在老年人中使用电子握力计和加速度计的短肌肉功能电池的框架。

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ryan McGrath, Grant R Tomkinson, Sarah Andrew, Joshua Batesole, Chloe Carling, Bryan K Christensen, Samantha FitzSimmons, Halli Heimbuch, Tyler Hoang, Donald Jurivich, Jacob Kieser, Kelly Knoll, Peyton Lahr, Matthew Langford, Michaela Mastrud, Megan Orr, Yeong Rhee, Kyle J Hackney
{"title":"在老年人中使用电子握力计和加速度计的短肌肉功能电池的框架。","authors":"Ryan McGrath, Grant R Tomkinson, Sarah Andrew, Joshua Batesole, Chloe Carling, Bryan K Christensen, Samantha FitzSimmons, Halli Heimbuch, Tyler Hoang, Donald Jurivich, Jacob Kieser, Kelly Knoll, Peyton Lahr, Matthew Langford, Michaela Mastrud, Megan Orr, Yeong Rhee, Kyle J Hackney","doi":"10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic handgrip dynamometry and accelerometry enables novel opportunities to collect additional attributes of muscle function beyond just maximal strength, but some muscle function attributes may already be related, which may warrant discerning these attributes into a short muscle function battery (SMFB).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to determine the multivariate relationships between maximal strength, asymmetry, submaximal control, rate of force development, bimanual coordination, fatigability, and contractile steadiness in older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional design was used for this investigation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The analytic sample included 121 generally healthy older adults aged 70.7 ± 4.7 years.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Electronic handgrip dynamometry and accelerometry measured strength, asymmetry, submaximal control, rate of force development, bimanual coordination, fatigability, and contractile steadiness. The handgrip variables were standardized before they were included in a factor analysis. Factors with eigenvalues >1.0 were kept. Items within a factor with a loading |>0.30| were similarly retained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 3 factors retained with eigenvalues of 1.88, 1.56, and 1.10. The first factor (functional strength), which explained 39.9 % of the variance, included strength, submaximal control, and rate of force development. Factor 2 (lateral function), which explained 35.8 % of the variance, included asymmetry and bimanual coordination. The third factor (muscle endurance), which explained 24.3 % of the variance, included fatigability and contractile steadiness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest the surfacing of themes in the additional muscle function measures, thereby providing framework for a SMFB. More research is needed for electronic handgrip dynamometry and accelerometry derived muscle function on health before consideration of implementation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"14 3","pages":"100045"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framework for a short muscle function battery using electronic handgrip dynamometry and accelerometry in older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan McGrath, Grant R Tomkinson, Sarah Andrew, Joshua Batesole, Chloe Carling, Bryan K Christensen, Samantha FitzSimmons, Halli Heimbuch, Tyler Hoang, Donald Jurivich, Jacob Kieser, Kelly Knoll, Peyton Lahr, Matthew Langford, Michaela Mastrud, Megan Orr, Yeong Rhee, Kyle J Hackney\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic handgrip dynamometry and accelerometry enables novel opportunities to collect additional attributes of muscle function beyond just maximal strength, but some muscle function attributes may already be related, which may warrant discerning these attributes into a short muscle function battery (SMFB).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to determine the multivariate relationships between maximal strength, asymmetry, submaximal control, rate of force development, bimanual coordination, fatigability, and contractile steadiness in older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional design was used for this investigation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The analytic sample included 121 generally healthy older adults aged 70.7 ± 4.7 years.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Electronic handgrip dynamometry and accelerometry measured strength, asymmetry, submaximal control, rate of force development, bimanual coordination, fatigability, and contractile steadiness. The handgrip variables were standardized before they were included in a factor analysis. Factors with eigenvalues >1.0 were kept. Items within a factor with a loading |>0.30| were similarly retained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 3 factors retained with eigenvalues of 1.88, 1.56, and 1.10. The first factor (functional strength), which explained 39.9 % of the variance, included strength, submaximal control, and rate of force development. Factor 2 (lateral function), which explained 35.8 % of the variance, included asymmetry and bimanual coordination. The third factor (muscle endurance), which explained 24.3 % of the variance, included fatigability and contractile steadiness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest the surfacing of themes in the additional muscle function measures, thereby providing framework for a SMFB. More research is needed for electronic handgrip dynamometry and accelerometry derived muscle function on health before consideration of implementation in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"100045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:电子握力测量和加速度测量为收集肌肉功能的额外属性提供了新的机会,而不仅仅是最大力量,但一些肌肉功能属性可能已经相关,这可能需要将这些属性识别为短肌肉功能电池(SMFB)。目的:我们试图确定老年人最大力量、不对称、次最大控制、力量发展速度、双手协调、疲劳和收缩稳定性之间的多变量关系。设计:本研究采用横断面设计。设置:实验室。参与者:分析样本包括121名年龄为70.7±4.7岁的一般健康老年人。测量:电子握力测定仪和加速度测定仪测量强度、不对称、次最大控制、力发展速度、双手协调、疲劳性和收缩稳定性。握力变量在被纳入因子分析之前是标准化的。特征值为>1.0的因子保留。负载为|>0.30|的因子内的项同样被保留。结果:保留因子3个,特征值分别为1.88、1.56、1.10。第一个因素(功能强度)解释了39.9%的方差,包括力量、次最大控制和力量发展速度。因素2(侧功能)解释了35.8%的方差,包括不对称和双手协调。第三个因素(肌肉耐力),解释了24.3%的差异,包括疲劳和收缩稳定性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在额外的肌肉功能测量中出现了主题,从而为SMFB提供了框架。在考虑应用于临床之前,需要对电子握力测量和加速度测量得出的肌肉功能对健康的影响进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Framework for a short muscle function battery using electronic handgrip dynamometry and accelerometry in older adults.

Background: Electronic handgrip dynamometry and accelerometry enables novel opportunities to collect additional attributes of muscle function beyond just maximal strength, but some muscle function attributes may already be related, which may warrant discerning these attributes into a short muscle function battery (SMFB).

Objectives: We sought to determine the multivariate relationships between maximal strength, asymmetry, submaximal control, rate of force development, bimanual coordination, fatigability, and contractile steadiness in older adults.

Design: A cross-sectional design was used for this investigation.

Setting: Laboratory.

Participants: The analytic sample included 121 generally healthy older adults aged 70.7 ± 4.7 years.

Measurements: Electronic handgrip dynamometry and accelerometry measured strength, asymmetry, submaximal control, rate of force development, bimanual coordination, fatigability, and contractile steadiness. The handgrip variables were standardized before they were included in a factor analysis. Factors with eigenvalues >1.0 were kept. Items within a factor with a loading |>0.30| were similarly retained.

Results: There were 3 factors retained with eigenvalues of 1.88, 1.56, and 1.10. The first factor (functional strength), which explained 39.9 % of the variance, included strength, submaximal control, and rate of force development. Factor 2 (lateral function), which explained 35.8 % of the variance, included asymmetry and bimanual coordination. The third factor (muscle endurance), which explained 24.3 % of the variance, included fatigability and contractile steadiness.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest the surfacing of themes in the additional muscle function measures, thereby providing framework for a SMFB. More research is needed for electronic handgrip dynamometry and accelerometry derived muscle function on health before consideration of implementation in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信