三种药物治疗前方案中轻度疼痛眼科手术期间犬眼压动态。

IF 1.7 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Veterinary World Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-09 DOI:10.14202/vetworld.2025.573-581
Laura Voiko, Armands Vekšins, Diāna Birnere, Liga Kovalcuka
{"title":"三种药物治疗前方案中轻度疼痛眼科手术期间犬眼压动态。","authors":"Laura Voiko, Armands Vekšins, Diāna Birnere, Liga Kovalcuka","doi":"10.14202/vetworld.2025.573-581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Maintaining intraocular pressure (IOP) stability during ophthalmic procedures is essential to ensuring surgical success and reducing complications related to IOP fluctuations. This study aimed to evaluate IOP dynamics in dogs undergoing mild-pain ophthalmic procedures under three different premedication protocols: butorphanol alone (B), butorphanol with medetomidine (BM), and butorphanol with acepromazine (BA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty clinically healthy client-owned dogs of various breeds (19 males, 11 females, aged 4 months-11 years, weight 7.8-79 kg) were randomized into three groups. IOP was measured at multiple perioperative time points using rebound tonometry: premedication (T0), 5 (T5), and 10 (T10) min after premedication, after intubation (Tint), before surgery (Tbsur), post-surgery (Tasur), during extubation (Text), and before discharge (Tlea). Statistical analyses, including t-tests and Pearson correlation, were performed to assess differences in IOP within and between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant changes in IOP were observed at different time points across groups. The B group showed a significant IOP increase between T0 (15.55 ± 3.50 mmHg) and Tint (19.3 ± 4.19 mmHg) (p < 0.05). In the BM group, IOP increased from T0 (15.9 ± 2.77 mmHg) to Tint (19.15 ± 4.52 mmHg) and decreased significantly postoperatively at Tasur (13.5 ± 3.50 mmHg). The BA group exhibited significant IOP reductions from T0 (20.35 ± 2.78 mmHg) to Tbsur (16.45 ± 3.97 mmHg) and Tlea (17.15 ± 4.22 mmHg). No correlation was found between IOP and sex, breed, or age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IOP remained within normal ranges throughout the perioperative period in all groups. Acepromazine, in combination with butorphanol, was the most effective in attenuating the IOP increase caused by intubation, suggesting its potential advantage in patients at risk of corneal perforation. Clinically, premedication selection should prioritize minimal IOP fluctuation to enhance surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23587,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary World","volume":"18 3","pages":"573-581"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canine intraocular pressure dynamics during mild-pain ophthalmic procedures in three premedication protocols.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Voiko, Armands Vekšins, Diāna Birnere, Liga Kovalcuka\",\"doi\":\"10.14202/vetworld.2025.573-581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Maintaining intraocular pressure (IOP) stability during ophthalmic procedures is essential to ensuring surgical success and reducing complications related to IOP fluctuations. This study aimed to evaluate IOP dynamics in dogs undergoing mild-pain ophthalmic procedures under three different premedication protocols: butorphanol alone (B), butorphanol with medetomidine (BM), and butorphanol with acepromazine (BA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty clinically healthy client-owned dogs of various breeds (19 males, 11 females, aged 4 months-11 years, weight 7.8-79 kg) were randomized into three groups. IOP was measured at multiple perioperative time points using rebound tonometry: premedication (T0), 5 (T5), and 10 (T10) min after premedication, after intubation (Tint), before surgery (Tbsur), post-surgery (Tasur), during extubation (Text), and before discharge (Tlea). Statistical analyses, including t-tests and Pearson correlation, were performed to assess differences in IOP within and between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant changes in IOP were observed at different time points across groups. The B group showed a significant IOP increase between T0 (15.55 ± 3.50 mmHg) and Tint (19.3 ± 4.19 mmHg) (p < 0.05). In the BM group, IOP increased from T0 (15.9 ± 2.77 mmHg) to Tint (19.15 ± 4.52 mmHg) and decreased significantly postoperatively at Tasur (13.5 ± 3.50 mmHg). The BA group exhibited significant IOP reductions from T0 (20.35 ± 2.78 mmHg) to Tbsur (16.45 ± 3.97 mmHg) and Tlea (17.15 ± 4.22 mmHg). No correlation was found between IOP and sex, breed, or age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IOP remained within normal ranges throughout the perioperative period in all groups. Acepromazine, in combination with butorphanol, was the most effective in attenuating the IOP increase caused by intubation, suggesting its potential advantage in patients at risk of corneal perforation. Clinically, premedication selection should prioritize minimal IOP fluctuation to enhance surgical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary World\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"573-581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056905/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2025.573-581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2025.573-581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在眼科手术过程中保持眼内压(IOP)的稳定对于确保手术成功和减少IOP波动相关的并发症至关重要。本研究旨在评估在三种不同的用药前方案下接受轻度疼痛眼科手术的狗的IOP动态:布托啡诺单独(B),布托啡诺与美托咪定(BM),布托啡诺与乙酰丙嗪(BA)。材料与方法:30只临床健康的客户犬,各品种,公19只,母11只,年龄4个月~ 11岁,体重7.8 ~ 79 kg,随机分为3组。在多个围手术期时间点使用反弹眼压计测量IOP:用药前(T0)、5 (T5)和10 (T10) min,用药前、插管后(Tint)、术前(Tbsur)、术后(Tasur)、拔管期间(Text)和出院前(Tlea)。统计分析,包括t检验和Pearson相关性,评估组内和组间IOP的差异。结果:各组患者眼压在不同时间点均有明显变化。B组眼压在T0(15.55±3.50 mmHg)和Tint(19.3±4.19 mmHg)之间显著升高(p < 0.05)。BM组眼压从T0(15.9±2.77 mmHg)升高至Tint(19.15±4.52 mmHg),术后Tasur(13.5±3.50 mmHg)明显下降。BA组IOP从T0(20.35±2.78 mmHg)显著降低到Tbsur(16.45±3.97 mmHg)和Tlea(17.15±4.22 mmHg)。IOP与性别、品种或年龄没有相关性。结论:两组患者围手术期眼压均在正常范围内。乙酰丙嗪联合布托啡诺在降低插管引起的IOP升高方面最有效,这表明其在有角膜穿孔风险的患者中具有潜在的优势。临床上,用药前选择应优先考虑最小的IOP波动,以提高手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Canine intraocular pressure dynamics during mild-pain ophthalmic procedures in three premedication protocols.

Background and aim: Maintaining intraocular pressure (IOP) stability during ophthalmic procedures is essential to ensuring surgical success and reducing complications related to IOP fluctuations. This study aimed to evaluate IOP dynamics in dogs undergoing mild-pain ophthalmic procedures under three different premedication protocols: butorphanol alone (B), butorphanol with medetomidine (BM), and butorphanol with acepromazine (BA).

Materials and methods: Thirty clinically healthy client-owned dogs of various breeds (19 males, 11 females, aged 4 months-11 years, weight 7.8-79 kg) were randomized into three groups. IOP was measured at multiple perioperative time points using rebound tonometry: premedication (T0), 5 (T5), and 10 (T10) min after premedication, after intubation (Tint), before surgery (Tbsur), post-surgery (Tasur), during extubation (Text), and before discharge (Tlea). Statistical analyses, including t-tests and Pearson correlation, were performed to assess differences in IOP within and between groups.

Results: Significant changes in IOP were observed at different time points across groups. The B group showed a significant IOP increase between T0 (15.55 ± 3.50 mmHg) and Tint (19.3 ± 4.19 mmHg) (p < 0.05). In the BM group, IOP increased from T0 (15.9 ± 2.77 mmHg) to Tint (19.15 ± 4.52 mmHg) and decreased significantly postoperatively at Tasur (13.5 ± 3.50 mmHg). The BA group exhibited significant IOP reductions from T0 (20.35 ± 2.78 mmHg) to Tbsur (16.45 ± 3.97 mmHg) and Tlea (17.15 ± 4.22 mmHg). No correlation was found between IOP and sex, breed, or age.

Conclusion: IOP remained within normal ranges throughout the perioperative period in all groups. Acepromazine, in combination with butorphanol, was the most effective in attenuating the IOP increase caused by intubation, suggesting its potential advantage in patients at risk of corneal perforation. Clinically, premedication selection should prioritize minimal IOP fluctuation to enhance surgical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary World
Veterinary World Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
317
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary World publishes high quality papers focusing on Veterinary and Animal Science. The fields of study are bacteriology, parasitology, pathology, virology, immunology, mycology, public health, biotechnology, meat science, fish diseases, nutrition, gynecology, genetics, wildlife, laboratory animals, animal models of human infections, prion diseases and epidemiology. Studies on zoonotic and emerging infections are highly appreciated. Review articles are highly appreciated. All articles published by Veterinary World are made freely and permanently accessible online. All articles to Veterinary World are posted online immediately as they are ready for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信