肺移植后疑似下呼吸道感染的不同房室多重pcr即时检测——一项前瞻性研究的结果

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Susanne Simon, Merle Sophie Kaiser, Marcus Bachmann, Gérard Krause, Jens Gottlieb
{"title":"肺移植后疑似下呼吸道感染的不同房室多重pcr即时检测——一项前瞻性研究的结果","authors":"Susanne Simon, Merle Sophie Kaiser, Marcus Bachmann, Gérard Krause, Jens Gottlieb","doi":"10.1111/tid.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation (LTx). This study evaluated a point-of-care multiplex-PCR testing system (POCTmPCR) for pathogen detection in various respiratory samples from LTx recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective single-center study, LTx recipients with RTI undergoing bronchoscopy were enrolled. Samples from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), sputum, and nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) were analyzed by POCTmPCR in conjunction with conventional diagnostics. The primary study endpoint was the concordance of POCTmPCR results between samples (DRKS00032359).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty participants with a median age of 48 years were included; 28 (56%) were previously colonized. Using POCTmPCR, 44 bacterial pathogens were identified in BAL from 30 patients, 49 in sputum (30 patients), and 33 in NPS (17 patients). POCTmPCR identified 24 viral pathogens in BAL from 20 patients, 22 pathogens in sputum of 19 patients, and 19 in NPS of 19 patients. For viral POCTmPCR, sensitivity and specificity compared to BAL were 84% and 97% in sputum, and 80% and 97% in NPS, respectively. For bacterial POCTmPCR, sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 67% in sputum, and 37% and 85% in NPS, respectively. POCTmPCR in comparison to conventional workup had a sensitivity of 89% and 80% and specificity of 75% and 76% for viral and bacterial pathogens, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCTmPCR in nasal swabs and sputum may serve as an alternative to BAL for detecting respiratory viruses. Performance for bacterial detection in noninvasive samples was lower. The POCTmPCR system used lacks detection for SARS-CoV-2 and Aspergillus spp.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70036"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-Care Testing by Multiplex-PCR in Different Compartments in Suspected Lower Respiratory Tract Infection After Lung Transplantation-Results of a Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Simon, Merle Sophie Kaiser, Marcus Bachmann, Gérard Krause, Jens Gottlieb\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tid.70036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation (LTx). This study evaluated a point-of-care multiplex-PCR testing system (POCTmPCR) for pathogen detection in various respiratory samples from LTx recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective single-center study, LTx recipients with RTI undergoing bronchoscopy were enrolled. Samples from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), sputum, and nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) were analyzed by POCTmPCR in conjunction with conventional diagnostics. The primary study endpoint was the concordance of POCTmPCR results between samples (DRKS00032359).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty participants with a median age of 48 years were included; 28 (56%) were previously colonized. Using POCTmPCR, 44 bacterial pathogens were identified in BAL from 30 patients, 49 in sputum (30 patients), and 33 in NPS (17 patients). POCTmPCR identified 24 viral pathogens in BAL from 20 patients, 22 pathogens in sputum of 19 patients, and 19 in NPS of 19 patients. For viral POCTmPCR, sensitivity and specificity compared to BAL were 84% and 97% in sputum, and 80% and 97% in NPS, respectively. For bacterial POCTmPCR, sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 67% in sputum, and 37% and 85% in NPS, respectively. POCTmPCR in comparison to conventional workup had a sensitivity of 89% and 80% and specificity of 75% and 76% for viral and bacterial pathogens, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCTmPCR in nasal swabs and sputum may serve as an alternative to BAL for detecting respiratory viruses. Performance for bacterial detection in noninvasive samples was lower. The POCTmPCR system used lacks detection for SARS-CoV-2 and Aspergillus spp.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:呼吸道感染(RTIs)是肺移植(LTx)术后发病和死亡的主要原因。本研究评估了一种即时多重pcr检测系统(POCTmPCR)在LTx受者各种呼吸道样本中的病原体检测。方法:在一项前瞻性单中心研究中,纳入了接受支气管镜检查的RTI患者。采用POCTmPCR结合常规诊断方法对支气管肺泡灌洗液(BAL)、痰液和鼻咽拭子(NPS)样本进行分析。主要研究终点是样本间POCTmPCR结果的一致性(DRKS00032359)。结果:纳入50例中位年龄48岁的受试者;28例(56%)先前被定植。应用POCTmPCR,在30例BAL中鉴定出44种细菌病原体,在30例痰中鉴定出49种细菌病原体,在17例NPS中鉴定出33种细菌病原体。POCTmPCR在20例BAL中鉴定出24种病毒病原体,在19例痰中鉴定出22种病原体,在19例NPS中鉴定出19种病原体。对于病毒性POCTmPCR,与BAL相比,痰液的敏感性和特异性分别为84%和97%,NPS的敏感性和特异性分别为80%和97%。细菌POCTmPCR在痰液中的敏感性和特异性分别为80%和67%,在NPS中的敏感性和特异性分别为37%和85%。与常规检查相比,POCTmPCR对病毒和细菌病原体的敏感性分别为89%和80%,特异性分别为75%和76%。结论:鼻拭子和痰液中POCTmPCR可作为BAL检测呼吸道病毒的替代方法。非侵入性样品的细菌检测性能较低。所使用的POCTmPCR系统缺乏对SARS-CoV-2和曲霉菌的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Point-of-Care Testing by Multiplex-PCR in Different Compartments in Suspected Lower Respiratory Tract Infection After Lung Transplantation-Results of a Prospective Study.

Background: Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation (LTx). This study evaluated a point-of-care multiplex-PCR testing system (POCTmPCR) for pathogen detection in various respiratory samples from LTx recipients.

Methods: In a prospective single-center study, LTx recipients with RTI undergoing bronchoscopy were enrolled. Samples from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), sputum, and nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) were analyzed by POCTmPCR in conjunction with conventional diagnostics. The primary study endpoint was the concordance of POCTmPCR results between samples (DRKS00032359).

Results: Fifty participants with a median age of 48 years were included; 28 (56%) were previously colonized. Using POCTmPCR, 44 bacterial pathogens were identified in BAL from 30 patients, 49 in sputum (30 patients), and 33 in NPS (17 patients). POCTmPCR identified 24 viral pathogens in BAL from 20 patients, 22 pathogens in sputum of 19 patients, and 19 in NPS of 19 patients. For viral POCTmPCR, sensitivity and specificity compared to BAL were 84% and 97% in sputum, and 80% and 97% in NPS, respectively. For bacterial POCTmPCR, sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 67% in sputum, and 37% and 85% in NPS, respectively. POCTmPCR in comparison to conventional workup had a sensitivity of 89% and 80% and specificity of 75% and 76% for viral and bacterial pathogens, respectively.

Conclusion: POCTmPCR in nasal swabs and sputum may serve as an alternative to BAL for detecting respiratory viruses. Performance for bacterial detection in noninvasive samples was lower. The POCTmPCR system used lacks detection for SARS-CoV-2 and Aspergillus spp.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信