Liam Costello, Conor Toale, Farah Mohammed, Paul F Ridgway
{"title":"横断成像是否削弱了手术交接对实习生评估的效用?","authors":"Liam Costello, Conor Toale, Farah Mohammed, Paul F Ridgway","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2025.04.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Workplace-based assessments have been widely adopted by surgical training bodies to assess surgical trainees. In this study, we used a handover tool to assess the diagnostic accuracy of admitting surgical trainees, and whether this was impacted by cross-sectional imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Details of 979 patients over a 7-month period were reviewed. The primary outcome was concordance between the admitting and discharge diagnoses, as recorded using the surgical handover tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concordance between the admitting and discharge diagnoses was 81.4 %. A positive association was found between diagnostic accuracy and pre-referral cross-sectional imaging (r = 0.67). Obtaining a CT scan before handover was significantly associated with higher diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cross-sectional imaging positively affects the diagnostic accuracy of surgical trainees. Given the availability of cross-sectional imaging, this calls into question whether surgical handovers can be used to assess surgical trainees in the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does cross-sectional imaging diminish the utility of surgical handover for trainee assessment?\",\"authors\":\"Liam Costello, Conor Toale, Farah Mohammed, Paul F Ridgway\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surge.2025.04.053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Workplace-based assessments have been widely adopted by surgical training bodies to assess surgical trainees. In this study, we used a handover tool to assess the diagnostic accuracy of admitting surgical trainees, and whether this was impacted by cross-sectional imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Details of 979 patients over a 7-month period were reviewed. The primary outcome was concordance between the admitting and discharge diagnoses, as recorded using the surgical handover tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concordance between the admitting and discharge diagnoses was 81.4 %. A positive association was found between diagnostic accuracy and pre-referral cross-sectional imaging (r = 0.67). Obtaining a CT scan before handover was significantly associated with higher diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cross-sectional imaging positively affects the diagnostic accuracy of surgical trainees. Given the availability of cross-sectional imaging, this calls into question whether surgical handovers can be used to assess surgical trainees in the workplace.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2025.04.053\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2025.04.053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does cross-sectional imaging diminish the utility of surgical handover for trainee assessment?
Introduction: Workplace-based assessments have been widely adopted by surgical training bodies to assess surgical trainees. In this study, we used a handover tool to assess the diagnostic accuracy of admitting surgical trainees, and whether this was impacted by cross-sectional imaging.
Methods: Data was retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Details of 979 patients over a 7-month period were reviewed. The primary outcome was concordance between the admitting and discharge diagnoses, as recorded using the surgical handover tool.
Results: The concordance between the admitting and discharge diagnoses was 81.4 %. A positive association was found between diagnostic accuracy and pre-referral cross-sectional imaging (r = 0.67). Obtaining a CT scan before handover was significantly associated with higher diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Cross-sectional imaging positively affects the diagnostic accuracy of surgical trainees. Given the availability of cross-sectional imaging, this calls into question whether surgical handovers can be used to assess surgical trainees in the workplace.
期刊介绍:
Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field.
Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.