非侵入性纤维化标志物在活检证实的肝脏疾病中的表现。

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Forum Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14744/hf.2024.2024.0024
Nilay Danis, Fulya Gunsar, Funda Yilmaz, Deniz Nart, Ilker Turan, Zeki Karasu, Galip Ersoz, Ulus Salih Akarca, Omer Ozutemiz
{"title":"非侵入性纤维化标志物在活检证实的肝脏疾病中的表现。","authors":"Nilay Danis, Fulya Gunsar, Funda Yilmaz, Deniz Nart, Ilker Turan, Zeki Karasu, Galip Ersoz, Ulus Salih Akarca, Omer Ozutemiz","doi":"10.14744/hf.2024.2024.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to investigate the concordance of Transient Elastography FibroScan<sup>®</sup> (FS) measurements, Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and the Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) scores with each other and with liver biopsies in predicting histological fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective collected data cohort study spanning seven consecutive years, simultaneous FS measurements, FIB-4, and APRI scores of 778 patients with different diagnoses who had undergone liver biopsy were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 417 (53.6%) of the patients were female. The median age was 51 years. The diagnoses were HBV (n=228), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (n=185), HCV (n=58), cryptogenic (n=53), primary biliary cholangitis (n=40), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n=28), overlap syndrome (OS) (n=23), multiple diagnoses (n=42), and other diagnoses (n=83). All three methods showed a strong correlation with histological fibrosis, and FS demonstrated a statistically significantly superior relationship compared to FIB-4 and APRI. In AIH and OS, FIB-4 and APRI scores do not show a consistent increase with histological stage; however, FS does. In MASLD, all three methods correlate with histologic stage, but FS measurements appear significantly superior.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although FIB-4, APRI, and FS correlate well with histological fibrosis, especially in MASLD, evaluation with FS, if available, should be preferred. In the evaluation of fibrosis in AIH and OS, laboratory-based indicators should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":29722,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Forum","volume":"6 1","pages":"16-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of non-invasive fibrosis markers in biopsy-proven liver disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Nilay Danis, Fulya Gunsar, Funda Yilmaz, Deniz Nart, Ilker Turan, Zeki Karasu, Galip Ersoz, Ulus Salih Akarca, Omer Ozutemiz\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/hf.2024.2024.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to investigate the concordance of Transient Elastography FibroScan<sup>®</sup> (FS) measurements, Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and the Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) scores with each other and with liver biopsies in predicting histological fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective collected data cohort study spanning seven consecutive years, simultaneous FS measurements, FIB-4, and APRI scores of 778 patients with different diagnoses who had undergone liver biopsy were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 417 (53.6%) of the patients were female. The median age was 51 years. The diagnoses were HBV (n=228), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (n=185), HCV (n=58), cryptogenic (n=53), primary biliary cholangitis (n=40), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n=28), overlap syndrome (OS) (n=23), multiple diagnoses (n=42), and other diagnoses (n=83). All three methods showed a strong correlation with histological fibrosis, and FS demonstrated a statistically significantly superior relationship compared to FIB-4 and APRI. In AIH and OS, FIB-4 and APRI scores do not show a consistent increase with histological stage; however, FS does. In MASLD, all three methods correlate with histologic stage, but FS measurements appear significantly superior.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although FIB-4, APRI, and FS correlate well with histological fibrosis, especially in MASLD, evaluation with FS, if available, should be preferred. In the evaluation of fibrosis in AIH and OS, laboratory-based indicators should be avoided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"16-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/hf.2024.2024.0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/hf.2024.2024.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:本研究的主要目的是研究瞬时弹性成像纤维扫描®(FS)测量、纤维化-4 (FIB-4)和天冬氨酸转氨酶血小板比率指数(APRI)评分之间的一致性,以及与肝活检预测组织学纤维化的一致性。材料和方法:在这项连续7年的单中心、横断面、回顾性收集数据的队列研究中,对778例不同诊断的肝活检患者的FS测量、FIB-4和APRI评分进行了评估。结果:女性417例,占53.6%。平均年龄为51岁。诊断为HBV (n=228)、代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD) (n=185)、HCV (n=58)、隐源性(n=53)、原发性胆管炎(n=40)、自身免疫性肝炎(AIH) (n=28)、重叠综合征(OS) (n=23)、多重诊断(n=42)和其他诊断(n=83)。三种方法均与组织学纤维化有很强的相关性,FS与FIB-4和APRI的相关性有统计学上的显著优势。在AIH和OS中,FIB-4和APRI评分不随组织学分期一致升高;然而,FS可以。在MASLD中,所有三种方法都与组织学分期相关,但FS测量明显优于其他方法。结论:尽管FIB-4、APRI和FS与组织学纤维化密切相关,尤其是在MASLD中,但如果可用FS进行评估,应优先考虑。在评估AIH和OS的纤维化时,应避免使用实验室指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of non-invasive fibrosis markers in biopsy-proven liver disorders.

Background and aim: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the concordance of Transient Elastography FibroScan® (FS) measurements, Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and the Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) scores with each other and with liver biopsies in predicting histological fibrosis.

Materials and methods: In this single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective collected data cohort study spanning seven consecutive years, simultaneous FS measurements, FIB-4, and APRI scores of 778 patients with different diagnoses who had undergone liver biopsy were evaluated.

Results: A total of 417 (53.6%) of the patients were female. The median age was 51 years. The diagnoses were HBV (n=228), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (n=185), HCV (n=58), cryptogenic (n=53), primary biliary cholangitis (n=40), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n=28), overlap syndrome (OS) (n=23), multiple diagnoses (n=42), and other diagnoses (n=83). All three methods showed a strong correlation with histological fibrosis, and FS demonstrated a statistically significantly superior relationship compared to FIB-4 and APRI. In AIH and OS, FIB-4 and APRI scores do not show a consistent increase with histological stage; however, FS does. In MASLD, all three methods correlate with histologic stage, but FS measurements appear significantly superior.

Conclusion: Although FIB-4, APRI, and FS correlate well with histological fibrosis, especially in MASLD, evaluation with FS, if available, should be preferred. In the evaluation of fibrosis in AIH and OS, laboratory-based indicators should be avoided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信