Umael Khan , Tom Roar Omdal , Cathrine Ebbing , Jörg Kessler , Elisabeth Leirgul , Gottfried Greve
{"title":"平滑和漂移补偿对胎儿应变的影响。","authors":"Umael Khan , Tom Roar Omdal , Cathrine Ebbing , Jörg Kessler , Elisabeth Leirgul , Gottfried Greve","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to assess the effect of user-regulated image-processing settings (spatial smoothing, temporal smoothing and drift compensation) on fetal left ventricular strain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Left ventricular average longitudinal strain was acquired from the four-chamber view of the fetal heart from 34 fetuses, with 30 fetuses presenting adequate quality. A total of 18 different settings for spatial smoothing, temporal smoothing and drift compensation were examined. At each setting the average strain for the 30 fetuses was calculated, whereby one could examine whether there was an average difference in fetal strain at the different settings. Furthermore, the difference between the highest and lowest strain values across the 18 settings was assessed for each fetus (min-max difference). The average min-max difference was then calculated across the 30 fetuses to calculate the mean discrepancy in fetal strain due to smoothing settings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average effect of the smoothing settings as well as drift compensation by them was small. However, when examining the discrepancy induced by the different settings together, they induced average proportional differences of approximately 18% for the endocardial and epicardial layers and 15% for the mid-wall layer.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study shows that while the average effect of different smoothing settings and drift compensation was small, they induced significant discrepancy in strain values on the individual level. We recommend that examiners be consistent with regard to smoothing and drift compensation settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"51 7","pages":"Pages 1148-1152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Smoothing and Drift Compensation on Fetal Strain\",\"authors\":\"Umael Khan , Tom Roar Omdal , Cathrine Ebbing , Jörg Kessler , Elisabeth Leirgul , Gottfried Greve\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.03.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to assess the effect of user-regulated image-processing settings (spatial smoothing, temporal smoothing and drift compensation) on fetal left ventricular strain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Left ventricular average longitudinal strain was acquired from the four-chamber view of the fetal heart from 34 fetuses, with 30 fetuses presenting adequate quality. A total of 18 different settings for spatial smoothing, temporal smoothing and drift compensation were examined. At each setting the average strain for the 30 fetuses was calculated, whereby one could examine whether there was an average difference in fetal strain at the different settings. Furthermore, the difference between the highest and lowest strain values across the 18 settings was assessed for each fetus (min-max difference). The average min-max difference was then calculated across the 30 fetuses to calculate the mean discrepancy in fetal strain due to smoothing settings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average effect of the smoothing settings as well as drift compensation by them was small. However, when examining the discrepancy induced by the different settings together, they induced average proportional differences of approximately 18% for the endocardial and epicardial layers and 15% for the mid-wall layer.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study shows that while the average effect of different smoothing settings and drift compensation was small, they induced significant discrepancy in strain values on the individual level. We recommend that examiners be consistent with regard to smoothing and drift compensation settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"51 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1148-1152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562925000936\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562925000936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect of Smoothing and Drift Compensation on Fetal Strain
Objective
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of user-regulated image-processing settings (spatial smoothing, temporal smoothing and drift compensation) on fetal left ventricular strain.
Methods
Left ventricular average longitudinal strain was acquired from the four-chamber view of the fetal heart from 34 fetuses, with 30 fetuses presenting adequate quality. A total of 18 different settings for spatial smoothing, temporal smoothing and drift compensation were examined. At each setting the average strain for the 30 fetuses was calculated, whereby one could examine whether there was an average difference in fetal strain at the different settings. Furthermore, the difference between the highest and lowest strain values across the 18 settings was assessed for each fetus (min-max difference). The average min-max difference was then calculated across the 30 fetuses to calculate the mean discrepancy in fetal strain due to smoothing settings.
Results
The average effect of the smoothing settings as well as drift compensation by them was small. However, when examining the discrepancy induced by the different settings together, they induced average proportional differences of approximately 18% for the endocardial and epicardial layers and 15% for the mid-wall layer.
Conclusion
This study shows that while the average effect of different smoothing settings and drift compensation was small, they induced significant discrepancy in strain values on the individual level. We recommend that examiners be consistent with regard to smoothing and drift compensation settings.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.