导航人工智能辅助学生作业的前沿:挑战、技能和解决方案。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1152/advan.00253.2024
Suzanne Estaphan, David Kramer, Harry J Witchel
{"title":"导航人工智能辅助学生作业的前沿:挑战、技能和解决方案。","authors":"Suzanne Estaphan, David Kramer, Harry J Witchel","doi":"10.1152/advan.00253.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming educational practices, particularly in assessment. While AI may support the students in idea generation and summarization of source materials, it also introduces challenges related to content validity, academic integrity, and the development of critical thinking skills. Educators need strategies to navigate these complexities and maintain rigorous, ethical assessments that promote higher order cognitive skills. This article provides practical guidance for educators on designing take-home assessments (e.g. research-based assignments) in the AI era. This guidance was developed through a collaborative, consensus-driven process involving a consortium of three educators with diverse academic backgrounds, career stages, and perspectives on AI in education. Members, holding experience in higher education across the United Kingdom, United States of America, Australia, and Middle East and North Africa regions, brought varied insights into AI's role in education. The team engaged in an iterative process of refining recommendations through biweekly virtual meetings and offline discussions. Four key recommendations are presented <i>1</i>) codeveloping AI literacy among students and educators, <i>2</i>) designing assessments that prioritize process over output, <i>3</i>) validating learning through AI-free assessments, and <i>4</i>) preparing students for AI-enhanced workplaces by developing AI communication skills and promoting human-AI collaboration. These strategies emphasize ethical AI use, personalized feedback, and creativity. By adopting these approaches, educators can balance the benefits and risks of AI in assessments, fostering authentic learning while preparing students for the challenges of an AI-driven world.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This paper presents a framework to effectively design take-home assessments in the generative artificial intelligence (AI) era with four key recommendations to navigate the challenges and opportunities posed by generative AI. From codeveloping AI literacy to fostering human-AI collaboration, the strategies empower educators to promote authentic learning, critical thinking, and ethical AI use. Adaptable to various contexts, these insights help prepare students for an AI-driven future while maintaining academic rigor and integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"633-639"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the frontier of AI-assisted student assignments: challenges, skills, and solutions.\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne Estaphan, David Kramer, Harry J Witchel\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00253.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming educational practices, particularly in assessment. While AI may support the students in idea generation and summarization of source materials, it also introduces challenges related to content validity, academic integrity, and the development of critical thinking skills. Educators need strategies to navigate these complexities and maintain rigorous, ethical assessments that promote higher order cognitive skills. This article provides practical guidance for educators on designing take-home assessments (e.g. research-based assignments) in the AI era. This guidance was developed through a collaborative, consensus-driven process involving a consortium of three educators with diverse academic backgrounds, career stages, and perspectives on AI in education. Members, holding experience in higher education across the United Kingdom, United States of America, Australia, and Middle East and North Africa regions, brought varied insights into AI's role in education. The team engaged in an iterative process of refining recommendations through biweekly virtual meetings and offline discussions. Four key recommendations are presented <i>1</i>) codeveloping AI literacy among students and educators, <i>2</i>) designing assessments that prioritize process over output, <i>3</i>) validating learning through AI-free assessments, and <i>4</i>) preparing students for AI-enhanced workplaces by developing AI communication skills and promoting human-AI collaboration. These strategies emphasize ethical AI use, personalized feedback, and creativity. By adopting these approaches, educators can balance the benefits and risks of AI in assessments, fostering authentic learning while preparing students for the challenges of an AI-driven world.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This paper presents a framework to effectively design take-home assessments in the generative artificial intelligence (AI) era with four key recommendations to navigate the challenges and opportunities posed by generative AI. From codeveloping AI literacy to fostering human-AI collaboration, the strategies empower educators to promote authentic learning, critical thinking, and ethical AI use. Adaptable to various contexts, these insights help prepare students for an AI-driven future while maintaining academic rigor and integrity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"633-639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00253.2024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00253.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)的兴起正在改变教育实践,特别是在评估方面。虽然人工智能可以帮助学生产生想法和总结原始材料,但它也带来了与内容有效性、学术完整性和批判性思维技能发展相关的挑战。教育工作者需要策略来应对这些复杂性,并保持严格的道德评估,以促进更高层次的认知技能。这份手稿为教育工作者在人工智能时代设计带回家的评估(例如基于研究的作业)提供了实用指导。该指南是通过协作、共识驱动的过程制定的,该过程涉及由三位具有不同学术背景、职业阶段和教育人工智能观点的教育工作者组成的联盟。成员们在英国(UK)、美国(USA)、澳大利亚以及中东和北非(MENA)地区拥有高等教育经验,他们对人工智能在教育中的作用提出了不同的见解。该团队通过每两周一次的虚拟会议和离线讨论,参与了改进建议的迭代过程。提出了四项关键建议:(1)在学生和教育工作者中共同培养人工智能素养;(2)设计优先考虑过程而不是产出的评估;(3)通过无人工智能评估来验证学习;(4)通过培养人工智能沟通技巧和促进人类与人工智能的协作,为学生为人工智能增强的工作场所做好准备。这些策略强调合乎道德的人工智能使用、个性化反馈和创造力。通过采用这些方法,教育工作者可以在评估中平衡人工智能的好处和风险,促进真实的学习,同时为学生应对人工智能驱动世界的挑战做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating the frontier of AI-assisted student assignments: challenges, skills, and solutions.

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming educational practices, particularly in assessment. While AI may support the students in idea generation and summarization of source materials, it also introduces challenges related to content validity, academic integrity, and the development of critical thinking skills. Educators need strategies to navigate these complexities and maintain rigorous, ethical assessments that promote higher order cognitive skills. This article provides practical guidance for educators on designing take-home assessments (e.g. research-based assignments) in the AI era. This guidance was developed through a collaborative, consensus-driven process involving a consortium of three educators with diverse academic backgrounds, career stages, and perspectives on AI in education. Members, holding experience in higher education across the United Kingdom, United States of America, Australia, and Middle East and North Africa regions, brought varied insights into AI's role in education. The team engaged in an iterative process of refining recommendations through biweekly virtual meetings and offline discussions. Four key recommendations are presented 1) codeveloping AI literacy among students and educators, 2) designing assessments that prioritize process over output, 3) validating learning through AI-free assessments, and 4) preparing students for AI-enhanced workplaces by developing AI communication skills and promoting human-AI collaboration. These strategies emphasize ethical AI use, personalized feedback, and creativity. By adopting these approaches, educators can balance the benefits and risks of AI in assessments, fostering authentic learning while preparing students for the challenges of an AI-driven world.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This paper presents a framework to effectively design take-home assessments in the generative artificial intelligence (AI) era with four key recommendations to navigate the challenges and opportunities posed by generative AI. From codeveloping AI literacy to fostering human-AI collaboration, the strategies empower educators to promote authentic learning, critical thinking, and ethical AI use. Adaptable to various contexts, these insights help prepare students for an AI-driven future while maintaining academic rigor and integrity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信