机器人约束Lokomat训练对沙特女性中风患者步态康复的有效性:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-11 DOI:10.1177/10538135251333349
Hayam Mahmoud, Ehab Abd El-Kafy, Mohamed Salaheldien Alayat, Kholood M Shalabi, Anwar Abdelgayed Ebid, Amir Abdel Raouf El Fiky
{"title":"机器人约束Lokomat训练对沙特女性中风患者步态康复的有效性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Hayam Mahmoud, Ehab Abd El-Kafy, Mohamed Salaheldien Alayat, Kholood M Shalabi, Anwar Abdelgayed Ebid, Amir Abdel Raouf El Fiky","doi":"10.1177/10538135251333349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of robot-assisted gait training (Lokomat) combined with conventional physical therapy (CPT) on gait parameters and overall functional outcomes in female patients with stroke.MethodsA total of 40 female patients with stroke were participated in the study. They were randomly allocated into two groups: Robotic-assisted gait training group (RG; n = 20), and received Lokomat training combined with CPT, and the control group (CG; n = 20), received CPT only. CPT included neurophysiological approaches, functional training, balance exercises, and overground walking. Gait parameters (stride length and cadence), muscle strength (Motricity Index), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), gait independence (Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), and lower limb muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were measured before and after 12-weeks of rehabilitation for both groups.ResultsSignificant improvements in post-treatment were observed in all measures across both groups, except for MAS and TUG, as reductions in muscle tone and walking speed were significant only in the RG. Greater significant improvements in all outcome measures were recorded at RG when compared to the CG.ConclusionRobot-assisted gait training with Lokomat, combined with CPT, was more effective than CPT alone in improving gait parameters, mobility, and walking speed in ambulatory post-stroke female patients.Registry: Clinical Trials.gov (NCT05485727).</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"70-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Robotic Constraint Lokomat Training on Gait Rehabilitation in Saudi Females Patients with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hayam Mahmoud, Ehab Abd El-Kafy, Mohamed Salaheldien Alayat, Kholood M Shalabi, Anwar Abdelgayed Ebid, Amir Abdel Raouf El Fiky\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538135251333349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of robot-assisted gait training (Lokomat) combined with conventional physical therapy (CPT) on gait parameters and overall functional outcomes in female patients with stroke.MethodsA total of 40 female patients with stroke were participated in the study. They were randomly allocated into two groups: Robotic-assisted gait training group (RG; n = 20), and received Lokomat training combined with CPT, and the control group (CG; n = 20), received CPT only. CPT included neurophysiological approaches, functional training, balance exercises, and overground walking. Gait parameters (stride length and cadence), muscle strength (Motricity Index), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), gait independence (Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), and lower limb muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were measured before and after 12-weeks of rehabilitation for both groups.ResultsSignificant improvements in post-treatment were observed in all measures across both groups, except for MAS and TUG, as reductions in muscle tone and walking speed were significant only in the RG. Greater significant improvements in all outcome measures were recorded at RG when compared to the CG.ConclusionRobot-assisted gait training with Lokomat, combined with CPT, was more effective than CPT alone in improving gait parameters, mobility, and walking speed in ambulatory post-stroke female patients.Registry: Clinical Trials.gov (NCT05485727).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"70-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251333349\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251333349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价机器人辅助步态训练(Lokomat)联合常规物理治疗(CPT)对女性脑卒中患者步态参数和整体功能结局的影响。方法选取40例女性脑卒中患者作为研究对象。他们被随机分为两组:机器人辅助步态训练组(RG);n = 20),接受Lokomat联合CPT训练,对照组(CG;n = 20),仅接受CPT治疗。CPT包括神经生理学方法、功能训练、平衡练习和地上行走。在康复12周前后分别测量两组患者的步态参数(步幅和步速)、肌肉力量(运动指数)、Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)、步态独立性(Functional Ambulation Category (FAC))和下肢肌张力(Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS))。结果除MAS和TUG外,两组治疗后的所有指标均有显著改善,肌肉张力和步行速度仅在RG中显著降低。与CG相比,RG组在所有结果测量方面都有更显著的改善。结论机器人辅助步态训练与Lokomat联合CPT在改善女性卒中后可走动患者的步态参数、活动能力和步行速度方面比单独CPT更有效。注册:Clinical Trials.gov (NCT05485727)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of Robotic Constraint Lokomat Training on Gait Rehabilitation in Saudi Females Patients with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of robot-assisted gait training (Lokomat) combined with conventional physical therapy (CPT) on gait parameters and overall functional outcomes in female patients with stroke.MethodsA total of 40 female patients with stroke were participated in the study. They were randomly allocated into two groups: Robotic-assisted gait training group (RG; n = 20), and received Lokomat training combined with CPT, and the control group (CG; n = 20), received CPT only. CPT included neurophysiological approaches, functional training, balance exercises, and overground walking. Gait parameters (stride length and cadence), muscle strength (Motricity Index), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), gait independence (Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), and lower limb muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were measured before and after 12-weeks of rehabilitation for both groups.ResultsSignificant improvements in post-treatment were observed in all measures across both groups, except for MAS and TUG, as reductions in muscle tone and walking speed were significant only in the RG. Greater significant improvements in all outcome measures were recorded at RG when compared to the CG.ConclusionRobot-assisted gait training with Lokomat, combined with CPT, was more effective than CPT alone in improving gait parameters, mobility, and walking speed in ambulatory post-stroke female patients.Registry: Clinical Trials.gov (NCT05485727).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信