澳大利亚护理背景下精神建构的比较。

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
Katherine Louise Cooper, Kathleen Dixon, Esther Chang, Lauretta Luck
{"title":"澳大利亚护理背景下精神建构的比较。","authors":"Katherine Louise Cooper, Kathleen Dixon, Esther Chang, Lauretta Luck","doi":"10.1177/08980101251336323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose of study:</b> The purpose of this study was to explore whether the professional construction of spirituality resonates with the experience and understanding of registered nurses (RNs). <b>Design of study:</b> Fairclough's critical discourse analysis approach. <b>Methods used:</b> Participants comprised three RN Standards for Practice research and development team members and 20 RNs working in hospitals in Australia. Data analysis was conducted through the application of Schneider's ten work steps. <b>Findings:</b> Holistic discourse was found to be a common discourse among both groups of participants. Other discourses which the two groups of participants drew from in their constructions of spirituality were mostly unique to each group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings have implications for spiritual care practice in the context of holistic nursing, notably in nursing practice standards and nursing education.</p>","PeriodicalId":51615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"8980101251336323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Constructions of Spirituality in an Australian Nursing Context.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Louise Cooper, Kathleen Dixon, Esther Chang, Lauretta Luck\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08980101251336323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose of study:</b> The purpose of this study was to explore whether the professional construction of spirituality resonates with the experience and understanding of registered nurses (RNs). <b>Design of study:</b> Fairclough's critical discourse analysis approach. <b>Methods used:</b> Participants comprised three RN Standards for Practice research and development team members and 20 RNs working in hospitals in Australia. Data analysis was conducted through the application of Schneider's ten work steps. <b>Findings:</b> Holistic discourse was found to be a common discourse among both groups of participants. Other discourses which the two groups of participants drew from in their constructions of spirituality were mostly unique to each group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings have implications for spiritual care practice in the context of holistic nursing, notably in nursing practice standards and nursing education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Holistic Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8980101251336323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Holistic Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101251336323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101251336323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:本研究的目的是探讨灵性专业建设是否与注册护士的经验和理解产生共鸣。研究设计:费尔克劳的批评话语分析方法。采用的方法:参与者包括三名注册护士实践标准研发团队成员和20名在澳大利亚医院工作的注册护士。数据分析通过施耐德的十个工作步骤的应用。研究发现:整体话语是两组参与者的共同话语。两组参与者在他们的灵性建构中汲取的其他话语对每组来说都是独特的。结论:研究结果对整体护理背景下的精神护理实践,特别是护理实践标准和护理教育具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Constructions of Spirituality in an Australian Nursing Context.

Purpose of study: The purpose of this study was to explore whether the professional construction of spirituality resonates with the experience and understanding of registered nurses (RNs). Design of study: Fairclough's critical discourse analysis approach. Methods used: Participants comprised three RN Standards for Practice research and development team members and 20 RNs working in hospitals in Australia. Data analysis was conducted through the application of Schneider's ten work steps. Findings: Holistic discourse was found to be a common discourse among both groups of participants. Other discourses which the two groups of participants drew from in their constructions of spirituality were mostly unique to each group. Conclusions: The findings have implications for spiritual care practice in the context of holistic nursing, notably in nursing practice standards and nursing education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Manuscripts are solicited that deal with the processes of knowledge development and application including research, concept analysis and theory development, practical applications of research and theory, clinical case studies and analysis, practice applications in general, educational approaches and evaluation, and aesthetic expressions of holistic knowledge. While the journal seeks to support work grounded in evidence, the editorial philosophy suggests that there are many diverse sources of “evidence” beyond the realm of what is called “empirical” and that many methods are appropriate for discovering evidence and generating knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信