基于远程医疗的老年人认知、社会认知、情绪和功能独立性评估。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Impairment Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1071/IB24114
Michelle Kelly, Michelle Kelly, Simon Mierendorff, Simon Mierendorff, Kylie Wales, Kylie Wales, Johanna Voeste, Johanna Voeste, Joanne Allen, Joanne Allen, Skye McDonald, Skye McDonald
{"title":"基于远程医疗的老年人认知、社会认知、情绪和功能独立性评估。","authors":"Michelle Kelly, Michelle Kelly, Simon Mierendorff, Simon Mierendorff, Kylie Wales, Kylie Wales, Johanna Voeste, Johanna Voeste, Joanne Allen, Joanne Allen, Skye McDonald, Skye McDonald","doi":"10.1071/IB24114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Mild cognitive impairment affects over 15% of adults aged 50+ years and is a primary risk indicator for dementia. Although access to assessment is crucial, many older adults face barriers to in-person evaluation. Methods This study used a randomised cross-over design to assess the practicality, acceptability, and adaptation of a telehealth-based screening battery tailored for older adults. Forty-three volunteers aged 50+ years (m =70.3, s.d.=10.8) completed in-person or videoconference assessments, including the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Brief Assessment of Social Skills (BASS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Assessment of Living Skills And Resources-2 (ALSAR-R2). The alternate format was administered after 3weeks. Practicality was assessed with reference to task modifications, completion, and administration time. Acceptability was evaluated via questionnaire. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results Minimal modifications were needed for the videoconference format, and it was highly acceptable to respondents. Reliability across formats was excellent for BASS Empathy, HADS Depression, MBI and ALSAR-R2 (ICC=1.00-0.92) and good for ACE-III, HADS Anxiety, and BASS Face Emotion Perception, Face Identification, and Social Disinhibition scales (ICC=0.77-0.89). Conclusions Findings support the feasibility of telehealth-based administration of the screening battery; however, biases in emotion perception performance between modalities require further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"26 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telehealth-based assessment of cognition, social cognition, mood, and functional independence in older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Kelly, Michelle Kelly, Simon Mierendorff, Simon Mierendorff, Kylie Wales, Kylie Wales, Johanna Voeste, Johanna Voeste, Joanne Allen, Joanne Allen, Skye McDonald, Skye McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/IB24114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Mild cognitive impairment affects over 15% of adults aged 50+ years and is a primary risk indicator for dementia. Although access to assessment is crucial, many older adults face barriers to in-person evaluation. Methods This study used a randomised cross-over design to assess the practicality, acceptability, and adaptation of a telehealth-based screening battery tailored for older adults. Forty-three volunteers aged 50+ years (m =70.3, s.d.=10.8) completed in-person or videoconference assessments, including the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Brief Assessment of Social Skills (BASS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Assessment of Living Skills And Resources-2 (ALSAR-R2). The alternate format was administered after 3weeks. Practicality was assessed with reference to task modifications, completion, and administration time. Acceptability was evaluated via questionnaire. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results Minimal modifications were needed for the videoconference format, and it was highly acceptable to respondents. Reliability across formats was excellent for BASS Empathy, HADS Depression, MBI and ALSAR-R2 (ICC=1.00-0.92) and good for ACE-III, HADS Anxiety, and BASS Face Emotion Perception, Face Identification, and Social Disinhibition scales (ICC=0.77-0.89). Conclusions Findings support the feasibility of telehealth-based administration of the screening battery; however, biases in emotion perception performance between modalities require further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Impairment\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Impairment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24114\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:轻度认知障碍影响超过15%的50岁以上成年人,是痴呆症的主要风险指标。尽管获得评估至关重要,但许多老年人在接受当面评估时面临障碍。方法本研究采用随机交叉设计来评估专为老年人定制的基于远程医疗的筛查电池的实用性、可接受性和适应性。43名年龄在50岁以上的志愿者(m =70.3, s.d =10.8)完成了面对面或视频会议评估,包括阿登布鲁克认知测验- iii (ACE-III)、社交技能简要评估(BASS)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)、修正Barthel指数(MBI)和生活技能和资源评估-2 (ALSAR-R2)。3周后给药。实用性评估参考任务修改,完成和管理时间。通过问卷评估可接受性。采用类内相关系数(ICCs)评估信度。结果对视频会议的格式进行了最小的修改,并得到了受访者的高度接受。BASS共情量表、HADS抑郁量表、MBI量表和ALSAR-R2量表各格式的信度均极好(ICC=1.00-0.92), ACE-III量表、HADS焦虑量表和BASS面部情绪知觉量表、面部识别量表和社交去抑制量表的信度均良好(ICC=0.77-0.89)。结论研究结果支持基于远程医疗给药筛选电池的可行性;然而,不同模式之间情绪知觉表现的偏差还有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Telehealth-based assessment of cognition, social cognition, mood, and functional independence in older adults.

Background Mild cognitive impairment affects over 15% of adults aged 50+ years and is a primary risk indicator for dementia. Although access to assessment is crucial, many older adults face barriers to in-person evaluation. Methods This study used a randomised cross-over design to assess the practicality, acceptability, and adaptation of a telehealth-based screening battery tailored for older adults. Forty-three volunteers aged 50+ years (m =70.3, s.d.=10.8) completed in-person or videoconference assessments, including the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Brief Assessment of Social Skills (BASS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Assessment of Living Skills And Resources-2 (ALSAR-R2). The alternate format was administered after 3weeks. Practicality was assessed with reference to task modifications, completion, and administration time. Acceptability was evaluated via questionnaire. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results Minimal modifications were needed for the videoconference format, and it was highly acceptable to respondents. Reliability across formats was excellent for BASS Empathy, HADS Depression, MBI and ALSAR-R2 (ICC=1.00-0.92) and good for ACE-III, HADS Anxiety, and BASS Face Emotion Perception, Face Identification, and Social Disinhibition scales (ICC=0.77-0.89). Conclusions Findings support the feasibility of telehealth-based administration of the screening battery; however, biases in emotion perception performance between modalities require further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Impairment
Brain Impairment CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal addresses topics related to the aetiology, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of brain impairment with a particular focus on the implications for functional status, participation, rehabilitation and quality of life. Disciplines reflect a broad multidisciplinary scope and include neuroscience, neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech pathology, social work, and nursing. Submissions are welcome across the full range of conditions that affect brain function (stroke, tumour, progressive neurological illnesses, dementia, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) throughout the lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信