Maria Syl de la Cruz, Ashley Chou, Deborah Edberg, William T Leach, Catherine Guariglia, Julie T Schultz, Anna Flattau
{"title":"家庭医学住院医师项目中基于价值的护理教育:项目主任的CERA研究。","authors":"Maria Syl de la Cruz, Ashley Chou, Deborah Edberg, William T Leach, Catherine Guariglia, Julie T Schultz, Anna Flattau","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2025.502198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Primary care is shifting to value-based care (VBC) payment models, which measure and prioritize quality outcomes and cost efficiency. These models include functions such as interdisciplinary teamwork, proactive panel management, and measurement of total cost of care, with the specific aim of improving quality and reducing health care costs. Graduating residents will require training in the key principles of VBC to succeed in many primary care settings. This research study explored current training practices in VBC within family medicine residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance study of family medicine program directors assessed the current state of VBC education. The survey questions assessed whether programs had a formal VBC curriculum, what elements of VBC are taught and how, and the present barriers and facilitators to VBC education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate for the survey was 45.39% (320/705). Most respondents (92.2%) agreed that teaching VBC within their residency curriculum was important, but only 26.9% of programs have established a formal VBC curriculum. The most frequently taught element is the \"evaluation and management of quality outcomes\" (80.9%), and VBC is mostly taught through didactics (79.7%). The most frequently reported barrier to teaching VBC was the lack of time within the curriculum and/or competing priorities (37.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residency programs in primary care specialties would benefit from a formal VBC curriculum appropriate for graduate medical education. This curriculum should include assessment tools for residents that include objective measures for VBC skills and training.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":"57 4","pages":"298-302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value-Based Care Education in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Study of Program Directors.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Syl de la Cruz, Ashley Chou, Deborah Edberg, William T Leach, Catherine Guariglia, Julie T Schultz, Anna Flattau\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/FamMed.2025.502198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Primary care is shifting to value-based care (VBC) payment models, which measure and prioritize quality outcomes and cost efficiency. These models include functions such as interdisciplinary teamwork, proactive panel management, and measurement of total cost of care, with the specific aim of improving quality and reducing health care costs. Graduating residents will require training in the key principles of VBC to succeed in many primary care settings. This research study explored current training practices in VBC within family medicine residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance study of family medicine program directors assessed the current state of VBC education. The survey questions assessed whether programs had a formal VBC curriculum, what elements of VBC are taught and how, and the present barriers and facilitators to VBC education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate for the survey was 45.39% (320/705). Most respondents (92.2%) agreed that teaching VBC within their residency curriculum was important, but only 26.9% of programs have established a formal VBC curriculum. The most frequently taught element is the \\\"evaluation and management of quality outcomes\\\" (80.9%), and VBC is mostly taught through didactics (79.7%). The most frequently reported barrier to teaching VBC was the lack of time within the curriculum and/or competing priorities (37.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residency programs in primary care specialties would benefit from a formal VBC curriculum appropriate for graduate medical education. This curriculum should include assessment tools for residents that include objective measures for VBC skills and training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"298-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.502198\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.502198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Value-Based Care Education in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Study of Program Directors.
Background and objectives: Primary care is shifting to value-based care (VBC) payment models, which measure and prioritize quality outcomes and cost efficiency. These models include functions such as interdisciplinary teamwork, proactive panel management, and measurement of total cost of care, with the specific aim of improving quality and reducing health care costs. Graduating residents will require training in the key principles of VBC to succeed in many primary care settings. This research study explored current training practices in VBC within family medicine residency programs.
Methods: A Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance study of family medicine program directors assessed the current state of VBC education. The survey questions assessed whether programs had a formal VBC curriculum, what elements of VBC are taught and how, and the present barriers and facilitators to VBC education.
Results: The overall response rate for the survey was 45.39% (320/705). Most respondents (92.2%) agreed that teaching VBC within their residency curriculum was important, but only 26.9% of programs have established a formal VBC curriculum. The most frequently taught element is the "evaluation and management of quality outcomes" (80.9%), and VBC is mostly taught through didactics (79.7%). The most frequently reported barrier to teaching VBC was the lack of time within the curriculum and/or competing priorities (37.5%).
Conclusions: Residency programs in primary care specialties would benefit from a formal VBC curriculum appropriate for graduate medical education. This curriculum should include assessment tools for residents that include objective measures for VBC skills and training.
期刊介绍:
Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.