Dan Bruhn, Yuzhen Fan, Kevin L Griffin, Daniel Cowan-Turner, Andrew P Scafaro, Ian Max Møller, Owen K Atkin
{"title":"叶片呼吸商的重要性。","authors":"Dan Bruhn, Yuzhen Fan, Kevin L Griffin, Daniel Cowan-Turner, Andrew P Scafaro, Ian Max Møller, Owen K Atkin","doi":"10.1111/ppl.70235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rates of leaf respiratory CO<sub>2</sub>-release (R<sub>CO2</sub>) are important for terrestrial biosphere models that estimate carbon exchange between plants and the atmosphere. Hitherto, models of R<sub>CO2</sub> have primarily been based on considerations of respiratory energy demand (particularly ATP) for maintenance and growth purposes. Respiratory ATP synthesis is closely tied to the rate of respiratory O<sub>2</sub>-uptake (R<sub>O2</sub>), with relative engagement of the alternative oxidase influencing the ATP:O ratio. However, the extent to which respiratory ATP synthesis is coupled to leaf R<sub>CO2</sub> depends on the respiratory quotient (RQ, mol CO<sub>2</sub> efflux per unit mol O<sub>2</sub> uptake), with models predicting leaf R<sub>CO2</sub> assuming that the RQ is at unity. Here, we show systematic inter-specific, temporal and temperature-dependent variation in leaf RQ, with values of RQ ranging from 0.51 to 2.2, challenging model assumptions on the RQ. We discuss possible mechanisms underlying the variation in leaf RQ, potential ways forward in terms of new measurement protocols, and perspectives for modelled R<sub>CO2</sub>. Our analyses highlight a range of outstanding research questions that need to be answered before we can mechanistically model leaf R<sub>CO2</sub> at various scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":20164,"journal":{"name":"Physiologia plantarum","volume":"177 2","pages":"e70235"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of the leaf respiratory quotient.\",\"authors\":\"Dan Bruhn, Yuzhen Fan, Kevin L Griffin, Daniel Cowan-Turner, Andrew P Scafaro, Ian Max Møller, Owen K Atkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ppl.70235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rates of leaf respiratory CO<sub>2</sub>-release (R<sub>CO2</sub>) are important for terrestrial biosphere models that estimate carbon exchange between plants and the atmosphere. Hitherto, models of R<sub>CO2</sub> have primarily been based on considerations of respiratory energy demand (particularly ATP) for maintenance and growth purposes. Respiratory ATP synthesis is closely tied to the rate of respiratory O<sub>2</sub>-uptake (R<sub>O2</sub>), with relative engagement of the alternative oxidase influencing the ATP:O ratio. However, the extent to which respiratory ATP synthesis is coupled to leaf R<sub>CO2</sub> depends on the respiratory quotient (RQ, mol CO<sub>2</sub> efflux per unit mol O<sub>2</sub> uptake), with models predicting leaf R<sub>CO2</sub> assuming that the RQ is at unity. Here, we show systematic inter-specific, temporal and temperature-dependent variation in leaf RQ, with values of RQ ranging from 0.51 to 2.2, challenging model assumptions on the RQ. We discuss possible mechanisms underlying the variation in leaf RQ, potential ways forward in terms of new measurement protocols, and perspectives for modelled R<sub>CO2</sub>. Our analyses highlight a range of outstanding research questions that need to be answered before we can mechanistically model leaf R<sub>CO2</sub> at various scales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiologia plantarum\",\"volume\":\"177 2\",\"pages\":\"e70235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012293/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiologia plantarum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70235\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiologia plantarum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70235","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rates of leaf respiratory CO2-release (RCO2) are important for terrestrial biosphere models that estimate carbon exchange between plants and the atmosphere. Hitherto, models of RCO2 have primarily been based on considerations of respiratory energy demand (particularly ATP) for maintenance and growth purposes. Respiratory ATP synthesis is closely tied to the rate of respiratory O2-uptake (RO2), with relative engagement of the alternative oxidase influencing the ATP:O ratio. However, the extent to which respiratory ATP synthesis is coupled to leaf RCO2 depends on the respiratory quotient (RQ, mol CO2 efflux per unit mol O2 uptake), with models predicting leaf RCO2 assuming that the RQ is at unity. Here, we show systematic inter-specific, temporal and temperature-dependent variation in leaf RQ, with values of RQ ranging from 0.51 to 2.2, challenging model assumptions on the RQ. We discuss possible mechanisms underlying the variation in leaf RQ, potential ways forward in terms of new measurement protocols, and perspectives for modelled RCO2. Our analyses highlight a range of outstanding research questions that need to be answered before we can mechanistically model leaf RCO2 at various scales.
期刊介绍:
Physiologia Plantarum is an international journal committed to publishing the best full-length original research papers that advance our understanding of primary mechanisms of plant development, growth and productivity as well as plant interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment. All organisational levels of experimental plant biology – from molecular and cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics to ecophysiology and global change biology – fall within the scope of the journal. The content is distributed between 5 main subject areas supervised by Subject Editors specialised in the respective domain: (1) biochemistry and metabolism, (2) ecophysiology, stress and adaptation, (3) uptake, transport and assimilation, (4) development, growth and differentiation, (5) photobiology and photosynthesis.