调频敏感性的心理生理和电生理测量:年龄和耳间调频相位的影响。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
John H Grose, Heidi Martini-Stoica, Monica Folkerts, Stacey Kane, Emily Buss
{"title":"调频敏感性的心理生理和电生理测量:年龄和耳间调频相位的影响。","authors":"John H Grose, Heidi Martini-Stoica, Monica Folkerts, Stacey Kane, Emily Buss","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to measure sensitivity to interaurally in-phase and out-of-phase frequency modulation (FM) using parallel behavioral and electrophysiological approaches. The broader goal was to apply these approaches to the assessment of age-related deficits in temporal fine-structure processing. The hypothesis was that the range of modulation rates over which FM detection is superior for out-of-phase modulation, as well as the magnitude of benefit, diminishes with age due to reduced fidelity of temporal fine-structure processing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Participants were 63 adults with good audiometric hearing for their age divided equally into 3 age groups of young (mean = 23 years), middle-aged (mean = 47 years), and older (mean = 70 years) listeners. FM detection thresholds for stimuli carried by a nominally 500-Hz tone were measured for interaurally in-phase and out-of-phase modulators having rates ranging from 4 to 32 Hz. The rationale for restricting carrier and modulator frequencies to low rates was to focus on the benefit provided by interaurally out-of-phase modulators as a gauge of temporal fine-structure processing. The electrophysiological acoustic change complex (ACC) was also measured in the same participants for a subset of these modulation rates where the depth of modulation was fixed at 3 Hz. The ACC was quantified using an intertrial phase coherence metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For in-phase modulation, there was minimal change in FM detection threshold across the range of modulation rates, and no effects of age. For out-of-phase modulation, thresholds were markedly lower for low rates and increased (became poorer) monotonically as rate increased. For the 2 older age groups, thresholds for the 2 modulator phases converged by 32 Hz. Young participants performed consistently better than the participants in the 2 older groups for the out-of-phase configurations. The ACC was most robust for low-rate, out-of-phase modulation and diminished systematically as rate increased in all participants. No ACC was observed for the highest rate of 32 Hz. The older listeners had consistently poorer ACC responses across all rates. Correlations between behavioral and electrophysiological metrics were small, but significant, for rates of 8, 16, and 24 Hz.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results support the hypothesis of diminishing temporal fine-structure processing as a function of age. For behavioral FM detection, middle-age and older adults had poorer thresholds for out-of-phase FM than young adults, with functions for in- and out-of-phase FM converging at a lower rate. For the ACC test, this was demonstrated by reduced intertrial phase coherences in the older participants. Although there were general similarities between the behavioral and electrophysiological data patterns, some differences were observed, and further study is required to clarify underlying mechanism(s). The study broadly demonstrates that objective measures can be used to gauge temporal processing, in parallel to behavioral measures, and so can be applied in situations where subjective assessment is challenging.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychophysical and Electrophysiological Measures of Frequency Modulation Sensitivity: Effects of Age and Interaural Modulator Phase.\",\"authors\":\"John H Grose, Heidi Martini-Stoica, Monica Folkerts, Stacey Kane, Emily Buss\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to measure sensitivity to interaurally in-phase and out-of-phase frequency modulation (FM) using parallel behavioral and electrophysiological approaches. The broader goal was to apply these approaches to the assessment of age-related deficits in temporal fine-structure processing. The hypothesis was that the range of modulation rates over which FM detection is superior for out-of-phase modulation, as well as the magnitude of benefit, diminishes with age due to reduced fidelity of temporal fine-structure processing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Participants were 63 adults with good audiometric hearing for their age divided equally into 3 age groups of young (mean = 23 years), middle-aged (mean = 47 years), and older (mean = 70 years) listeners. FM detection thresholds for stimuli carried by a nominally 500-Hz tone were measured for interaurally in-phase and out-of-phase modulators having rates ranging from 4 to 32 Hz. The rationale for restricting carrier and modulator frequencies to low rates was to focus on the benefit provided by interaurally out-of-phase modulators as a gauge of temporal fine-structure processing. The electrophysiological acoustic change complex (ACC) was also measured in the same participants for a subset of these modulation rates where the depth of modulation was fixed at 3 Hz. The ACC was quantified using an intertrial phase coherence metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For in-phase modulation, there was minimal change in FM detection threshold across the range of modulation rates, and no effects of age. For out-of-phase modulation, thresholds were markedly lower for low rates and increased (became poorer) monotonically as rate increased. For the 2 older age groups, thresholds for the 2 modulator phases converged by 32 Hz. Young participants performed consistently better than the participants in the 2 older groups for the out-of-phase configurations. The ACC was most robust for low-rate, out-of-phase modulation and diminished systematically as rate increased in all participants. No ACC was observed for the highest rate of 32 Hz. The older listeners had consistently poorer ACC responses across all rates. Correlations between behavioral and electrophysiological metrics were small, but significant, for rates of 8, 16, and 24 Hz.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results support the hypothesis of diminishing temporal fine-structure processing as a function of age. For behavioral FM detection, middle-age and older adults had poorer thresholds for out-of-phase FM than young adults, with functions for in- and out-of-phase FM converging at a lower rate. For the ACC test, this was demonstrated by reduced intertrial phase coherences in the older participants. Although there were general similarities between the behavioral and electrophysiological data patterns, some differences were observed, and further study is required to clarify underlying mechanism(s). The study broadly demonstrates that objective measures can be used to gauge temporal processing, in parallel to behavioral measures, and so can be applied in situations where subjective assessment is challenging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear and Hearing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear and Hearing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001671\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001671","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是利用平行行为和电生理方法测量对耳间同相和异相调频(FM)的敏感性。更广泛的目标是将这些方法应用于评估与年龄相关的时间精细结构处理缺陷。假设调频检测优于非相位调制的调制速率范围,以及收益的大小,由于时间精细结构处理的保真度降低而随着年龄的增长而减少。设计:参与者为63名与他们的年龄相仿的听力良好的成年人,平均分为3个年龄组:年轻(平均= 23岁)、中年(平均= 47岁)和老年(平均= 70岁)听众。在频率范围为4至32 Hz的内部同相调制器和非同相调制器上测量了名义上为500 Hz的音调所携带的刺激的调频检测阈值。将载波和调制器频率限制在低速率的基本原理是将重点放在作为时间精细结构处理标准的内部非相位调制器提供的好处上。在这些调制速率的一个子集中,当调制深度固定在3hz时,也测量了相同参与者的电生理声学变化复合体(ACC)。ACC采用试验间相相干度量法进行量化。结果:对于同相调制,调频检测阈值在调制速率范围内变化最小,且不受年龄的影响。对于相外调制,低速率时阈值明显降低,并且随着速率的增加而单调增加(变得更差)。对于2个年龄较大的年龄组,2个调制器相位的阈值收敛32hz。年轻参与者在非阶段配置中的表现始终优于两组年长参与者。在所有参与者中,ACC在低速率、非相位调制时最为稳健,并随着速率的增加而系统性地减弱。最高频率为32 Hz时未见ACC。年龄较大的听众在所有情况下的前扣带皮层反应都较差。对于8、16和24 Hz的频率,行为和电生理指标之间的相关性很小,但很重要。结论:研究结果支持时间精细结构加工随着年龄的增长而减弱的假设。在行为调频检测中,中老年人的调频阈值较年轻人低,调频功能的同相和异相收敛率较低。在ACC测试中,老年参与者的试验期间一致性降低证明了这一点。虽然在行为和电生理数据模式之间存在普遍的相似性,但也观察到一些差异,需要进一步研究以阐明潜在的机制。该研究广泛地表明,客观测量可以用来衡量时间处理,与行为测量并行,因此可以在主观评估具有挑战性的情况下应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychophysical and Electrophysiological Measures of Frequency Modulation Sensitivity: Effects of Age and Interaural Modulator Phase.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to measure sensitivity to interaurally in-phase and out-of-phase frequency modulation (FM) using parallel behavioral and electrophysiological approaches. The broader goal was to apply these approaches to the assessment of age-related deficits in temporal fine-structure processing. The hypothesis was that the range of modulation rates over which FM detection is superior for out-of-phase modulation, as well as the magnitude of benefit, diminishes with age due to reduced fidelity of temporal fine-structure processing.

Design: Participants were 63 adults with good audiometric hearing for their age divided equally into 3 age groups of young (mean = 23 years), middle-aged (mean = 47 years), and older (mean = 70 years) listeners. FM detection thresholds for stimuli carried by a nominally 500-Hz tone were measured for interaurally in-phase and out-of-phase modulators having rates ranging from 4 to 32 Hz. The rationale for restricting carrier and modulator frequencies to low rates was to focus on the benefit provided by interaurally out-of-phase modulators as a gauge of temporal fine-structure processing. The electrophysiological acoustic change complex (ACC) was also measured in the same participants for a subset of these modulation rates where the depth of modulation was fixed at 3 Hz. The ACC was quantified using an intertrial phase coherence metric.

Results: For in-phase modulation, there was minimal change in FM detection threshold across the range of modulation rates, and no effects of age. For out-of-phase modulation, thresholds were markedly lower for low rates and increased (became poorer) monotonically as rate increased. For the 2 older age groups, thresholds for the 2 modulator phases converged by 32 Hz. Young participants performed consistently better than the participants in the 2 older groups for the out-of-phase configurations. The ACC was most robust for low-rate, out-of-phase modulation and diminished systematically as rate increased in all participants. No ACC was observed for the highest rate of 32 Hz. The older listeners had consistently poorer ACC responses across all rates. Correlations between behavioral and electrophysiological metrics were small, but significant, for rates of 8, 16, and 24 Hz.

Conclusions: The results support the hypothesis of diminishing temporal fine-structure processing as a function of age. For behavioral FM detection, middle-age and older adults had poorer thresholds for out-of-phase FM than young adults, with functions for in- and out-of-phase FM converging at a lower rate. For the ACC test, this was demonstrated by reduced intertrial phase coherences in the older participants. Although there were general similarities between the behavioral and electrophysiological data patterns, some differences were observed, and further study is required to clarify underlying mechanism(s). The study broadly demonstrates that objective measures can be used to gauge temporal processing, in parallel to behavioral measures, and so can be applied in situations where subjective assessment is challenging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ear and Hearing
Ear and Hearing 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From the basic science of hearing and balance disorders to auditory electrophysiology to amplification and the psychological factors of hearing loss, Ear and Hearing covers all aspects of auditory and vestibular disorders. This multidisciplinary journal consolidates the various factors that contribute to identification, remediation, and audiologic and vestibular rehabilitation. It is the one journal that serves the diverse interest of all members of this professional community -- otologists, audiologists, educators, and to those involved in the design, manufacture, and distribution of amplification systems. The original articles published in the journal focus on assessment, diagnosis, and management of auditory and vestibular disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信