下颌弓类型在全上-4和全上-5牙种植体设计中的生物力学效应评价:三维有限元分析。

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Sema Nur Sevinç Gül, Fahri Murat, Abdullah Tahir Şensoy
{"title":"下颌弓类型在全上-4和全上-5牙种植体设计中的生物力学效应评价:三维有限元分析。","authors":"Sema Nur Sevinç Gül, Fahri Murat, Abdullah Tahir Şensoy","doi":"10.3390/jfb16040134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the biomechanical effects of different implant configurations in various mandibular arch types using finite element analysis (FEA). Stress distribution and deformation patterns were analyzed under different loading conditions in square, U-shaped, and V-shaped arches. The results indicate that increasing the number of implants generally reduces cortical bone stress, particularly in U and V arches, while implant-level stress tends to increase. Under molar loading, cortical bone stress in the square arch decreased by 16.9% (from 90.61 MPa to 75.27 MPa) with the All-on-5 system, while implant stress in the V arch dropped by 46.26% (from 142.35 MPa to 76.5 MPa). Additionally, the cantilever effect in All-on-4 configurations resulted in higher stress on the prosthesis and implants, particularly in V arches. While the All-on-5 system provided better load distribution, the study highlights the importance of optimizing implant positioning based on mandibular anatomy. Despite limitations such as the use of static forces and standardized arch types, these findings offer valuable insights into the biomechanical performance of full-arch implant rehabilitations, supporting future clinical applications and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12027784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Biomechanical Effects of Mandible Arch Types in All-on-4 and All-on-5 Dental Implant Design: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sema Nur Sevinç Gül, Fahri Murat, Abdullah Tahir Şensoy\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jfb16040134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluates the biomechanical effects of different implant configurations in various mandibular arch types using finite element analysis (FEA). Stress distribution and deformation patterns were analyzed under different loading conditions in square, U-shaped, and V-shaped arches. The results indicate that increasing the number of implants generally reduces cortical bone stress, particularly in U and V arches, while implant-level stress tends to increase. Under molar loading, cortical bone stress in the square arch decreased by 16.9% (from 90.61 MPa to 75.27 MPa) with the All-on-5 system, while implant stress in the V arch dropped by 46.26% (from 142.35 MPa to 76.5 MPa). Additionally, the cantilever effect in All-on-4 configurations resulted in higher stress on the prosthesis and implants, particularly in V arches. While the All-on-5 system provided better load distribution, the study highlights the importance of optimizing implant positioning based on mandibular anatomy. Despite limitations such as the use of static forces and standardized arch types, these findings offer valuable insights into the biomechanical performance of full-arch implant rehabilitations, supporting future clinical applications and research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Functional Biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12027784/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Functional Biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16040134\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16040134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用有限元分析(FEA)评估不同种植体配置在不同类型下颌弓中的生物力学效应。分析了方形拱、u形拱和v形拱在不同加载条件下的应力分布和变形规律。结果表明,增加种植体数量通常会降低皮质骨应力,特别是在U和V弓,而种植体水平的应力有增加的趋势。在磨牙负荷下,采用All-on-5系统后,方弓的骨皮质应力下降了16.9%(从90.61 MPa降至75.27 MPa), V弓的种植体应力下降了46.26%(从142.35 MPa降至76.5 MPa)。此外,All-on-4结构的悬臂效应导致假体和种植体承受更高的应力,特别是在V型弓中。虽然All-on-5系统提供了更好的负载分配,但该研究强调了基于下颌解剖结构优化种植体定位的重要性。尽管存在诸如使用静力和标准化弓类型等限制,但这些研究结果为全弓种植体康复的生物力学性能提供了有价值的见解,为未来的临床应用和研究提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Biomechanical Effects of Mandible Arch Types in All-on-4 and All-on-5 Dental Implant Design: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.

This study evaluates the biomechanical effects of different implant configurations in various mandibular arch types using finite element analysis (FEA). Stress distribution and deformation patterns were analyzed under different loading conditions in square, U-shaped, and V-shaped arches. The results indicate that increasing the number of implants generally reduces cortical bone stress, particularly in U and V arches, while implant-level stress tends to increase. Under molar loading, cortical bone stress in the square arch decreased by 16.9% (from 90.61 MPa to 75.27 MPa) with the All-on-5 system, while implant stress in the V arch dropped by 46.26% (from 142.35 MPa to 76.5 MPa). Additionally, the cantilever effect in All-on-4 configurations resulted in higher stress on the prosthesis and implants, particularly in V arches. While the All-on-5 system provided better load distribution, the study highlights the importance of optimizing implant positioning based on mandibular anatomy. Despite limitations such as the use of static forces and standardized arch types, these findings offer valuable insights into the biomechanical performance of full-arch implant rehabilitations, supporting future clinical applications and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Journal of Functional Biomaterials Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Functional Biomaterials (JFB, ISSN 2079-4983) is an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes regular research papers (articles), reviews and short communications about applications of materials for biomedical use. JFB covers subjects from chemistry, pharmacy, biology, physics over to engineering. The journal focuses on the preparation, performance and use of functional biomaterials in biomedical devices and their behaviour in physiological environments. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Several topical special issues will be published. Scope: adhesion, adsorption, biocompatibility, biohybrid materials, bio-inert materials, biomaterials, biomedical devices, biomimetic materials, bone repair, cardiovascular devices, ceramics, composite materials, dental implants, dental materials, drug delivery systems, functional biopolymers, glasses, hyper branched polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), nanomedicine, nanoparticles, nanotechnology, natural materials, self-assembly smart materials, stimuli responsive materials, surface modification, tissue devices, tissue engineering, tissue-derived materials, urological devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信