家庭医学住院医师项目中基于价值的护理教育:项目主任的CERA研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Maria Syl de la Cruz, Ashley Chou, Deborah Edberg, William T Leach, Catherine Guariglia, Julie T Schultz, Anna Flattau
{"title":"家庭医学住院医师项目中基于价值的护理教育:项目主任的CERA研究。","authors":"Maria Syl de la Cruz, Ashley Chou, Deborah Edberg, William T Leach, Catherine Guariglia, Julie T Schultz, Anna Flattau","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2025.502198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Primary care is shifting to value-based care (VBC) payment models, which measure and prioritize quality outcomes and cost efficiency. These models include functions such as interdisciplinary teamwork, proactive panel management, and measurement of total cost of care, with the specific aim of improving quality and reducing health care costs. Graduating residents will require training in the key principles of VBC to succeed in many primary care settings. This research study explored current training practices in VBC within family medicine residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance study of family medicine program directors assessed the current state of VBC education. The survey questions assessed whether programs had a formal VBC curriculum, what elements of VBC are taught and how, and the present barriers and facilitators to VBC education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate for the survey was 45.39% (320/705). Most respondents (92.2%) agreed that teaching VBC within their residency curriculum was important, but only 26.9% of programs have established a formal VBC curriculum. The most frequently taught element is the \"evaluation and management of quality outcomes\" (80.9%), and VBC is mostly taught through didactics (79.7%). The most frequently reported barrier to teaching VBC was the lack of time within the curriculum and/or competing priorities (37.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residency programs in primary care specialties would benefit from a formal VBC curriculum appropriate for graduate medical education. This curriculum should include assessment tools for residents that include objective measures for VBC skills and training.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":"57 4","pages":"298-302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value-Based Care Education in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Study of Program Directors.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Syl de la Cruz, Ashley Chou, Deborah Edberg, William T Leach, Catherine Guariglia, Julie T Schultz, Anna Flattau\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/FamMed.2025.502198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Primary care is shifting to value-based care (VBC) payment models, which measure and prioritize quality outcomes and cost efficiency. These models include functions such as interdisciplinary teamwork, proactive panel management, and measurement of total cost of care, with the specific aim of improving quality and reducing health care costs. Graduating residents will require training in the key principles of VBC to succeed in many primary care settings. This research study explored current training practices in VBC within family medicine residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance study of family medicine program directors assessed the current state of VBC education. The survey questions assessed whether programs had a formal VBC curriculum, what elements of VBC are taught and how, and the present barriers and facilitators to VBC education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate for the survey was 45.39% (320/705). Most respondents (92.2%) agreed that teaching VBC within their residency curriculum was important, but only 26.9% of programs have established a formal VBC curriculum. The most frequently taught element is the \\\"evaluation and management of quality outcomes\\\" (80.9%), and VBC is mostly taught through didactics (79.7%). The most frequently reported barrier to teaching VBC was the lack of time within the curriculum and/or competing priorities (37.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residency programs in primary care specialties would benefit from a formal VBC curriculum appropriate for graduate medical education. This curriculum should include assessment tools for residents that include objective measures for VBC skills and training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"298-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.502198\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.502198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:初级保健正在转向基于价值的医疗(VBC)支付模式,该模式衡量并优先考虑质量结果和成本效率。这些模型包括跨学科团队合作、主动小组管理和医疗总成本测量等功能,其具体目标是提高质量和降低医疗成本。即将毕业的住院医师将需要接受VBC关键原则的培训,以便在许多初级保健环境中取得成功。本研究探讨了目前家庭医学住院医师项目中VBC的培训实践。方法:采用学术委员会家庭医学教育研究联盟对家庭医学项目主任进行VBC教育现状评估研究。调查问题评估了项目是否有正式的VBC课程,VBC的哪些要素被教授以及如何教授,以及目前VBC教育的障碍和促进因素。结果:调查总有效率为45.39%(320/705)。大多数受访者(92.2%)认为在住院医师课程中教授VBC很重要,但只有26.9%的项目建立了正式的VBC课程。最常教授的要素是“质量结果的评价和管理”(80.9%),VBC主要通过教学法进行教授(79.7%)。最常见的VBC教学障碍是课程中缺乏时间和/或竞争优先事项(37.5%)。结论:初级保健专业的住院医师项目将受益于适合研究生医学教育的正式VBC课程。该课程应包括住院医师的评估工具,包括VBC技能和培训的客观衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Value-Based Care Education in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Study of Program Directors.

Background and objectives: Primary care is shifting to value-based care (VBC) payment models, which measure and prioritize quality outcomes and cost efficiency. These models include functions such as interdisciplinary teamwork, proactive panel management, and measurement of total cost of care, with the specific aim of improving quality and reducing health care costs. Graduating residents will require training in the key principles of VBC to succeed in many primary care settings. This research study explored current training practices in VBC within family medicine residency programs.

Methods: A Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance study of family medicine program directors assessed the current state of VBC education. The survey questions assessed whether programs had a formal VBC curriculum, what elements of VBC are taught and how, and the present barriers and facilitators to VBC education.

Results: The overall response rate for the survey was 45.39% (320/705). Most respondents (92.2%) agreed that teaching VBC within their residency curriculum was important, but only 26.9% of programs have established a formal VBC curriculum. The most frequently taught element is the "evaluation and management of quality outcomes" (80.9%), and VBC is mostly taught through didactics (79.7%). The most frequently reported barrier to teaching VBC was the lack of time within the curriculum and/or competing priorities (37.5%).

Conclusions: Residency programs in primary care specialties would benefit from a formal VBC curriculum appropriate for graduate medical education. This curriculum should include assessment tools for residents that include objective measures for VBC skills and training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信