视频和直接喉镜在医学生插管训练中的作用:成功率和学习曲线的比较研究。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mustafa Öcal
{"title":"视频和直接喉镜在医学生插管训练中的作用:成功率和学习曲线的比较研究。","authors":"Mustafa Öcal","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07239-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct laryngoscopy (DL) is widely recognized as the most commonly used method for tracheal intubation. However, growing evidence highlights the increasingly prominent role of video laryngoscopy (VL) in the management of difficult airways. This study aimed to determine the most effective medical education method to equip medical students with this critical skill. In addition to evaluating the contributions of an intubation training program utilizing direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy to tracheal intubation success among inexperienced medical students, we also aimed to explore the potential benefits of combining these two techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mannequin-based study included 130 medical students. Before the study began, participants attended a 30-minute theoretical training session. Participants were randomly assigned to start with one of two scenarios. In each scenario, participants were given three attempts to perform intubation using each laryngoscope. The maximum allowable time for each intubation was set at 3 min. Students who successfully intubated within 3 min were recorded as successful, while those who failed to do so were recorded as unsuccessful.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated that VL provided higher success rates and shorter intubation times, particularly during the first and second attempts. However, it is noteworthy that no significant difference in success rates was observed between VL and DL during the third attempt.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the necessity of integrating both VL and DL methods in intubation training programs. The combination of both approaches allows students to achieve quick initial results while progressively developing proficiency for more complex scenarios over time.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of video and direct laryngoscopy in medical student intubation training: a comparative study on success rates and learning curves.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Öcal\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-07239-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct laryngoscopy (DL) is widely recognized as the most commonly used method for tracheal intubation. However, growing evidence highlights the increasingly prominent role of video laryngoscopy (VL) in the management of difficult airways. This study aimed to determine the most effective medical education method to equip medical students with this critical skill. In addition to evaluating the contributions of an intubation training program utilizing direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy to tracheal intubation success among inexperienced medical students, we also aimed to explore the potential benefits of combining these two techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mannequin-based study included 130 medical students. Before the study began, participants attended a 30-minute theoretical training session. Participants were randomly assigned to start with one of two scenarios. In each scenario, participants were given three attempts to perform intubation using each laryngoscope. The maximum allowable time for each intubation was set at 3 min. Students who successfully intubated within 3 min were recorded as successful, while those who failed to do so were recorded as unsuccessful.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated that VL provided higher success rates and shorter intubation times, particularly during the first and second attempts. However, it is noteworthy that no significant difference in success rates was observed between VL and DL during the third attempt.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the necessity of integrating both VL and DL methods in intubation training programs. The combination of both approaches allows students to achieve quick initial results while progressively developing proficiency for more complex scenarios over time.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070604/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07239-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07239-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:直接喉镜检查(DL)是公认的最常用的气管插管方法。然而,越来越多的证据强调视频喉镜(VL)在困难气道管理中的作用日益突出。本研究旨在确定医学生掌握这项关键技能的最有效的医学教育方法。除了评估使用直接喉镜和视频喉镜的插管训练计划对经验不足的医学生气管插管成功的贡献外,我们还旨在探索将这两种技术结合起来的潜在好处。方法:该研究以人体模型为基础,包括130名医学生。在研究开始之前,参与者参加了一个30分钟的理论培训课程。参与者被随机分配到两种场景中的一种。在每种情况下,参与者被给予三次尝试使用每个喉镜进行插管。每次插管的最大允许时间为3分钟,在3分钟内插管成功者记录为成功,不成功者记录为不成功。结果:研究表明,VL提供了更高的成功率和更短的插管时间,特别是在第一次和第二次尝试。然而,值得注意的是,在第三次尝试中,VL和DL之间的成功率没有显着差异。结论:本研究强调了在插管训练计划中整合VL和DL方法的必要性。两种方法的结合使学生能够快速获得初步结果,同时随着时间的推移逐步熟练掌握更复杂的场景。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of video and direct laryngoscopy in medical student intubation training: a comparative study on success rates and learning curves.

Background: Direct laryngoscopy (DL) is widely recognized as the most commonly used method for tracheal intubation. However, growing evidence highlights the increasingly prominent role of video laryngoscopy (VL) in the management of difficult airways. This study aimed to determine the most effective medical education method to equip medical students with this critical skill. In addition to evaluating the contributions of an intubation training program utilizing direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy to tracheal intubation success among inexperienced medical students, we also aimed to explore the potential benefits of combining these two techniques.

Methods: This mannequin-based study included 130 medical students. Before the study began, participants attended a 30-minute theoretical training session. Participants were randomly assigned to start with one of two scenarios. In each scenario, participants were given three attempts to perform intubation using each laryngoscope. The maximum allowable time for each intubation was set at 3 min. Students who successfully intubated within 3 min were recorded as successful, while those who failed to do so were recorded as unsuccessful.

Results: The study demonstrated that VL provided higher success rates and shorter intubation times, particularly during the first and second attempts. However, it is noteworthy that no significant difference in success rates was observed between VL and DL during the third attempt.

Conclusion: This study highlights the necessity of integrating both VL and DL methods in intubation training programs. The combination of both approaches allows students to achieve quick initial results while progressively developing proficiency for more complex scenarios over time.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信