最佳方法的具体建议。我们调查了加拿大的中风和血栓医生,以确定目前对隐源性中风后发现隐匿性癌症的检查偏好。方法:我们设计并分发了一项匿名在线调查,目标是通过加拿大卒中协会和加拿大血栓形成协会的专业会员管理隐源性卒中患者的医生。我们选取了4例不同年龄(小于或大于50岁)、男女隐性脑卒中患者的临床案例,询问受访者在调查隐匿性癌症时,在一系列实验室检查、影像学检查和手术中,他们通常推荐哪些检查。结果采用描述性统计进行分析。结果:我们收到了5个调查问题的138份回复。最常推荐的检查是全血细胞计数(79%)、肌酐(63%)和凝血检查(56%),最常推荐的影像学检查是腹部和骨盆的CT检查(39%)。少数受访者表示,他们将要求指南指导的适合年龄的癌症筛查。大约一半的被调查专家将癌症检查推迟到初级保健医生那里,12%的人根本不建议任何癌症检查。讨论:这项对卒中和血栓专家的调查发现,在隐源性卒中患者的癌症筛查测试中存在异质性,大多数患者要么根本不筛查,要么将测试推迟到初级保健提供者。我们的调查强调需要更好的证据和基于证据的建议来指导这一人群的癌症筛查方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Malignancy Workup in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Survey of Canadian Stroke and Thrombosis Experts.

Background and objectives: The diagnostic workup for patients with cryptogenic stroke includes investigating for occult cancer, which is known to increase the risk of stroke. Current guidelines do not provide specific recommendations regarding the optimal approach for occult cancer screening after cryptogenic stroke. We surveyed Canadian stroke and thrombosis physicians to determine current workup preferences for detecting occult cancer after cryptogenic stroke.

Methods: We designed and distributed an anonymous online survey targeting physicians who manage patients with cryptogenic stroke through professional memberships of the Canadian Stroke Consortium and Thrombosis Canada. Using 4 clinical scenarios representative of patients with cryptogenic stroke with different ages (younger or older than 50 years) and from both sexes, we asked respondents which tests they routinely recommend when investigating for occult cancer among a list of laboratory investigations, imaging, and procedures. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: We received 138 responses to 5 survey questions. The most commonly recommended investigations were complete blood count (79%), creatinine (63%), and coagulation tests (56%), and the most frequently recommended imaging test was CT of the abdomen and pelvis (39%). A minority of respondents indicated they would order guideline-directed age-appropriate cancer screening. Approximately half of surveyed specialists deferred the workup of cancer to a primary care physician, and 12% did not suggest any cancer workup at all.

Discussion: This survey of stroke and thrombosis experts found heterogeneity in testing for cancer screening in patients with cryptogenic stroke, with the majority either not screening at all or deferring tests to primary care providers. Our survey highlights the need for better evidence and evidence-based recommendations to guide the approach to cancer screening in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信