蜂鸟和穿孔虫在半边莲花上的传粉效率:形态契合问题。

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Stefan Abrahamczyk, Ruben Dürr, Emanuel Brenes, María A Maglianesi
{"title":"蜂鸟和穿孔虫在半边莲花上的传粉效率:形态契合问题。","authors":"Stefan Abrahamczyk, Ruben Dürr, Emanuel Brenes, María A Maglianesi","doi":"10.1007/s00442-025-05718-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on pollination systems has largely focused on structures of mutualistic networks, whereas pollinator efficiency defining the quality of visits received much less attention. Different flower-visiting animals can vary in their pollination efficiency, e.g. due to their morphology, size or visitation frequency. Here, we analyse several reproductive traits, including flower morphology and reproductive system of Lobelia laxiflora and compare pollination efficiency of flower visitors based on seed set. We found experimentally that Lobelia laxiflora is completely self-incompatible and that the flowers are frequently visited by Colibri cyanotus, which did not show preferences for one flower sex. Diglossa plumbea was a more rare visitor and concentrated on female flowers Diglossa forced their bills deeply into the dorsally open corolla tube but did not pierce flowers. Corolla tube length perfectly fitted bill length of Colibri cyanotus and lots of pollen was deposited on its heads. In contrast, Diglossa plumbea visited flowers by sitting in different positions to them. Therefore, the reproductive flower organs got in contact with different parts of its body. Consequently, Colibri cyanotus was a very efficient pollinator probably due to the high level of trait matching, whereas Diglossa plumbea was not pollinating at all. In conclusion, our study documents a rare case of a temporally limited one-to-one dependency of a plant and a hummingbird species on the population level. Additionally, it highlights the significant role of morphological trait matching and bird´s behaviour in flower handling for efficient pollination and demonstrates that non-adapted flower visitors may fail as pollinators.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 5","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pollination efficiency of hummingbirds and flowerpiercers at the flowers of Lobelia laxiflora (Campanulaceae): morphological fit matters.\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Abrahamczyk, Ruben Dürr, Emanuel Brenes, María A Maglianesi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00442-025-05718-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research on pollination systems has largely focused on structures of mutualistic networks, whereas pollinator efficiency defining the quality of visits received much less attention. Different flower-visiting animals can vary in their pollination efficiency, e.g. due to their morphology, size or visitation frequency. Here, we analyse several reproductive traits, including flower morphology and reproductive system of Lobelia laxiflora and compare pollination efficiency of flower visitors based on seed set. We found experimentally that Lobelia laxiflora is completely self-incompatible and that the flowers are frequently visited by Colibri cyanotus, which did not show preferences for one flower sex. Diglossa plumbea was a more rare visitor and concentrated on female flowers Diglossa forced their bills deeply into the dorsally open corolla tube but did not pierce flowers. Corolla tube length perfectly fitted bill length of Colibri cyanotus and lots of pollen was deposited on its heads. In contrast, Diglossa plumbea visited flowers by sitting in different positions to them. Therefore, the reproductive flower organs got in contact with different parts of its body. Consequently, Colibri cyanotus was a very efficient pollinator probably due to the high level of trait matching, whereas Diglossa plumbea was not pollinating at all. In conclusion, our study documents a rare case of a temporally limited one-to-one dependency of a plant and a hummingbird species on the population level. Additionally, it highlights the significant role of morphological trait matching and bird´s behaviour in flower handling for efficient pollination and demonstrates that non-adapted flower visitors may fail as pollinators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oecologia\",\"volume\":\"207 5\",\"pages\":\"74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043751/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oecologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05718-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05718-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传粉系统的研究主要集中在互惠网络的结构上,而传粉者的效率定义了访问的质量却很少受到关注。不同的访花动物的授粉效率各不相同,例如由于它们的形态、大小或访花频率。本文分析了半边莲(Lobelia laxiflora)的几个生殖性状,包括花形态和生殖系统,并比较了基于结实率的访花者的授粉效率。通过实验发现,半边莲是完全自交不亲和的,花经常被Colibri cyanotus访问,而Colibri cyanotus没有表现出对一种花性别的偏好。Diglossa plumbea是一种更罕见的来客,主要集中在雌花上,Diglossa将其喙深深地插入背面开放的花冠筒中,但不刺穿花。花冠筒长与喙长完全吻合,花冠上有大量花粉沉积。与之相反的是,狄格罗萨(Diglossa plumbea)通过坐在不同的位置来拜访花朵。因此,生殖花器官与其身体的不同部位接触。结果表明,由于高水平的性状匹配,青色大蠊是一个非常有效的传粉者,而双翅虫则完全不传粉。总之,我们的研究记录了一个罕见的案例,一个植物和一个蜂鸟物种在种群水平上暂时有限的一对一依赖。此外,该研究还强调了形态性状匹配和鸟类行为在花处理中对有效授粉的重要作用,并表明不适应的访花者可能无法作为传粉者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pollination efficiency of hummingbirds and flowerpiercers at the flowers of Lobelia laxiflora (Campanulaceae): morphological fit matters.

Research on pollination systems has largely focused on structures of mutualistic networks, whereas pollinator efficiency defining the quality of visits received much less attention. Different flower-visiting animals can vary in their pollination efficiency, e.g. due to their morphology, size or visitation frequency. Here, we analyse several reproductive traits, including flower morphology and reproductive system of Lobelia laxiflora and compare pollination efficiency of flower visitors based on seed set. We found experimentally that Lobelia laxiflora is completely self-incompatible and that the flowers are frequently visited by Colibri cyanotus, which did not show preferences for one flower sex. Diglossa plumbea was a more rare visitor and concentrated on female flowers Diglossa forced their bills deeply into the dorsally open corolla tube but did not pierce flowers. Corolla tube length perfectly fitted bill length of Colibri cyanotus and lots of pollen was deposited on its heads. In contrast, Diglossa plumbea visited flowers by sitting in different positions to them. Therefore, the reproductive flower organs got in contact with different parts of its body. Consequently, Colibri cyanotus was a very efficient pollinator probably due to the high level of trait matching, whereas Diglossa plumbea was not pollinating at all. In conclusion, our study documents a rare case of a temporally limited one-to-one dependency of a plant and a hummingbird species on the population level. Additionally, it highlights the significant role of morphological trait matching and bird´s behaviour in flower handling for efficient pollination and demonstrates that non-adapted flower visitors may fail as pollinators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信