冷冻胚胎移植:子宫内膜最佳制备方法综述。

Aikaterini Selntigia, Francesco Gebbia, Ana Del Arco, Antonio Pellicer, Daniela Galliano
{"title":"冷冻胚胎移植:子宫内膜最佳制备方法综述。","authors":"Aikaterini Selntigia, Francesco Gebbia, Ana Del Arco, Antonio Pellicer, Daniela Galliano","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09631-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) has become a widely adopted method in assisted reproductive technology (ART), thanks to the advancements in vitrification techniques. FET now accounts for a significant proportion of ART cycles, but there is still no clear consensus on the optimal protocol for endometrial preparation. This review aims to evaluate the reproductive outcomes of three commonly used FET protocols: natural cycle (NC), modified natural cycle (mNC), and artificial cycle (AC), with a focus on implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates (CPR), live birth rates (LBR), and obstetric complications such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and preeclampsia (PE).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Studies published between 2014 and 2024 were reviewed and compared across these protocols.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>The results show that NC and mNC protocols are associated with higher CPR and LBR compared to AC. AC, on the other hand, is linked to an increased risk of HDP and PE, likely due to the absence of a functional corpus luteum (CL), which plays a vital role in early pregnancy support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of a CL appears to be crucial for minimizing obstetric complications, making NC and mNC preferable options. Future research is needed to refine FET protocols, focusing on personalized approaches to endometrial preparation that optimize both pregnancy outcomes and maternal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":94143,"journal":{"name":"Minerva medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frozen embryo-transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation.\",\"authors\":\"Aikaterini Selntigia, Francesco Gebbia, Ana Del Arco, Antonio Pellicer, Daniela Galliano\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09631-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) has become a widely adopted method in assisted reproductive technology (ART), thanks to the advancements in vitrification techniques. FET now accounts for a significant proportion of ART cycles, but there is still no clear consensus on the optimal protocol for endometrial preparation. This review aims to evaluate the reproductive outcomes of three commonly used FET protocols: natural cycle (NC), modified natural cycle (mNC), and artificial cycle (AC), with a focus on implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates (CPR), live birth rates (LBR), and obstetric complications such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and preeclampsia (PE).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Studies published between 2014 and 2024 were reviewed and compared across these protocols.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>The results show that NC and mNC protocols are associated with higher CPR and LBR compared to AC. AC, on the other hand, is linked to an increased risk of HDP and PE, likely due to the absence of a functional corpus luteum (CL), which plays a vital role in early pregnancy support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of a CL appears to be crucial for minimizing obstetric complications, making NC and mNC preferable options. Future research is needed to refine FET protocols, focusing on personalized approaches to endometrial preparation that optimize both pregnancy outcomes and maternal health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09631-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4806.25.09631-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:由于玻璃化技术的进步,冷冻解冻胚胎移植(FET)已成为辅助生殖技术(ART)中广泛采用的方法。FET目前占ART周期的很大比例,但对于子宫内膜准备的最佳方案仍然没有明确的共识。本综述旨在评估三种常用的FET方案:自然周期(NC)、改良自然周期(mNC)和人工周期(AC)的生殖结局,重点关注着床率、临床妊娠率(CPR)、活产率(LBR)和产科并发症,如妊娠高血压疾病(HDP)和子痫前期(PE)。证据获取:对2014年至2024年间发表的研究进行了回顾和比较。证据综合:结果表明,与AC相比,NC和mNC方案与更高的CPR和LBR相关。另一方面,AC与HDP和PE风险增加有关,可能是由于缺乏功能性黄体(CL),这在妊娠早期支持中起着至关重要的作用。结论:CL的存在似乎是减少产科并发症的关键,使NC和mNC更好的选择。未来的研究需要完善FET方案,重点关注个性化的子宫内膜准备方法,以优化妊娠结局和孕产妇健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frozen embryo-transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation.

Introduction: Frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) has become a widely adopted method in assisted reproductive technology (ART), thanks to the advancements in vitrification techniques. FET now accounts for a significant proportion of ART cycles, but there is still no clear consensus on the optimal protocol for endometrial preparation. This review aims to evaluate the reproductive outcomes of three commonly used FET protocols: natural cycle (NC), modified natural cycle (mNC), and artificial cycle (AC), with a focus on implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates (CPR), live birth rates (LBR), and obstetric complications such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and preeclampsia (PE).

Evidence acquisition: Studies published between 2014 and 2024 were reviewed and compared across these protocols.

Evidence synthesis: The results show that NC and mNC protocols are associated with higher CPR and LBR compared to AC. AC, on the other hand, is linked to an increased risk of HDP and PE, likely due to the absence of a functional corpus luteum (CL), which plays a vital role in early pregnancy support.

Conclusions: The presence of a CL appears to be crucial for minimizing obstetric complications, making NC and mNC preferable options. Future research is needed to refine FET protocols, focusing on personalized approaches to endometrial preparation that optimize both pregnancy outcomes and maternal health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信