平衡隐私,信任和公平:患者对物质使用障碍数据共享的看法。

3区 综合性期刊
Mengyi Wei, Michael Todd, Aimee N C Campbell, Darwyn Chern, Eric Lott, Mary J Whitfield, Nick Stavros, Elise Greenberg, Adela Grando
{"title":"平衡隐私,信任和公平:患者对物质使用障碍数据共享的看法。","authors":"Mengyi Wei, Michael Todd, Aimee N C Campbell, Darwyn Chern, Eric Lott, Mary J Whitfield, Nick Stavros, Elise Greenberg, Adela Grando","doi":"10.3390/ijerph22040617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sharing substance use disorder (SUD) data is essential for advancing equitable healthcare and improving outcomes for marginalized populations. However, concerns about privacy, stigma, and adherence to data privacy regulations often hinder effective data sharing. This study explores patient preferences and considerations related to sharing SUD-related medical records, with a focus on the sociocultural and systemic factors that shape their willingness to share.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 357 adult patients from four community-based clinics in Arizona participated in a cross-sectional electronic survey. The survey assessed sociodemographic factors, experiences of stigma (self-directed, anticipated, and provider-based), trust in healthcare providers, satisfaction with care, and willingness to share SUD data across various scenarios. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and one-way ANOVA to uncover key associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients identified SUD history, diagnoses, and treatment information as particularly sensitive. Stigma was significantly correlated with increased sensitivity and reduced willingness to share data, especially with providers outside their primary facility (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In contrast, trust in providers and higher satisfaction with care were linked to greater willingness to share data with all providers (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Patients were more inclined to share SUD data during emergencies or for direct treatment purposes than for administrative or research applications (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings underscore the ethical imperative to address stigma and foster trust to promote equitable SUD data sharing. Policies must empower patients with control over sensitive health information while ensuring cultural competence and fairness in care delivery. Ensuring that patients feel confident in how their data are used may encourage greater participation in health information exchange, ultimately supporting more effective and individualized SUD care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12027209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Privacy, Trust, and Equity: Patient Perspectives on Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing.\",\"authors\":\"Mengyi Wei, Michael Todd, Aimee N C Campbell, Darwyn Chern, Eric Lott, Mary J Whitfield, Nick Stavros, Elise Greenberg, Adela Grando\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijerph22040617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sharing substance use disorder (SUD) data is essential for advancing equitable healthcare and improving outcomes for marginalized populations. However, concerns about privacy, stigma, and adherence to data privacy regulations often hinder effective data sharing. This study explores patient preferences and considerations related to sharing SUD-related medical records, with a focus on the sociocultural and systemic factors that shape their willingness to share.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 357 adult patients from four community-based clinics in Arizona participated in a cross-sectional electronic survey. The survey assessed sociodemographic factors, experiences of stigma (self-directed, anticipated, and provider-based), trust in healthcare providers, satisfaction with care, and willingness to share SUD data across various scenarios. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and one-way ANOVA to uncover key associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients identified SUD history, diagnoses, and treatment information as particularly sensitive. Stigma was significantly correlated with increased sensitivity and reduced willingness to share data, especially with providers outside their primary facility (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In contrast, trust in providers and higher satisfaction with care were linked to greater willingness to share data with all providers (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Patients were more inclined to share SUD data during emergencies or for direct treatment purposes than for administrative or research applications (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings underscore the ethical imperative to address stigma and foster trust to promote equitable SUD data sharing. Policies must empower patients with control over sensitive health information while ensuring cultural competence and fairness in care delivery. Ensuring that patients feel confident in how their data are used may encourage greater participation in health information exchange, ultimately supporting more effective and individualized SUD care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12027209/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22040617\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22040617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:共享物质使用障碍(SUD)数据对于促进公平医疗和改善边缘化人群的结果至关重要。然而,对隐私、污名化和遵守数据隐私法规的担忧往往会阻碍有效的数据共享。本研究探讨了患者对共享与sud相关的医疗记录的偏好和考虑因素,重点关注影响他们共享意愿的社会文化和系统因素。方法:来自亚利桑那州四个社区诊所的357名成年患者参加了横断面电子调查。该调查评估了社会人口学因素、污名经历(自我导向、预期和基于提供者)、对医疗保健提供者的信任、对护理的满意度以及在各种情况下共享SUD数据的意愿。使用描述性统计、Pearson相关性和单因素方差分析分析数据以发现关键关联。结果:患者对SUD病史、诊断和治疗信息的识别特别敏感。污名与敏感性增加和数据共享意愿降低显著相关,特别是与主要机构以外的提供者(p < 0.001)。相比之下,对提供者的信任和对护理的更高满意度与与所有提供者共享数据的更大意愿相关(p < 0.01)。与行政管理或研究应用相比,患者更倾向于在紧急情况下或出于直接治疗目的共享SUD数据(p < 0.001)。讨论:这些发现强调了解决耻辱感和培养信任以促进公平的SUD数据共享的道德必要性。政策必须赋予患者对敏感健康信息的控制权,同时确保提供护理的文化能力和公平性。确保患者对其数据的使用方式有信心,可以鼓励更多地参与健康信息交流,最终支持更有效和个性化的SUD护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing Privacy, Trust, and Equity: Patient Perspectives on Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing.

Background: Sharing substance use disorder (SUD) data is essential for advancing equitable healthcare and improving outcomes for marginalized populations. However, concerns about privacy, stigma, and adherence to data privacy regulations often hinder effective data sharing. This study explores patient preferences and considerations related to sharing SUD-related medical records, with a focus on the sociocultural and systemic factors that shape their willingness to share.

Methods: A total of 357 adult patients from four community-based clinics in Arizona participated in a cross-sectional electronic survey. The survey assessed sociodemographic factors, experiences of stigma (self-directed, anticipated, and provider-based), trust in healthcare providers, satisfaction with care, and willingness to share SUD data across various scenarios. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and one-way ANOVA to uncover key associations.

Results: Patients identified SUD history, diagnoses, and treatment information as particularly sensitive. Stigma was significantly correlated with increased sensitivity and reduced willingness to share data, especially with providers outside their primary facility (p < 0.001). In contrast, trust in providers and higher satisfaction with care were linked to greater willingness to share data with all providers (p < 0.01). Patients were more inclined to share SUD data during emergencies or for direct treatment purposes than for administrative or research applications (p < 0.001).

Discussion: These findings underscore the ethical imperative to address stigma and foster trust to promote equitable SUD data sharing. Policies must empower patients with control over sensitive health information while ensuring cultural competence and fairness in care delivery. Ensuring that patients feel confident in how their data are used may encourage greater participation in health information exchange, ultimately supporting more effective and individualized SUD care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信