中国公立医院自治改革对医院效率的影响:DEA-ITSA联合分析

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S514512
Ningbo An, Quan Zou, Ji-Bin Li, Kaiyuan Luo, Gang Sun, Xing Ni, Oudong Xia
{"title":"中国公立医院自治改革对医院效率的影响:DEA-ITSA联合分析","authors":"Ningbo An, Quan Zou, Ji-Bin Li, Kaiyuan Luo, Gang Sun, Xing Ni, Oudong Xia","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S514512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Since 2014, China has been rolling out a new autonomy reform for public hospitals, aiming to enhance their efficiency and better utilize the health budgets. The purpose of this research is to assess the reform's success and explore its effects on hospital outcome efficiency, laying a foundation based on empirical evidence for future policy decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data envelopment analysis(DEA) and interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) approaches were combined to analyze the reform impacts on the 16 samples of Shenzhen municipal public hospitals in China, using data extracted from the Shenzhen Health Statistics Yearbook from 2002 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that from 2002 to 2023, 15 out of 16 sample hospitals achieved total factor productivity improvement in Shenzhen city of China, with the average growth rate of Malmquist total factor productivity index(MI) was 3.05% and the highest growth rate was 6.93%, yet only one hospital showing a growth rate of -0.02%. The results of ITSA show a significant intervention in 2014. After the policy intervention, the fixed reference Malmquist total factor productivity index(FRMI) for the general and the specialty hospital group increased at rates of 0.04680(P<0.000) and 0.1746(p<0.000) per year by the Newey-West model, similarly, the rates of 0.04689(P<0.000) and 0.1762(p<0.000) per year by the Prais-Winsten model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reform has positively impacted public hospitals' total factor productivity(TFP). The TFP of the general hospitals was increasing before the policy intervention of autonomy hospitals, but the time of its implementation was associated with a more significant rise. Meanwhile, the TFP of specialty hospitals decreased before the intervention; however, its trend shifted to growth after the intervention. This research further emphasizes the applicability of the DEA-ITSA combination method as an effective tool for health policies evaluation using public data within China's healthcare framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1333-1346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Autonomy Reform on the Efficiency of Public Hospitals in China: A DEA-ITSA Combination Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ningbo An, Quan Zou, Ji-Bin Li, Kaiyuan Luo, Gang Sun, Xing Ni, Oudong Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S514512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Since 2014, China has been rolling out a new autonomy reform for public hospitals, aiming to enhance their efficiency and better utilize the health budgets. The purpose of this research is to assess the reform's success and explore its effects on hospital outcome efficiency, laying a foundation based on empirical evidence for future policy decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data envelopment analysis(DEA) and interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) approaches were combined to analyze the reform impacts on the 16 samples of Shenzhen municipal public hospitals in China, using data extracted from the Shenzhen Health Statistics Yearbook from 2002 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that from 2002 to 2023, 15 out of 16 sample hospitals achieved total factor productivity improvement in Shenzhen city of China, with the average growth rate of Malmquist total factor productivity index(MI) was 3.05% and the highest growth rate was 6.93%, yet only one hospital showing a growth rate of -0.02%. The results of ITSA show a significant intervention in 2014. After the policy intervention, the fixed reference Malmquist total factor productivity index(FRMI) for the general and the specialty hospital group increased at rates of 0.04680(P<0.000) and 0.1746(p<0.000) per year by the Newey-West model, similarly, the rates of 0.04689(P<0.000) and 0.1762(p<0.000) per year by the Prais-Winsten model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reform has positively impacted public hospitals' total factor productivity(TFP). The TFP of the general hospitals was increasing before the policy intervention of autonomy hospitals, but the time of its implementation was associated with a more significant rise. Meanwhile, the TFP of specialty hospitals decreased before the intervention; however, its trend shifted to growth after the intervention. This research further emphasizes the applicability of the DEA-ITSA combination method as an effective tool for health policies evaluation using public data within China's healthcare framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1333-1346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009585/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S514512\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S514512","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自2014年以来,中国一直在推行新的公立医院自治改革,旨在提高公立医院的效率,更好地利用卫生预算。本研究的目的是评估改革的成功,并探讨其对医院结局效率的影响,为未来的政策决策奠定基于经验证据的基础。方法:采用数据包络分析(DEA)和中断时间序列分析(ITSA)相结合的方法,利用2002 - 2023年《深圳市卫生统计年鉴》的数据,分析深圳市16家公立医院改革对改革的影响。结果:2002 - 2023年,深圳市16家样本医院中有15家实现了全要素生产率的提升,其中Malmquist全要素生产率指数(MI)平均增长率为3.05%,最高增长率为6.93%,只有1家医院的增长率为-0.02%。2014年的ITSA结果显示出显著的干预。政策干预后,综合医院和专科医院集团的固定参考Malmquist全要素生产率指数(FRMI)均以0.04680的速率上升(p)。结论:改革对公立医院的全要素生产率(TFP)产生了积极影响。综合医院TFP在自主医院政策干预前呈上升趋势,但政策干预实施时间与TFP上升的相关性更显著。专科医院TFP在干预前有所下降;但干预后,其走势转为增长。本研究进一步强调了DEA-ITSA组合方法作为中国卫生保健框架内使用公共数据进行卫生政策评估的有效工具的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Autonomy Reform on the Efficiency of Public Hospitals in China: A DEA-ITSA Combination Analysis.

Purpose: Since 2014, China has been rolling out a new autonomy reform for public hospitals, aiming to enhance their efficiency and better utilize the health budgets. The purpose of this research is to assess the reform's success and explore its effects on hospital outcome efficiency, laying a foundation based on empirical evidence for future policy decisions.

Methods: The data envelopment analysis(DEA) and interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) approaches were combined to analyze the reform impacts on the 16 samples of Shenzhen municipal public hospitals in China, using data extracted from the Shenzhen Health Statistics Yearbook from 2002 to 2023.

Results: The results revealed that from 2002 to 2023, 15 out of 16 sample hospitals achieved total factor productivity improvement in Shenzhen city of China, with the average growth rate of Malmquist total factor productivity index(MI) was 3.05% and the highest growth rate was 6.93%, yet only one hospital showing a growth rate of -0.02%. The results of ITSA show a significant intervention in 2014. After the policy intervention, the fixed reference Malmquist total factor productivity index(FRMI) for the general and the specialty hospital group increased at rates of 0.04680(P<0.000) and 0.1746(p<0.000) per year by the Newey-West model, similarly, the rates of 0.04689(P<0.000) and 0.1762(p<0.000) per year by the Prais-Winsten model.

Conclusion: The reform has positively impacted public hospitals' total factor productivity(TFP). The TFP of the general hospitals was increasing before the policy intervention of autonomy hospitals, but the time of its implementation was associated with a more significant rise. Meanwhile, the TFP of specialty hospitals decreased before the intervention; however, its trend shifted to growth after the intervention. This research further emphasizes the applicability of the DEA-ITSA combination method as an effective tool for health policies evaluation using public data within China's healthcare framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信