通过在地区癌症中心对多学科团队进行虚拟培训,获得实施大病护理项目的经验。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Russell Leong, Sandra Andreychuk, Cheryl Shoemaker, Georgia Georgiou, Helena Adjekum, Ruth Locis, Adrienne Sultana, Suganya Vadivelu, Oren Levine
{"title":"通过在地区癌症中心对多学科团队进行虚拟培训,获得实施大病护理项目的经验。","authors":"Russell Leong, Sandra Andreychuk, Cheryl Shoemaker, Georgia Georgiou, Helena Adjekum, Ruth Locis, Adrienne Sultana, Suganya Vadivelu, Oren Levine","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09525-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) was launched at the Juravinski Cancer Centre (JCC) to promote early, high-quality goals of care conversations with patients experiencing advanced cancer. Training was provided to multidisciplinary disease site teams (DSTs). The objective of this study is to validate the virtual SICP training format and assess the clinician and patient experience after 6 months of implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinicians completed SICP training through a virtual workshop on Zoom and responded to surveys describing their experience before and after the training. Clinicians then completed a validated survey 6 months later, describing their experience of implementing serious illness conversations (SIC) into practice. Consenting patients were contacted within 2 weeks of a SIC encounter and responded to validated questions about their experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Training was provided to 52 healthcare providers in the breast, lung and brain malignancy DSTs. Overall, the virtual training format was well received. Training could be improved by allowing more time to practice skills and including more video examples. By 6 months, 39% of clinicians reported conducting SIC. Most users reported that SIC helps them understand patient goals. Among non-users, insufficient time was the most cited barrier. Nurses in a non-primary care model reported difficulty engaging in SIC. Most patients felt that SIC was a worthwhile experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates the feasibility of the virtual SICP implementation process. Additionally, SICP was successfully delivered across multidisciplinary DSTs. Training will continue rolling out incrementally for all DSTs at the JCC, exploring the incorporation of self-learning modules.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 6","pages":"468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience implementing the serious illness care program through virtual training of multidisciplinary teams at a regional cancer centre.\",\"authors\":\"Russell Leong, Sandra Andreychuk, Cheryl Shoemaker, Georgia Georgiou, Helena Adjekum, Ruth Locis, Adrienne Sultana, Suganya Vadivelu, Oren Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-025-09525-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) was launched at the Juravinski Cancer Centre (JCC) to promote early, high-quality goals of care conversations with patients experiencing advanced cancer. Training was provided to multidisciplinary disease site teams (DSTs). The objective of this study is to validate the virtual SICP training format and assess the clinician and patient experience after 6 months of implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinicians completed SICP training through a virtual workshop on Zoom and responded to surveys describing their experience before and after the training. Clinicians then completed a validated survey 6 months later, describing their experience of implementing serious illness conversations (SIC) into practice. Consenting patients were contacted within 2 weeks of a SIC encounter and responded to validated questions about their experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Training was provided to 52 healthcare providers in the breast, lung and brain malignancy DSTs. Overall, the virtual training format was well received. Training could be improved by allowing more time to practice skills and including more video examples. By 6 months, 39% of clinicians reported conducting SIC. Most users reported that SIC helps them understand patient goals. Among non-users, insufficient time was the most cited barrier. Nurses in a non-primary care model reported difficulty engaging in SIC. Most patients felt that SIC was a worthwhile experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates the feasibility of the virtual SICP implementation process. Additionally, SICP was successfully delivered across multidisciplinary DSTs. Training will continue rolling out incrementally for all DSTs at the JCC, exploring the incorporation of self-learning modules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09525-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09525-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:重大疾病护理计划(SICP)在Juravinski癌症中心(JCC)启动,旨在促进与晚期癌症患者进行早期、高质量的护理对话。向多学科疾病现场小组(DSTs)提供了培训。本研究的目的是验证虚拟SICP培训格式,并在实施6个月后评估临床医生和患者的体验。方法:临床医生通过Zoom的虚拟研讨会完成SICP培训,并对培训前后的经验进行调查。6个月后,临床医生完成了一项有效的调查,描述了他们在实践中实施严重疾病对话(SIC)的经验。在两周内与同意的患者进行了SIC接触,并回答了有关他们经历的有效问题。结果:对52名医疗保健提供者进行了乳腺、肺部和脑部恶性肿瘤DSTs培训。总的来说,虚拟培训形式很受欢迎。培训可以通过允许更多的时间练习技能和包括更多的视频例子来改进。6个月后,39%的临床医生报告进行了SIC。大多数用户报告说,SIC帮助他们了解患者的目标。在不使用手机的人群中,时间不足是被提及最多的障碍。非初级保健模式的护士报告了参与SIC的困难。大多数患者认为SIC是一次有价值的经历。结论:我们的研究证明了虚拟SICP实施过程的可行性。此外,SICP成功地跨多学科DSTs交付。联合培训中心将继续逐步为所有警务人员提供培训,并探索纳入自学模块。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experience implementing the serious illness care program through virtual training of multidisciplinary teams at a regional cancer centre.

Purpose: The Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) was launched at the Juravinski Cancer Centre (JCC) to promote early, high-quality goals of care conversations with patients experiencing advanced cancer. Training was provided to multidisciplinary disease site teams (DSTs). The objective of this study is to validate the virtual SICP training format and assess the clinician and patient experience after 6 months of implementation.

Methods: Clinicians completed SICP training through a virtual workshop on Zoom and responded to surveys describing their experience before and after the training. Clinicians then completed a validated survey 6 months later, describing their experience of implementing serious illness conversations (SIC) into practice. Consenting patients were contacted within 2 weeks of a SIC encounter and responded to validated questions about their experience.

Results: Training was provided to 52 healthcare providers in the breast, lung and brain malignancy DSTs. Overall, the virtual training format was well received. Training could be improved by allowing more time to practice skills and including more video examples. By 6 months, 39% of clinicians reported conducting SIC. Most users reported that SIC helps them understand patient goals. Among non-users, insufficient time was the most cited barrier. Nurses in a non-primary care model reported difficulty engaging in SIC. Most patients felt that SIC was a worthwhile experience.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of the virtual SICP implementation process. Additionally, SICP was successfully delivered across multidisciplinary DSTs. Training will continue rolling out incrementally for all DSTs at the JCC, exploring the incorporation of self-learning modules.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信