药物洗脱可吸收冠状动脉支架:最新进展综述。

Lowie Vanoverbeke, Johan Bennett
{"title":"药物洗脱可吸收冠状动脉支架:最新进展综述。","authors":"Lowie Vanoverbeke, Johan Bennett","doi":"10.1080/17425247.2025.2495043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Device-related persistent adverse events with current DES-use have refocused the attention on a 'leave-nothing-behind' philosophy, in which it is hypothesized that treating coronary stenosis without permanently caging the vessel with a metallic implant would lead to superior clinical outcomes. One of these uncaging technologies is bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this article, we describe the technical specifications and clinical data of currently available BRS devices.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Newer BRS devices have thinner struts and more biocompatible scaffold backbones (either polymer-based or metal-based), resulting in improved radial strength, faster resorption times, and more antithrombogenic properties (e.g. magnesium-based scaffolds). Results of BRS in the treatment of simple coronary artery disease demonstrate favorable clinical efficacy and safety outcome data. It is probable that over the next 5 years more fourth-generation devices with ever-increasing biocompatibility and safety profiles will be investigated and released commercially, resulting in a much more prominent role for BRS, especially in the treatment of simple coronary artery disease in younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94004,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug-eluting resorbable coronary scaffolds: a review of recent advances.\",\"authors\":\"Lowie Vanoverbeke, Johan Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425247.2025.2495043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Device-related persistent adverse events with current DES-use have refocused the attention on a 'leave-nothing-behind' philosophy, in which it is hypothesized that treating coronary stenosis without permanently caging the vessel with a metallic implant would lead to superior clinical outcomes. One of these uncaging technologies is bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this article, we describe the technical specifications and clinical data of currently available BRS devices.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Newer BRS devices have thinner struts and more biocompatible scaffold backbones (either polymer-based or metal-based), resulting in improved radial strength, faster resorption times, and more antithrombogenic properties (e.g. magnesium-based scaffolds). Results of BRS in the treatment of simple coronary artery disease demonstrate favorable clinical efficacy and safety outcome data. It is probable that over the next 5 years more fourth-generation devices with ever-increasing biocompatibility and safety profiles will be investigated and released commercially, resulting in a much more prominent role for BRS, especially in the treatment of simple coronary artery disease in younger patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert opinion on drug delivery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert opinion on drug delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2025.2495043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2025.2495043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前使用des的器械相关的持续不良事件重新将注意力集中在“不留下任何东西”的理念上,其中假设治疗冠状动脉狭窄而不使用金属植入物永久固定血管将导致更好的临床结果。其中一种脱壳技术是生物可吸收支架(BRS)。涉及领域:在本文中,我们描述了目前可用的BRS设备的技术规格和临床数据。专家意见:较新的BRS设备具有更薄的支柱和更生物相容性的支架骨架(聚合物基或金属基),从而提高了径向强度,更快的吸收时间和更多的抗血栓性特性(例如镁基支架)。BRS治疗单纯性冠状动脉疾病的结果显示了良好的临床疗效和安全性结局数据。在接下来的5年里,可能会有更多生物相容性和安全性不断提高的第四代设备被研究并商业化发布,从而使BRS发挥更突出的作用,特别是在治疗年轻患者的单纯性冠状动脉疾病方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drug-eluting resorbable coronary scaffolds: a review of recent advances.

Introduction: Device-related persistent adverse events with current DES-use have refocused the attention on a 'leave-nothing-behind' philosophy, in which it is hypothesized that treating coronary stenosis without permanently caging the vessel with a metallic implant would lead to superior clinical outcomes. One of these uncaging technologies is bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS).

Areas covered: In this article, we describe the technical specifications and clinical data of currently available BRS devices.

Expert opinion: Newer BRS devices have thinner struts and more biocompatible scaffold backbones (either polymer-based or metal-based), resulting in improved radial strength, faster resorption times, and more antithrombogenic properties (e.g. magnesium-based scaffolds). Results of BRS in the treatment of simple coronary artery disease demonstrate favorable clinical efficacy and safety outcome data. It is probable that over the next 5 years more fourth-generation devices with ever-increasing biocompatibility and safety profiles will be investigated and released commercially, resulting in a much more prominent role for BRS, especially in the treatment of simple coronary artery disease in younger patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信