内镜下镫骨切除术:椭圆窗填充物重要吗?

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maria A Mavrommatis, Jun Yun, Jennifer Ren, Sunder Gidumal, Maura K Cosetti, Enrique Perez, George B Wanna, Zachary G Schwam
{"title":"内镜下镫骨切除术:椭圆窗填充物重要吗?","authors":"Maria A Mavrommatis, Jun Yun, Jennifer Ren, Sunder Gidumal, Maura K Cosetti, Enrique Perez, George B Wanna, Zachary G Schwam","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether differences in audiometric outcomes and postoperative vertigo exist among different approaches to oval window packing after endoscopic stapedectomy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic tertiary care otology-neurotology practice.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients who underwent endoscopic stapedectomy from 2017 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Oval window reinforcement was performed with one of five techniques: lobular fat graft, promontory blood patch, both, other autologous patch, or none.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Our primary outcome measures were subjective postoperative vertigo, change in air-bone gap (ABG; 250-4000 Hz), and air-conduction pure-tone average (PTA; 500/1000/2000/4000 Hz). Patient and surgical variables such as age, sex, laterality, surgeon, primary versus revision surgery, laser versus drill stapedotomy, and prosthesis type and length were secondarily investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 256 ears of 220 patients (mean age, 47.8 ± 12.9 yr) were included for analysis: 143 received promontory blood patch; 54, lobular fat graft; 10, both blood patch and fat graft; 2, temporalis fascia or tragal perichondrium; and 47, no reconstruction. There was no difference in incidence of subjective postoperative vertigo between groups at first and most recent follow-up (p = 0.92 and p = 0.76, respectively). Average improvements in ABG and PTA were not significantly different among groups at first (p = 0.35 and p = 0.27, respectively) and most recent audiograms (p = 0.87 and p = 0.99, respectively). Although there were also no significant differences in percentage of patients achieving ABG closure to within 20 or 10 dB at first postoperative audiogram (p = 0.48 and p = 0.51, respectively), blood patch yielded higher ABG closure to within 10 dB (p = 0.048), but not within 20 dB (p = 0.48) at second postoperative visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blood patch reconstruction may yield better long-term ABG closure compared with fat graft packing and no reconstruction alternatives to oval window reconstruction after endoscopic stapedectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Stapedectomy: Does Oval Window Packing Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Maria A Mavrommatis, Jun Yun, Jennifer Ren, Sunder Gidumal, Maura K Cosetti, Enrique Perez, George B Wanna, Zachary G Schwam\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether differences in audiometric outcomes and postoperative vertigo exist among different approaches to oval window packing after endoscopic stapedectomy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic tertiary care otology-neurotology practice.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients who underwent endoscopic stapedectomy from 2017 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Oval window reinforcement was performed with one of five techniques: lobular fat graft, promontory blood patch, both, other autologous patch, or none.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Our primary outcome measures were subjective postoperative vertigo, change in air-bone gap (ABG; 250-4000 Hz), and air-conduction pure-tone average (PTA; 500/1000/2000/4000 Hz). Patient and surgical variables such as age, sex, laterality, surgeon, primary versus revision surgery, laser versus drill stapedotomy, and prosthesis type and length were secondarily investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 256 ears of 220 patients (mean age, 47.8 ± 12.9 yr) were included for analysis: 143 received promontory blood patch; 54, lobular fat graft; 10, both blood patch and fat graft; 2, temporalis fascia or tragal perichondrium; and 47, no reconstruction. There was no difference in incidence of subjective postoperative vertigo between groups at first and most recent follow-up (p = 0.92 and p = 0.76, respectively). Average improvements in ABG and PTA were not significantly different among groups at first (p = 0.35 and p = 0.27, respectively) and most recent audiograms (p = 0.87 and p = 0.99, respectively). Although there were also no significant differences in percentage of patients achieving ABG closure to within 20 or 10 dB at first postoperative audiogram (p = 0.48 and p = 0.51, respectively), blood patch yielded higher ABG closure to within 10 dB (p = 0.048), but not within 20 dB (p = 0.48) at second postoperative visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blood patch reconstruction may yield better long-term ABG closure compared with fat graft packing and no reconstruction alternatives to oval window reconstruction after endoscopic stapedectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004496\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨内镜下镫骨切除术后不同的椭圆窗填塞入路在听力学结果和术后眩晕方面是否存在差异。研究设计:回顾性图表回顾。背景:学术三级护理耳科-神经学实践。患者:2017年至2023年接受内镜下镫骨切除术的患者。干预措施:使用五种技术中的一种进行椭圆窗加固:小叶脂肪移植、海岬角血液贴片、两者都使用、其他自体贴片或无贴片。主要结局指标:我们的主要结局指标是术后主观眩晕、气骨间隙改变(ABG;250-4000 Hz),以及空气传导纯音平均(PTA;500/1000/2000/4000赫兹)。患者和手术变量,如年龄、性别、侧边、外科医生、初次手术与翻修手术、激光与钻孔镫骨切开术、假体类型和长度进行了二次调查。结果:共纳入220例患者256耳(平均年龄47.8±12.9岁)进行分析:143例患者接受海岬补血;54、小叶脂肪移植;10、血液贴片和脂肪移植均可;2、颞筋膜或侧硬骨膜;47号,没有重建。第一次随访和最近随访时,两组患者术后主观眩晕发生率无差异(p = 0.92和p = 0.76)。各组间ABG和PTA的平均改善在开始时(p = 0.35和p = 0.27)和最近的听力图(p = 0.87和p = 0.99)无显著差异。虽然在术后第一次听图中ABG闭合在20或10 dB以内的患者百分比也没有显著差异(p = 0.48和p = 0.51),但在术后第二次就诊时,血液贴片使ABG闭合在10 dB以内(p = 0.048),而不是在20 dB以内(p = 0.48)。结论:在内镜下镫骨切除术后,与脂肪填充物相比,血贴片重建术可获得更好的长期ABG关闭效果,且与卵圆窗重建术相比,血贴片重建术无重建选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endoscopic Stapedectomy: Does Oval Window Packing Matter?

Objective: To determine whether differences in audiometric outcomes and postoperative vertigo exist among different approaches to oval window packing after endoscopic stapedectomy.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Academic tertiary care otology-neurotology practice.

Patients: Patients who underwent endoscopic stapedectomy from 2017 to 2023.

Interventions: Oval window reinforcement was performed with one of five techniques: lobular fat graft, promontory blood patch, both, other autologous patch, or none.

Main outcome measures: Our primary outcome measures were subjective postoperative vertigo, change in air-bone gap (ABG; 250-4000 Hz), and air-conduction pure-tone average (PTA; 500/1000/2000/4000 Hz). Patient and surgical variables such as age, sex, laterality, surgeon, primary versus revision surgery, laser versus drill stapedotomy, and prosthesis type and length were secondarily investigated.

Results: A total of 256 ears of 220 patients (mean age, 47.8 ± 12.9 yr) were included for analysis: 143 received promontory blood patch; 54, lobular fat graft; 10, both blood patch and fat graft; 2, temporalis fascia or tragal perichondrium; and 47, no reconstruction. There was no difference in incidence of subjective postoperative vertigo between groups at first and most recent follow-up (p = 0.92 and p = 0.76, respectively). Average improvements in ABG and PTA were not significantly different among groups at first (p = 0.35 and p = 0.27, respectively) and most recent audiograms (p = 0.87 and p = 0.99, respectively). Although there were also no significant differences in percentage of patients achieving ABG closure to within 20 or 10 dB at first postoperative audiogram (p = 0.48 and p = 0.51, respectively), blood patch yielded higher ABG closure to within 10 dB (p = 0.048), but not within 20 dB (p = 0.48) at second postoperative visit.

Conclusions: Blood patch reconstruction may yield better long-term ABG closure compared with fat graft packing and no reconstruction alternatives to oval window reconstruction after endoscopic stapedectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信