{"title":"精神疾病病假后重返工作岗位——基于职场整合管理者视角的定性研究。","authors":"Anna Pelizäus, Martina Geipel, Johannes Hamann","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02906-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Increasing numbers of people are unable to work due to mental illness and this is an increasing problem on both a personal and societal level. In Germany, a workplace integration management system (BEM) has been legally required since 2004 to support return to work (RTW). However, its uptake and success, especially regarding mental illnesses, is still unclear. This study was conducted to identify the current state of RTW after episodes of mental illnesses from the perspective of workplace integration managers and explore potential barriers and facilitators that influence the course and outcome of the BEM process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with BEM managers (N = 14) from the greater Munich area were performed and analyzed using Thematic Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In their work, BEM managers tend to find themselves in a field of tension between the personal concerns of returning employees and the employer's business interests. They experience mistrust and lack of openness on the part of the returnees, while employers show little willingness to fully invest in the process. Lack of or incorrect information about BEM and on mental illness seems to promote these disruptive factors, as well as others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Broad education on BEM appears to be a promising means to reduce fear among returnees and to better reach the processes potential. In addition, a more open approach to mental illness could simplify the process for all involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to work after sick leave due to mental illness - a qualitative study on the perspective of workplace integration managers.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Pelizäus, Martina Geipel, Johannes Hamann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00127-025-02906-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Increasing numbers of people are unable to work due to mental illness and this is an increasing problem on both a personal and societal level. In Germany, a workplace integration management system (BEM) has been legally required since 2004 to support return to work (RTW). However, its uptake and success, especially regarding mental illnesses, is still unclear. This study was conducted to identify the current state of RTW after episodes of mental illnesses from the perspective of workplace integration managers and explore potential barriers and facilitators that influence the course and outcome of the BEM process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with BEM managers (N = 14) from the greater Munich area were performed and analyzed using Thematic Analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In their work, BEM managers tend to find themselves in a field of tension between the personal concerns of returning employees and the employer's business interests. They experience mistrust and lack of openness on the part of the returnees, while employers show little willingness to fully invest in the process. Lack of or incorrect information about BEM and on mental illness seems to promote these disruptive factors, as well as others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Broad education on BEM appears to be a promising means to reduce fear among returnees and to better reach the processes potential. In addition, a more open approach to mental illness could simplify the process for all involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02906-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02906-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Return to work after sick leave due to mental illness - a qualitative study on the perspective of workplace integration managers.
Background and aim: Increasing numbers of people are unable to work due to mental illness and this is an increasing problem on both a personal and societal level. In Germany, a workplace integration management system (BEM) has been legally required since 2004 to support return to work (RTW). However, its uptake and success, especially regarding mental illnesses, is still unclear. This study was conducted to identify the current state of RTW after episodes of mental illnesses from the perspective of workplace integration managers and explore potential barriers and facilitators that influence the course and outcome of the BEM process.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews with BEM managers (N = 14) from the greater Munich area were performed and analyzed using Thematic Analysis.
Results: In their work, BEM managers tend to find themselves in a field of tension between the personal concerns of returning employees and the employer's business interests. They experience mistrust and lack of openness on the part of the returnees, while employers show little willingness to fully invest in the process. Lack of or incorrect information about BEM and on mental illness seems to promote these disruptive factors, as well as others.
Conclusion: Broad education on BEM appears to be a promising means to reduce fear among returnees and to better reach the processes potential. In addition, a more open approach to mental illness could simplify the process for all involved.
期刊介绍:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic.
In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation.
Both original work and review articles may be submitted.