改良隧道技术对下前龈退缩牙根覆盖的长期评估:一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI:10.5051/jpis.2402660133
Sungtae Kim, Hee-Seung Han, Hyunkyung Kim, Hyunjae Kim, Yang-Jo Seol, Young-Dan Cho
{"title":"改良隧道技术对下前龈退缩牙根覆盖的长期评估:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Sungtae Kim, Hee-Seung Han, Hyunkyung Kim, Hyunjae Kim, Yang-Jo Seol, Young-Dan Cho","doi":"10.5051/jpis.2402660133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Root coverage (RC) procedures require long-term evaluation. This study assessed the clinical validity and long-term stability of a modified tunneling technique for lower anterior gingival recession (GR) using a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and a volume-stable collagen matrix.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Across 39 patients, 66 mandibular incisors with ≥1.0 mm of GR were examined before and after RC surgery. Clinical photographs documenting the results of RC were taken at baseline (T₀) and the most recent follow-up visit (T<i><sub>l</sub></i>). Impressions were obtained either at baseline (T₀) or 3 weeks later (T₃). The recession depth, Miller classification, and rates of RC and complete root coverage (CRC) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study analyzed 66 GR sites across 39 patients, with an average follow-up period of 41.3 months. Overall, the mean RC achieved was 86.2%±15.7%. Among single recessions, the RC was 85.2%±25.6% for Miller class I, 91.5%±10.4% for class II, and 79.2%±18.3% for class III. Regarding multiple recessions, the RC was 85.1%±16.2% for Miller class I, 87.0%±12.5% for class II, and 89.8%±16.0% for class III. By Miller classification, the RC was 85.1%±16.8% for class I, 88.7%±11.6% for class II, and 85.8%±17.3% for class III. Furthermore, the RC varied by follow-up duration: 72.5%±15.1% at 12 months, 90.1%±12.6% at 25-36 months, 89.0%±16.7% at 37-48 months, 91.10%±9.88% at 49-60 months, and 97.6±4.79% for longer than 61 months, with 77.8% of the last group achieving CRC. RC also differed based on the initial recession depth, at 88.0%±16.8% for 1-3 mm, 83.1%±14.1% for 3-6 mm, and 80.2%±5.04% for depths exceeding 6 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A modified tunneling technique, utilizing SCTG and a volume-stable collagen matrix, appears to represent a reliable option for the long-term management of GR in the lower anterior region, even in cases involving multiple Miller class III GRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","volume":"55 2","pages":"115-126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term assessment of a modified tunneling technique for root coverage in lower anterior gingival recession: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Sungtae Kim, Hee-Seung Han, Hyunkyung Kim, Hyunjae Kim, Yang-Jo Seol, Young-Dan Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.5051/jpis.2402660133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Root coverage (RC) procedures require long-term evaluation. This study assessed the clinical validity and long-term stability of a modified tunneling technique for lower anterior gingival recession (GR) using a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and a volume-stable collagen matrix.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Across 39 patients, 66 mandibular incisors with ≥1.0 mm of GR were examined before and after RC surgery. Clinical photographs documenting the results of RC were taken at baseline (T₀) and the most recent follow-up visit (T<i><sub>l</sub></i>). Impressions were obtained either at baseline (T₀) or 3 weeks later (T₃). The recession depth, Miller classification, and rates of RC and complete root coverage (CRC) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study analyzed 66 GR sites across 39 patients, with an average follow-up period of 41.3 months. Overall, the mean RC achieved was 86.2%±15.7%. Among single recessions, the RC was 85.2%±25.6% for Miller class I, 91.5%±10.4% for class II, and 79.2%±18.3% for class III. Regarding multiple recessions, the RC was 85.1%±16.2% for Miller class I, 87.0%±12.5% for class II, and 89.8%±16.0% for class III. By Miller classification, the RC was 85.1%±16.8% for class I, 88.7%±11.6% for class II, and 85.8%±17.3% for class III. Furthermore, the RC varied by follow-up duration: 72.5%±15.1% at 12 months, 90.1%±12.6% at 25-36 months, 89.0%±16.7% at 37-48 months, 91.10%±9.88% at 49-60 months, and 97.6±4.79% for longer than 61 months, with 77.8% of the last group achieving CRC. RC also differed based on the initial recession depth, at 88.0%±16.8% for 1-3 mm, 83.1%±14.1% for 3-6 mm, and 80.2%±5.04% for depths exceeding 6 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A modified tunneling technique, utilizing SCTG and a volume-stable collagen matrix, appears to represent a reliable option for the long-term management of GR in the lower anterior region, even in cases involving multiple Miller class III GRs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"115-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056243/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2402660133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2402660133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根覆盖(RC)手术需要长期评估。本研究评估了使用上皮下结缔组织移植物(SCTG)和体积稳定的胶原基质治疗下前龈退缩(GR)的改良隧道技术的临床有效性和长期稳定性。方法:对39例患者66颗GR≥1.0 mm的下颚切牙在RC手术前后进行检查。记录RC结果的临床照片在基线(T 0)和最近的随访(Tl)拍摄。印象是在基线(T₀)或3周后(T₃)获得的。评估了退化深度、Miller分类、RC和完全根覆盖率(CRC)。结果:本研究分析了39例患者66个GR部位,平均随访时间41.3个月。总体而言,平均RC达到86.2%±15.7%。在单次衰退中,Miller I类的RC为85.2%±25.6%,II类为91.5%±10.4%,III类为79.2%±18.3%。对于多重衰退,Miller类的RC为85.1%±16.2%,类为87.0%±12.5%,类为89.8%±16.0%。根据Miller分类,ⅰ类的RC为85.1%±16.8%,ⅱ类为88.7%±11.6%,ⅲ类为85.8%±17.3%。此外,CRC随随访时间的变化而变化:12个月时为72.5%±15.1%,25-36个月时为90.1%±12.6%,37-48个月时为89.0%±16.7%,49-60个月时为91.10%±9.88%,超过61个月时为97.6±4.79%,最后一组的77.8%达到CRC。根据初始消退深度,RC也有所不同,1-3 mm为88.0%±16.8%,3-6 mm为83.1%±14.1%,深度超过6 mm为80.2%±5.04%。结论:利用SCTG和体积稳定的胶原基质的改良隧道技术,对于下前区GR的长期治疗似乎是可靠的选择,即使涉及多个Miller III级GR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term assessment of a modified tunneling technique for root coverage in lower anterior gingival recession: a retrospective study.

Purpose: Root coverage (RC) procedures require long-term evaluation. This study assessed the clinical validity and long-term stability of a modified tunneling technique for lower anterior gingival recession (GR) using a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and a volume-stable collagen matrix.

Methods: Across 39 patients, 66 mandibular incisors with ≥1.0 mm of GR were examined before and after RC surgery. Clinical photographs documenting the results of RC were taken at baseline (T₀) and the most recent follow-up visit (Tl). Impressions were obtained either at baseline (T₀) or 3 weeks later (T₃). The recession depth, Miller classification, and rates of RC and complete root coverage (CRC) were assessed.

Results: This study analyzed 66 GR sites across 39 patients, with an average follow-up period of 41.3 months. Overall, the mean RC achieved was 86.2%±15.7%. Among single recessions, the RC was 85.2%±25.6% for Miller class I, 91.5%±10.4% for class II, and 79.2%±18.3% for class III. Regarding multiple recessions, the RC was 85.1%±16.2% for Miller class I, 87.0%±12.5% for class II, and 89.8%±16.0% for class III. By Miller classification, the RC was 85.1%±16.8% for class I, 88.7%±11.6% for class II, and 85.8%±17.3% for class III. Furthermore, the RC varied by follow-up duration: 72.5%±15.1% at 12 months, 90.1%±12.6% at 25-36 months, 89.0%±16.7% at 37-48 months, 91.10%±9.88% at 49-60 months, and 97.6±4.79% for longer than 61 months, with 77.8% of the last group achieving CRC. RC also differed based on the initial recession depth, at 88.0%±16.8% for 1-3 mm, 83.1%±14.1% for 3-6 mm, and 80.2%±5.04% for depths exceeding 6 mm.

Conclusions: A modified tunneling technique, utilizing SCTG and a volume-stable collagen matrix, appears to represent a reliable option for the long-term management of GR in the lower anterior region, even in cases involving multiple Miller class III GRs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science (JPIS) is a peer-reviewed and open-access journal providing up-to-date information relevant to professionalism of periodontology and dental implantology. JPIS is dedicated to global and extensive publication which includes evidence-based original articles, and fundamental reviews in order to cover a variety of interests in the field of periodontal as well as implant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信