极低出生体重儿子宫外胎盘灌注后的神经发育结局:一项随访研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Acta Paediatrica Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1111/apa.70101
Benjamin Kuehne, Martin Hellmich, Eva Heine, Angela Kribs, Katrin Mehler, André Oberthuer
{"title":"极低出生体重儿子宫外胎盘灌注后的神经发育结局:一项随访研究。","authors":"Benjamin Kuehne, Martin Hellmich, Eva Heine, Angela Kribs, Katrin Mehler, André Oberthuer","doi":"10.1111/apa.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Extrauterine placental perfusion (EPP) may be a feasible cord clamping strategy in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants to support neonatal transition. However, the impact of EPP on neurodevelopment remains unclear. The study aimed to compare the effects of EPP with time-based delayed cord clamping (DCC) on neurodevelopmental outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This follow-up study of the randomised controlled EXPLAIN (Extrauterine Placental Transfusion in Resuscitation of Very Low Birth Weight Infants) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03916159) was conducted at a tertiary perinatal centre from 2021 to 2023. Antenatally randomised VLBW infants received either EPP or DCC (> 30 s). Neurodevelopment was assessed at 24 months of corrected age using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. Data analysis was intention-to-treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 59 infants enrolled, 54 (92%) participated in the follow-up (27 EPP, 27 DCC). Median age at assessment was 24.3 months (range 23.5-25.0); 28 (52%) were male. Infant characteristics and short-term outcomes were similar between groups. No relevant differences were observed in median cognitive, motor or language scores or in rates of cerebral palsy, hearing, or visual impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The neurodevelopment of the VLBW infants who received EPP and DCC was comparable, suggesting that EPP may be a viable alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Infants Following Extrauterine Placental Perfusion: A Follow-Up Study.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Kuehne, Martin Hellmich, Eva Heine, Angela Kribs, Katrin Mehler, André Oberthuer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apa.70101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Extrauterine placental perfusion (EPP) may be a feasible cord clamping strategy in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants to support neonatal transition. However, the impact of EPP on neurodevelopment remains unclear. The study aimed to compare the effects of EPP with time-based delayed cord clamping (DCC) on neurodevelopmental outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This follow-up study of the randomised controlled EXPLAIN (Extrauterine Placental Transfusion in Resuscitation of Very Low Birth Weight Infants) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03916159) was conducted at a tertiary perinatal centre from 2021 to 2023. Antenatally randomised VLBW infants received either EPP or DCC (> 30 s). Neurodevelopment was assessed at 24 months of corrected age using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. Data analysis was intention-to-treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 59 infants enrolled, 54 (92%) participated in the follow-up (27 EPP, 27 DCC). Median age at assessment was 24.3 months (range 23.5-25.0); 28 (52%) were male. Infant characteristics and short-term outcomes were similar between groups. No relevant differences were observed in median cognitive, motor or language scores or in rates of cerebral palsy, hearing, or visual impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The neurodevelopment of the VLBW infants who received EPP and DCC was comparable, suggesting that EPP may be a viable alternative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Paediatrica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Paediatrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:子宫外胎盘灌注(EPP)可能是极低出生体重儿(VLBW)支持新生儿过渡的一种可行的脐带夹紧策略。然而,EPP对神经发育的影响尚不清楚。该研究旨在比较EPP与时间延迟脐带夹紧(DCC)对神经发育结局的影响。方法:这项随机对照EXPLAIN(子宫外胎盘输血在极低出生体重儿复苏中的应用)试验(ClinicalTrials.gov识别符:NCT03916159)的随访研究于2021年至2023年在一家三级围产期中心进行。产前随机分组的VLBW婴儿接受EPP或DCC (bbb30 s)。在矫正年龄24个月时使用Bayley婴幼儿发育量表(第三版)评估神经发育。数据分析是意向治疗。结果:入选的59名婴儿中,54名(92%)参加了随访(27名EPP, 27名DCC)。评估时的中位年龄为24.3个月(范围23.5-25.0);男性28例(52%)。两组之间的婴儿特征和短期结果相似。在认知、运动或语言评分中位数,以及脑瘫、听力或视觉障碍的发生率方面,没有观察到相关差异。结论:接受EPP和DCC的VLBW婴儿的神经发育具有可比性,提示EPP可能是一种可行的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Infants Following Extrauterine Placental Perfusion: A Follow-Up Study.

Aim: Extrauterine placental perfusion (EPP) may be a feasible cord clamping strategy in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants to support neonatal transition. However, the impact of EPP on neurodevelopment remains unclear. The study aimed to compare the effects of EPP with time-based delayed cord clamping (DCC) on neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Methods: This follow-up study of the randomised controlled EXPLAIN (Extrauterine Placental Transfusion in Resuscitation of Very Low Birth Weight Infants) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03916159) was conducted at a tertiary perinatal centre from 2021 to 2023. Antenatally randomised VLBW infants received either EPP or DCC (> 30 s). Neurodevelopment was assessed at 24 months of corrected age using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. Data analysis was intention-to-treat.

Results: Of 59 infants enrolled, 54 (92%) participated in the follow-up (27 EPP, 27 DCC). Median age at assessment was 24.3 months (range 23.5-25.0); 28 (52%) were male. Infant characteristics and short-term outcomes were similar between groups. No relevant differences were observed in median cognitive, motor or language scores or in rates of cerebral palsy, hearing, or visual impairment.

Conclusion: The neurodevelopment of the VLBW infants who received EPP and DCC was comparable, suggesting that EPP may be a viable alternative.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Paediatrica
Acta Paediatrica 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
384
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including: neonatal medicine developmental medicine adolescent medicine child health and environment psychosomatic pediatrics child health in developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信