牛剩余采食量与甲烷排放性状关系的系统综述与荟萃分析。

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Tainara Luana da Silva Soares, Júlia de Paula Soares Valente, Fernanda Larissa Cesar Santos, Kelvin Rodrigues Kelles, Taiana da Silva Soares, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
{"title":"牛剩余采食量与甲烷排放性状关系的系统综述与荟萃分析。","authors":"Tainara Luana da Silva Soares, Júlia de Paula Soares Valente, Fernanda Larissa Cesar Santos, Kelvin Rodrigues Kelles, Taiana da Silva Soares, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante","doi":"10.1007/s11250-025-04423-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between RFI (residual feed intake) and traits related to methane emissions in cattle. Searches were performed in PubMed and Web of Science using keywords in English. The selected studies compared traits related to methane emissions between animals with divergent RFI and/or the correlation between traits related to methane emissions and RFI. Meta-analysis was performed for traits showing three or more uncorrelated results. After application of the exclusion and inclusion criteria, 27 studies were included in the present review. Meta-analysis of the comparison of means was possible for seven traits and meta-analysis of phenotypic correlations for three traits. CH<sub>4</sub> emission (g/day) was significantly lower in negative RFI animals and was positively correlated with RFI, indicating that animals with lower dry matter intake without affecting production traits (low RFI) emit less CH<sub>4</sub> into the environment. However, the results for the other traits evaluated were inconclusive due to insufficient data for meta-analysis. Meta-analyses clearly demonstrated that cattle with lower RFI emit less enteric methane. The primary reason why more efficient animals emit less enteric methane appears to be the reduced availability of substrate for fermentation. Therefore, genetic selection of cattle for feed efficiency, beyond reducing feed costs within the production system, plays a critical role in promoting environmentally sustainable production.</p>","PeriodicalId":23329,"journal":{"name":"Tropical animal health and production","volume":"57 3","pages":"171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and meta-analysis: relationship between residual feed intake and traits related to methane emissions in cattle.\",\"authors\":\"Tainara Luana da Silva Soares, Júlia de Paula Soares Valente, Fernanda Larissa Cesar Santos, Kelvin Rodrigues Kelles, Taiana da Silva Soares, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11250-025-04423-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between RFI (residual feed intake) and traits related to methane emissions in cattle. Searches were performed in PubMed and Web of Science using keywords in English. The selected studies compared traits related to methane emissions between animals with divergent RFI and/or the correlation between traits related to methane emissions and RFI. Meta-analysis was performed for traits showing three or more uncorrelated results. After application of the exclusion and inclusion criteria, 27 studies were included in the present review. Meta-analysis of the comparison of means was possible for seven traits and meta-analysis of phenotypic correlations for three traits. CH<sub>4</sub> emission (g/day) was significantly lower in negative RFI animals and was positively correlated with RFI, indicating that animals with lower dry matter intake without affecting production traits (low RFI) emit less CH<sub>4</sub> into the environment. However, the results for the other traits evaluated were inconclusive due to insufficient data for meta-analysis. Meta-analyses clearly demonstrated that cattle with lower RFI emit less enteric methane. The primary reason why more efficient animals emit less enteric methane appears to be the reduced availability of substrate for fermentation. Therefore, genetic selection of cattle for feed efficiency, beyond reducing feed costs within the production system, plays a critical role in promoting environmentally sustainable production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical animal health and production\",\"volume\":\"57 3\",\"pages\":\"171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical animal health and production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04423-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical animal health and production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04423-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估牛剩余采食量(RFI)与甲烷排放相关性状之间的关系。在PubMed和Web of Science中使用英文关键词进行搜索。选定的研究比较了不同RFI动物之间与甲烷排放相关的性状和/或甲烷排放与RFI相关性状之间的相关性。对显示三个或更多不相关结果的性状进行meta分析。在应用排除和纳入标准后,本综述纳入了27项研究。对7个性状的均数比较进行了meta分析,对3个性状的表型相关性进行了meta分析。负RFI动物的CH4排放量(g/d)显著降低,且与RFI呈正相关,说明在不影响生产性状的情况下,干物质采食量较低的动物(低RFI)向环境排放的CH4较少。然而,由于荟萃分析的数据不足,其他特征的评估结果尚无定论。荟萃分析清楚地表明,RFI较低的牛排放的肠道甲烷较少。效率更高的动物排放较少肠道甲烷的主要原因似乎是发酵底物的可用性降低。因此,除了降低生产系统内的饲料成本外,为提高饲料效率而进行的牛的遗传选择在促进环境可持续生产方面也发挥着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review and meta-analysis: relationship between residual feed intake and traits related to methane emissions in cattle.

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between RFI (residual feed intake) and traits related to methane emissions in cattle. Searches were performed in PubMed and Web of Science using keywords in English. The selected studies compared traits related to methane emissions between animals with divergent RFI and/or the correlation between traits related to methane emissions and RFI. Meta-analysis was performed for traits showing three or more uncorrelated results. After application of the exclusion and inclusion criteria, 27 studies were included in the present review. Meta-analysis of the comparison of means was possible for seven traits and meta-analysis of phenotypic correlations for three traits. CH4 emission (g/day) was significantly lower in negative RFI animals and was positively correlated with RFI, indicating that animals with lower dry matter intake without affecting production traits (low RFI) emit less CH4 into the environment. However, the results for the other traits evaluated were inconclusive due to insufficient data for meta-analysis. Meta-analyses clearly demonstrated that cattle with lower RFI emit less enteric methane. The primary reason why more efficient animals emit less enteric methane appears to be the reduced availability of substrate for fermentation. Therefore, genetic selection of cattle for feed efficiency, beyond reducing feed costs within the production system, plays a critical role in promoting environmentally sustainable production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical animal health and production
Tropical animal health and production 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Animal Health and Production is an international journal publishing the results of original research in any field of animal health, welfare, and production with the aim of improving health and productivity of livestock, and better utilisation of animal resources, including wildlife in tropical, subtropical and similar agro-ecological environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信