Shu-Gang Liu, Xin-Jian Xu, Ming He, Ji-Dong Zhao, Lin Pei
{"title":"根治性食管切除术患者围手术期影响预后的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Shu-Gang Liu, Xin-Jian Xu, Ming He, Ji-Dong Zhao, Lin Pei","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.103483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal cancer constitutes one of the most aggressive malignant neoplasms associated with poor clinical outcomes. While surgical resection remains the cornerstone of curative intervention, optimization of perioperative care protocols has emerged as an essential strategy to reduce postoperative complications and potentially improve long-term survival rates in patients undergoing esophagectomy. However, substantial debate persists regarding the relative importance of various perioperative risk factors and their impact on post-resection outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify perioperative factors affecting prognosis after radical esophagectomy, aiming to improve patient outcomes through targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study analyzed 378 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent radical esophagectomy (McKeown, Sweet, or Ivor-Lewis procedures) from January 2022 through December 2023. All operations were performed by experienced surgeons following standardized perioperative protocols. The investigation gathered data on patient demographics, surgical parameters, tumor pathology (using the 8<sup>th</sup> edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system), and survival outcomes. Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards modeling, with adjustment for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified three independent predictors of survival: Tumor-node-metastasis staging [Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.72-3.10, <i>P</i> < 0.001], tumor differentiation (moderate: HR = 1.46, 95%CI: 1.02-2.09, <i>P</i> = 0.038; poor: HR = 2.15, 95%CI: 1.47-3.14, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and extended postoperative analgesic use (> 5 days) (HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.08-1.89, <i>P</i> = 0.012). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly lower overall survival rates in patients requiring analgesics for > 5 days compared to ≤ 5 days (<i>P</i> = 0.003), with consistent patterns observed for both opioid (<i>P</i> = 0.019) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (<i>P</i> = 0.028). The extended analgesic group exhibited a higher proportion of elderly patients (48.47% <i>vs</i> 35.57%, <i>P</i> = 0.015), while other baseline characteristics and tumor features remained comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tumor-node-metastasis staging, tumor differentiation, and duration of postoperative analgesic use independently predict survival following radical esophagectomy, underscoring the significance of optimal pain management protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 4","pages":"103483"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative risk factors for prognosis in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Shu-Gang Liu, Xin-Jian Xu, Ming He, Ji-Dong Zhao, Lin Pei\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.103483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal cancer constitutes one of the most aggressive malignant neoplasms associated with poor clinical outcomes. While surgical resection remains the cornerstone of curative intervention, optimization of perioperative care protocols has emerged as an essential strategy to reduce postoperative complications and potentially improve long-term survival rates in patients undergoing esophagectomy. However, substantial debate persists regarding the relative importance of various perioperative risk factors and their impact on post-resection outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify perioperative factors affecting prognosis after radical esophagectomy, aiming to improve patient outcomes through targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study analyzed 378 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent radical esophagectomy (McKeown, Sweet, or Ivor-Lewis procedures) from January 2022 through December 2023. All operations were performed by experienced surgeons following standardized perioperative protocols. The investigation gathered data on patient demographics, surgical parameters, tumor pathology (using the 8<sup>th</sup> edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system), and survival outcomes. Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards modeling, with adjustment for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified three independent predictors of survival: Tumor-node-metastasis staging [Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.72-3.10, <i>P</i> < 0.001], tumor differentiation (moderate: HR = 1.46, 95%CI: 1.02-2.09, <i>P</i> = 0.038; poor: HR = 2.15, 95%CI: 1.47-3.14, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and extended postoperative analgesic use (> 5 days) (HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.08-1.89, <i>P</i> = 0.012). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly lower overall survival rates in patients requiring analgesics for > 5 days compared to ≤ 5 days (<i>P</i> = 0.003), with consistent patterns observed for both opioid (<i>P</i> = 0.019) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (<i>P</i> = 0.028). The extended analgesic group exhibited a higher proportion of elderly patients (48.47% <i>vs</i> 35.57%, <i>P</i> = 0.015), while other baseline characteristics and tumor features remained comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tumor-node-metastasis staging, tumor differentiation, and duration of postoperative analgesic use independently predict survival following radical esophagectomy, underscoring the significance of optimal pain management protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"103483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019067/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.103483\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.103483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:食管癌是最具侵袭性的恶性肿瘤之一,临床预后较差。虽然手术切除仍然是根治性干预的基石,但优化围手术期护理方案已成为减少术后并发症和提高食管切除术患者长期生存率的重要策略。然而,关于各种围手术期危险因素的相对重要性及其对术后预后的影响,仍存在实质性的争论。目的:探讨影响根治性食管切除术术后预后的围手术期因素,通过有针对性的干预措施改善患者预后。方法:一项回顾性研究分析了2022年1月至2023年12月期间接受根治性食管切除术(McKeown、Sweet或Ivor-Lewis手术)的378例食管癌患者。所有手术均由经验丰富的外科医生按照标准化围手术期方案进行。调查收集了患者人口统计学、手术参数、肿瘤病理(使用第8版美国癌症分期系统联合委员会)和生存结果的数据。统计分析采用Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox比例风险模型,并对混杂变量进行调整。结果:多因素Cox比例风险分析确定了三个独立的生存预测因素:肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期[风险比(HR) = 2.31, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.72-3.10, P < 0.001],肿瘤分化(中度:HR = 1.46, 95%CI: 1.02-2.09, P = 0.038;不良:HR = 2.15, 95%CI: 1.47 ~ 3.14, P < 0.001),术后延长使用镇痛药(> ~ 5天)(HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.08 ~ 1.89, P = 0.012)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,与≤5天的患者相比,需要使用镇痛药的患者总生存率显著降低(P = 0.003),阿片类药物(P = 0.019)和非甾体类抗炎药(P = 0.028)的患者总生存率一致。延长镇痛组的老年患者比例更高(48.47% vs 35.57%, P = 0.015),而其他基线特征和肿瘤特征在两组之间保持可比性。结论:肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期、肿瘤分化和术后镇痛药使用时间独立预测根治性食管切除术后的生存,强调最佳疼痛管理方案的重要性。
Perioperative risk factors for prognosis in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy: A retrospective study.
Background: Esophageal cancer constitutes one of the most aggressive malignant neoplasms associated with poor clinical outcomes. While surgical resection remains the cornerstone of curative intervention, optimization of perioperative care protocols has emerged as an essential strategy to reduce postoperative complications and potentially improve long-term survival rates in patients undergoing esophagectomy. However, substantial debate persists regarding the relative importance of various perioperative risk factors and their impact on post-resection outcomes.
Aim: To identify perioperative factors affecting prognosis after radical esophagectomy, aiming to improve patient outcomes through targeted interventions.
Methods: A retrospective study analyzed 378 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent radical esophagectomy (McKeown, Sweet, or Ivor-Lewis procedures) from January 2022 through December 2023. All operations were performed by experienced surgeons following standardized perioperative protocols. The investigation gathered data on patient demographics, surgical parameters, tumor pathology (using the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system), and survival outcomes. Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards modeling, with adjustment for confounding variables.
Results: Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified three independent predictors of survival: Tumor-node-metastasis staging [Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.72-3.10, P < 0.001], tumor differentiation (moderate: HR = 1.46, 95%CI: 1.02-2.09, P = 0.038; poor: HR = 2.15, 95%CI: 1.47-3.14, P < 0.001), and extended postoperative analgesic use (> 5 days) (HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.08-1.89, P = 0.012). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly lower overall survival rates in patients requiring analgesics for > 5 days compared to ≤ 5 days (P = 0.003), with consistent patterns observed for both opioid (P = 0.019) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (P = 0.028). The extended analgesic group exhibited a higher proportion of elderly patients (48.47% vs 35.57%, P = 0.015), while other baseline characteristics and tumor features remained comparable between groups.
Conclusion: Tumor-node-metastasis staging, tumor differentiation, and duration of postoperative analgesic use independently predict survival following radical esophagectomy, underscoring the significance of optimal pain management protocols.