应用机器学习方法预测上皮性卵巢癌术后Clavien Dindo分级≥III级并发症

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Aysun Alci, Fatih Ikiz, Necim Yalcin, Mustafa Gokkaya, Gulsum Ekin Sari, Isin Ureyen, Tayfun Toptas
{"title":"应用机器学习方法预测上皮性卵巢癌术后Clavien Dindo分级≥III级并发症","authors":"Aysun Alci, Fatih Ikiz, Necim Yalcin, Mustafa Gokkaya, Gulsum Ekin Sari, Isin Ureyen, Tayfun Toptas","doi":"10.3390/medicina61040695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives:</i> Ovarian cancer surgery requires multiple radical resections with a high risk of complications. The aim of this single-centre, retrospective study was to determine the best method for predicting Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications using machine learning techniques. <i>Material and Methods</i>: The study included 179 patients who underwent surgery at the gynaecological oncology department of Antalya Training and Research Hospital between January 2015 and December 2020. The data were randomly split into training set n = 134 (75%) and test set n = 45 (25%). We used 49 predictors to develop the best algorithm. Mean absolute error, root mean squared error, correlation coefficients, Mathew's correlation coefficient, and F1 score were used to determine the best performing algorithm. Cohens' kappa value was evaluated to analyse the consistency of the model with real data. The relationship between these predicted values and the actual values were then summarised using a confusion matrix. True positive (TP) rate, False positive (FP) rate, precision, recall, and Area under the curve (AUC) values were evaluated to demonstrate clinical usability and classification skills. <i>Results</i>: 139 patients (77.65%) had no morbidity or grade I-II CDC morbidity, while 40 patients (22.35%) had grade III or higher CDC morbidity. BayesNet was found to be the most effective prediction model. No dominant parameter was observed in the Bayesian net importance matrix plot. The true positive (TP) rate was 76%, false positive (FP) rate was 15.6%, recall rate (sensitivity) was 76.9%, and overall accuracy was 82.2% A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to estimate CDC grade ≥ III. AUC was 0.863 with a statistical significance of <i>p</i> < 0.001, indicating a high degree of accuracy. <i>Conclusions</i>: The Bayesian network model achieved the highest accuracy compared to all other models in predicting CDC Grade ≥ III complications following epithelial ovarian cancer surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12028651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Clavien Dindo Classification ≥ Grade III Complications After Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery Using Machine Learning Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Aysun Alci, Fatih Ikiz, Necim Yalcin, Mustafa Gokkaya, Gulsum Ekin Sari, Isin Ureyen, Tayfun Toptas\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medicina61040695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives:</i> Ovarian cancer surgery requires multiple radical resections with a high risk of complications. The aim of this single-centre, retrospective study was to determine the best method for predicting Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications using machine learning techniques. <i>Material and Methods</i>: The study included 179 patients who underwent surgery at the gynaecological oncology department of Antalya Training and Research Hospital between January 2015 and December 2020. The data were randomly split into training set n = 134 (75%) and test set n = 45 (25%). We used 49 predictors to develop the best algorithm. Mean absolute error, root mean squared error, correlation coefficients, Mathew's correlation coefficient, and F1 score were used to determine the best performing algorithm. Cohens' kappa value was evaluated to analyse the consistency of the model with real data. The relationship between these predicted values and the actual values were then summarised using a confusion matrix. True positive (TP) rate, False positive (FP) rate, precision, recall, and Area under the curve (AUC) values were evaluated to demonstrate clinical usability and classification skills. <i>Results</i>: 139 patients (77.65%) had no morbidity or grade I-II CDC morbidity, while 40 patients (22.35%) had grade III or higher CDC morbidity. BayesNet was found to be the most effective prediction model. No dominant parameter was observed in the Bayesian net importance matrix plot. The true positive (TP) rate was 76%, false positive (FP) rate was 15.6%, recall rate (sensitivity) was 76.9%, and overall accuracy was 82.2% A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to estimate CDC grade ≥ III. AUC was 0.863 with a statistical significance of <i>p</i> < 0.001, indicating a high degree of accuracy. <i>Conclusions</i>: The Bayesian network model achieved the highest accuracy compared to all other models in predicting CDC Grade ≥ III complications following epithelial ovarian cancer surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12028651/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040695\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:卵巢癌手术需要多次根治性切除,并发症风险高。这项单中心回顾性研究的目的是确定使用机器学习技术预测Clavien-Dindo≥III级并发症的最佳方法。材料与方法:该研究纳入了2015年1月至2020年12月期间在安塔利亚培训与研究医院妇科肿瘤科接受手术的179例患者。数据随机分为训练集n = 134(75%)和测试集n = 45(25%)。我们使用了49个预测因子来开发最佳算法。采用平均绝对误差、均方根误差、相关系数、马修相关系数和F1评分来确定最佳算法。利用Cohens’kappa值分析模型与实际数据的一致性。这些预测值和实际值之间的关系,然后使用混淆矩阵进行总结。评估真阳性(TP)率、假阳性(FP)率、准确率、召回率和曲线下面积(AUC)值,以证明临床可用性和分类技能。结果:139例(77.65%)患者无发病或CDC I-II级发病,40例(22.35%)患者CDC III级及以上发病。BayesNet是最有效的预测模型。在贝叶斯网络重要性矩阵图中未观察到主导参数。真阳性(TP)率为76%,假阳性(FP)率为15.6%,召回率(敏感性)为76.9%,总体准确率为82.2%。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估疾病分级≥III级。AUC为0.863,p < 0.001,具有统计学意义,准确度较高。结论:与所有其他模型相比,贝叶斯网络模型在预测上皮性卵巢癌手术后CDC≥III级并发症方面具有最高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of Clavien Dindo Classification ≥ Grade III Complications After Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery Using Machine Learning Methods.

Background and Objectives: Ovarian cancer surgery requires multiple radical resections with a high risk of complications. The aim of this single-centre, retrospective study was to determine the best method for predicting Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications using machine learning techniques. Material and Methods: The study included 179 patients who underwent surgery at the gynaecological oncology department of Antalya Training and Research Hospital between January 2015 and December 2020. The data were randomly split into training set n = 134 (75%) and test set n = 45 (25%). We used 49 predictors to develop the best algorithm. Mean absolute error, root mean squared error, correlation coefficients, Mathew's correlation coefficient, and F1 score were used to determine the best performing algorithm. Cohens' kappa value was evaluated to analyse the consistency of the model with real data. The relationship between these predicted values and the actual values were then summarised using a confusion matrix. True positive (TP) rate, False positive (FP) rate, precision, recall, and Area under the curve (AUC) values were evaluated to demonstrate clinical usability and classification skills. Results: 139 patients (77.65%) had no morbidity or grade I-II CDC morbidity, while 40 patients (22.35%) had grade III or higher CDC morbidity. BayesNet was found to be the most effective prediction model. No dominant parameter was observed in the Bayesian net importance matrix plot. The true positive (TP) rate was 76%, false positive (FP) rate was 15.6%, recall rate (sensitivity) was 76.9%, and overall accuracy was 82.2% A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to estimate CDC grade ≥ III. AUC was 0.863 with a statistical significance of p < 0.001, indicating a high degree of accuracy. Conclusions: The Bayesian network model achieved the highest accuracy compared to all other models in predicting CDC Grade ≥ III complications following epithelial ovarian cancer surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信