在圣克拉拉县,提供者和无家可归的病人对获得眼科护理的看法:一项定性研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jay Minsu Liu, Michelle Chang, Frank Minjie Liu, Binisha Patel, David Shi-Ann Chang
{"title":"在圣克拉拉县,提供者和无家可归的病人对获得眼科护理的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Jay Minsu Liu, Michelle Chang, Frank Minjie Liu, Binisha Patel, David Shi-Ann Chang","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Perspectives on eye care barriers differ between low-income patients and vision care providers. Comparing these views provides valuable insight into strategies for addressing disparities in underserved communities, especially in regions with significant income inequality and opportunity gaps.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim is to identify obstacles that prevent individuals who are unhoused, have low income, or are publicly insured in Santa Clara County from accessing basic refractive eye exams and corrective glasses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged ≥18 years with low income presenting to a free vision care clinic in Northern California (n = 15) and vision care providers who primarily work with underserved patients in Santa Clara County, California (n = 11) participated in one-on-one phone interviews. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (87% patients and 82% providers) say that basic vision care (refractive eye exam and eyeglasses) in Santa Clara County is unaffordable and that in-person eye exams can be physically inaccessible (67% patients and 91% providers) due to busy work schedules or limited access to transportation. However, patient and provider perspectives on intrinsic barriers to accessing eye care diverge. In total, 73% of providers stated that limited health literacy contributed to lower utilization of routine vision care, while 47% of patients cited limited empathy from providers as responsible for their negative experiences and dissatisfaction with care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Santa Clara County, patients with low income and their providers both identify similar external barriers to basic vision care: high costs, inadequate insurance coverage, and limited services. However, patients and providers may disagree on intrinsic barriers to accessing care. Suggestions for improving access to vision care include more help from healthcare coordinators, better information about affordable services, improved vision insurance, and mobile healthcare options.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of providers and unhoused patients on access to eye care in Santa Clara County: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Jay Minsu Liu, Michelle Chang, Frank Minjie Liu, Binisha Patel, David Shi-Ann Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Perspectives on eye care barriers differ between low-income patients and vision care providers. Comparing these views provides valuable insight into strategies for addressing disparities in underserved communities, especially in regions with significant income inequality and opportunity gaps.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim is to identify obstacles that prevent individuals who are unhoused, have low income, or are publicly insured in Santa Clara County from accessing basic refractive eye exams and corrective glasses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged ≥18 years with low income presenting to a free vision care clinic in Northern California (n = 15) and vision care providers who primarily work with underserved patients in Santa Clara County, California (n = 11) participated in one-on-one phone interviews. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (87% patients and 82% providers) say that basic vision care (refractive eye exam and eyeglasses) in Santa Clara County is unaffordable and that in-person eye exams can be physically inaccessible (67% patients and 91% providers) due to busy work schedules or limited access to transportation. However, patient and provider perspectives on intrinsic barriers to accessing eye care diverge. In total, 73% of providers stated that limited health literacy contributed to lower utilization of routine vision care, while 47% of patients cited limited empathy from providers as responsible for their negative experiences and dissatisfaction with care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Santa Clara County, patients with low income and their providers both identify similar external barriers to basic vision care: high costs, inadequate insurance coverage, and limited services. However, patients and providers may disagree on intrinsic barriers to accessing care. Suggestions for improving access to vision care include more help from healthcare coordinators, better information about affordable services, improved vision insurance, and mobile healthcare options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002250\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意义:低收入患者和视力保健提供者对眼保健障碍的看法存在差异。比较这些观点可以为解决服务不足社区的差距问题提供有价值的见解,特别是在收入不平等和机会差距严重的地区。目的:目的是确定阻碍圣克拉拉县无家可归者、低收入者或有公共保险的人获得基本屈光检查和矫正眼镜的障碍。方法:在北加州一家免费视力保健诊所就诊的年龄≥18岁的低收入患者(n = 15)和加州圣克拉拉县主要为服务不足患者服务的视力保健提供者(n = 11)参加了一对一的电话访谈。采访被记录下来并进行分析。结果:大多数参与者(87%的患者和82%的提供者)表示,在圣克拉拉县,基本的视力保健(屈光检查和眼镜)是负担不起的,而且由于工作繁忙或交通不便,无法亲自进行眼科检查(67%的患者和91%的提供者)。然而,患者和提供者对获得眼科护理的内在障碍的看法存在分歧。总的来说,73%的提供者表示,有限的健康知识导致常规视力保健的使用率较低,而47%的患者认为提供者的同情心有限是他们的负面经历和对护理的不满的原因。结论:在圣克拉拉县,低收入患者和他们的提供者都认为基本视力保健的外部障碍相似:费用高,保险覆盖面不足,服务有限。然而,患者和提供者可能在获得护理的内在障碍上存在分歧。改善视力保健服务的建议包括提供更多医疗保健协调员的帮助、提供有关可负担服务的更好信息、改进视力保险和移动医疗保健选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of providers and unhoused patients on access to eye care in Santa Clara County: A qualitative study.

Significance: Perspectives on eye care barriers differ between low-income patients and vision care providers. Comparing these views provides valuable insight into strategies for addressing disparities in underserved communities, especially in regions with significant income inequality and opportunity gaps.

Purpose: The aim is to identify obstacles that prevent individuals who are unhoused, have low income, or are publicly insured in Santa Clara County from accessing basic refractive eye exams and corrective glasses.

Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with low income presenting to a free vision care clinic in Northern California (n = 15) and vision care providers who primarily work with underserved patients in Santa Clara County, California (n = 11) participated in one-on-one phone interviews. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed.

Results: Most participants (87% patients and 82% providers) say that basic vision care (refractive eye exam and eyeglasses) in Santa Clara County is unaffordable and that in-person eye exams can be physically inaccessible (67% patients and 91% providers) due to busy work schedules or limited access to transportation. However, patient and provider perspectives on intrinsic barriers to accessing eye care diverge. In total, 73% of providers stated that limited health literacy contributed to lower utilization of routine vision care, while 47% of patients cited limited empathy from providers as responsible for their negative experiences and dissatisfaction with care.

Conclusions: In Santa Clara County, patients with low income and their providers both identify similar external barriers to basic vision care: high costs, inadequate insurance coverage, and limited services. However, patients and providers may disagree on intrinsic barriers to accessing care. Suggestions for improving access to vision care include more help from healthcare coordinators, better information about affordable services, improved vision insurance, and mobile healthcare options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信